Transkription · 4.8M monatliche besuche

Fathom ist ein erstklassiger KI-Meeting-Assistent, der Ihre Videoanrufe in Zoom, Google Meet und Microsoft Teams automatisch aufzeichnet, transkribiert und zusammenfasst. Er befreit Sie vom Notizenmachen und ermöglicht es Ihnen, sich voll und ganz auf das Gespräch zu konzentrieren. Fathom liefert sofortige, teilbare Zusammenfassungen und Aktionspunkte und lässt sich nahtlos in Ihr CRM und andere Produktivitätstools integrieren, was erhebliche Zeit spart und die Effizienz nach dem Meeting steigert.

Website besuchen Details ansehen

Grain

Kundenfeedback · 189.3K monatliche besuche

Grain ist ein KI-gestützter Notizassistent für Meetings, der für wachsende Teams entwickelt wurde. Er zeichnet Videogespräche von Plattformen wie Zoom, Google Meet und Microsoft Teams automatisch auf, transkribiert und fasst sie zusammen. Er hilft Vertriebs-, Kundenerfolgs- und Produktteams, wichtige Erkenntnisse zu gewinnen, Follow-ups zu automatisieren, Daten mit CRMs zu synchronisieren und Team-Coaching sowie Zusammenarbeit zu fördern, damit alle während der Gespräche konzentriert bleiben können.

Website besuchen Details ansehen

Fathom vs Grain: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Fathom und Grain nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Fathom Produktübersicht

Preview

Grain Produktübersicht

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

Feature	Fathom	Grain
Hauptkategorie	Transkription	Kundenfeedback
Hinzugefügt	2025-08-15	2025-08-16
Preismodell	Freemium	Freemium
Offizielle Website	fathom.video	grain.com
Produkttyp	Website	Website
Performance data
Nutzerbewertung	Nicht verifiziert	Nicht verifiziert
Kommentare	0	0
Monatliche Besuche	4.8M	189.3K
Monatliches Wachstum	-3.4%	12.9%
Favoriten	132	116
Details	Details ansehen	Details ansehen

Fathom vs Grain monthly traffic

Compare Fathom and Grain by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Fathom vs Grain monthly traffic comparison, Fathom currently shows 4.8M visits and Grain shows 189.3K; Fathom has about 25.6 times the visible traffic of Grain, an absolute difference of about 4.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Fathom monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche

4.8M

Ø Besuchsdauer

3:11

Seiten pro Besuch

3.25

Absprungrate

43.13%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇺🇸United States	67.29%	3.3M
🇬🇧United Kingdom	12.05%	583.1K
🇨🇦Canada	7.79%	376.9K
🇮🇳India	7.02%	339.7K
🇦🇺Australia	5.85%	283.1K

Traffic-Quellen

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Direkt	78.73%	3.8M
Verweis	14.01%	677.9K
E-Mail	7.26%	351.3K

Suchbegriffe

fathomfathom apifathom desktop appfathom downloadfathom mcp

Grain monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche

189.3K

Ø Besuchsdauer

2:07

Seiten pro Besuch

2.88

Absprungrate

36.33%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇺🇸United States	69.54%	131.6K
🇮🇹Italy	10.4%	19.7K
🇪🇸Spain	7.18%	13.6K
🇨🇦Canada	6.76%	12.8K
🇧🇷Brazil	6.12%	11.6K

Traffic-Quellen

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Direkt	91.53%	173.2K
Verweis	4.68%	8.9K
E-Mail	3.79%	7.2K

Suchbegriffe

graingrain aigrain ai for claudegrain appgrain pricing

Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Fathom first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Fathom and Grain

Fathom Core features

Besprechungsassistent

Konversationsintelligenz

Transkription

Grain Core features

Besprechungsassistent

Konversationsintelligenz

Kundenfeedback

Wissensmanagement

Use cases

Fathom Use cases

KI-Notizenmacher

Google Meet

Besprechungszusammenfassung

Produktivität

Transkription

Zoom

Automatische Notizen

Kollaboration

Besprechungsassistent

Microsoft Teams

Vertrieb

Grain Use cases

KI-Notizenmacher

Google Meet

Besprechungszusammenfassung

Produktivität

Transkription

Zoom

Automatische Notizen

Konversationsintelligenz

CRM-Integration

Kundenfeedback

Meeting-Rekorder

Vertriebscoaching

Teamzusammenarbeit

Fathom vs Grain：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Fathom vs Grain comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fathom is primarily listed under “Transkription”, while Grain is primarily listed under “Kundenfeedback”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fathom: Transkription; Grain: Kundenfeedback); Monthly visits (Fathom: 4.8M; Grain: 189.3K); Monthly growth (Fathom: -3.4%; Grain: 12.9%); Favorites (Fathom: 132; Grain: 116); Website (Fathom: fathom.video; Grain: grain.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Fathom first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Fathom and Grain currently overlap in shared categories: Besprechungsassistent und Konversationsintelligenz; shared tags: KI-Notizenmacher, Google Meet, Besprechungszusammenfassung, Produktivität, Transkription und Zoom. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Fathom's unique categories/tags are Transkription, Automatische Notizen, Kollaboration, Besprechungsassistent, Microsoft Teams und Vertrieb; Grain's are Kundenfeedback, Wissensmanagement, Automatische Notizen, Konversationsintelligenz, CRM-Integration, Meeting-Rekorder, Vertriebscoaching und Teamzusammenarbeit. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Fathom has no verified rating, 0 comments, 132 favorites, and 127 likes；Grain has no verified rating, 0 comments, 116 favorites, and 133 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Fathom first

Put Fathom on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Transkription” and especially Transkription, Automatische Notizen, Kollaboration, Besprechungsassistent, Microsoft Teams und Vertrieb. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Fathom also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 4.8M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Grain first

Put Grain on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Kundenfeedback” and especially Kundenfeedback, Wissensmanagement, Automatische Notizen, Konversationsintelligenz, CRM-Integration und Meeting-Rekorder. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Grain also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 189.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fathom and Grain, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Fathom and Grain?

Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.

Where does this comparison data come from?

The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.

What do unknown fields mean?

Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.