Modellbereitstellung · 210.5K monatliche besuche

Flowise ist eine Open-Source-Low-Code-Plattform zum visuellen Erstellen von benutzerdefinierten KI-Agenten und -Anwendungen. Mit einer Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche können Entwickler und Teams komplexe Systeme, von RAG-gestützten Chatbots bis hin zu Multi-Agenten-Workflows, schnell prototypisieren und bereitstellen. Es unterstützt über 100 LLMs, verschiedene Datenquellen und bietet unternehmenstaugliche Funktionen für eine skalierbare Bereitstellung.

Website besuchen Details ansehen

Langflow

Low-Code No-Code · 243.6K monatliche besuche

Langflow ist eine visuelle Open-Source-Benutzeroberfläche zum Erstellen und Bereitstellen von KI-Anwendungen. Es verfügt über eine Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche, um LLMs, Agenten und Tools zu verketten, was ein schnelles Prototyping und die Bereitstellung komplexer Workflows wie RAG und Multi-Agenten-Systeme ermöglicht. Es unterstützt umfangreiche Integrationen und bietet sowohl selbst gehostete als auch Cloud-Optionen.

Website besuchen Details ansehen

Flowise vs Langflow: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Flowise und Langflow nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Flowise Produktübersicht

Preview

Langflow Produktübersicht

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

Feature	Flowise	Langflow
Hauptkategorie	Modellbereitstellung	Low-Code No-Code
Hinzugefügt	2025-08-08	2025-08-14
Preismodell	Freemium	Freemium
Offizielle Website	flowiseai.com	www.langflow.org
Produkttyp	Website	Website
Performance data
Nutzerbewertung	Nicht verifiziert	Nicht verifiziert
Kommentare	0	0
Monatliche Besuche	210.5K	243.6K
Monatliches Wachstum	-5.9%	6.2%
Favoriten	119	69
Details	Details ansehen	Details ansehen

Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic

Compare Flowise and Langflow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic comparison, Flowise currently shows 210.5K visits and Langflow shows 243.6K; Langflow has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Flowise, an absolute difference of about 33.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Flowise monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche

210.5K

Ø Besuchsdauer

1:55

Seiten pro Besuch

3.71

Absprungrate

40.16%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇮🇳India	34.54%	72.7K
🇺🇸United States	25%	52.6K
🇸🇬Singapore	14.48%	30.5K
🇻🇳Vietnam	14.48%	30.5K
🇩🇪Germany	11.5%	24.2K

Traffic-Quellen

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Direkt	71.85%	151.3K
Verweis	27.25%	57.4K
E-Mail	0.9%	1.9K

Suchbegriffe

flowiseflowise aiflowiseaiflowiseai apiflowwise

Langflow monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche

243.6K

Ø Besuchsdauer

1:09

Seiten pro Besuch

1.95

Absprungrate

44.67%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇨🇳China	42.24%	102.9K
🇮🇳India	18.05%	44K
🇺🇸United States	16.88%	41.1K
🇮🇩Indonesia	16.72%	40.7K
🇬🇧United Kingdom	6.11%	14.9K

Traffic-Quellen

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Direkt	78.32%	190.8K
Verweis	20.42%	49.7K
E-Mail	1.26%	3.1K

Suchbegriffe

composiolangflowlangfuseopenrouterpdf to markdown

Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Flowise and Langflow

Flowise Core features

Low-Code No-Code

Modellbereitstellung

Workflow-Automatisierung

Chatbot

Langflow Core features

Low-Code No-Code

Workflow-Automatisierung

Use cases

Flowise Use cases

KI-Agent

Entwicklerwerkzeuge

Low-Code

Multi-Agenten-Systeme

No-Code

Open Source

Retrieval-Augmentierte Generierung

Visueller Builder

Workflow-Automatisierung

Chatbot-Builder

LangChain

Langflow Use cases

KI-Agent

Entwicklerwerkzeuge

Low-Code

Multi-Agenten-Systeme

No-Code

Open Source

Retrieval-Augmentierte Generierung

Visueller Builder

Workflow-Automatisierung

API

Großes Sprachmodell

Flowise vs Langflow：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Flowise vs Langflow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Flowise is primarily listed under “Modellbereitstellung”, while Langflow is primarily listed under “Low-Code No-Code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Flowise: Modellbereitstellung; Langflow: Low-Code No-Code); Monthly visits (Flowise: 210.5K; Langflow: 243.6K); Monthly growth (Flowise: -5.9%; Langflow: 6.2%); Favorites (Flowise: 119; Langflow: 69); Website (Flowise: flowiseai.com; Langflow: www.langflow.org). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Flowise and Langflow currently overlap in shared categories: Low-Code No-Code; shared tags: KI-Agent, Entwicklerwerkzeuge, Low-Code, Multi-Agenten-Systeme, No-Code, Open Source, Retrieval-Augmentierte Generierung, Visueller Builder und Workflow-Automatisierung. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Flowise's unique categories/tags are Modellbereitstellung, Workflow-Automatisierung, Chatbot, Chatbot-Builder und LangChain; Langflow's are Workflow-Automatisierung, API und Großes Sprachmodell. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Flowise has no verified rating, 0 comments, 119 favorites, and 134 likes；Langflow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 69 favorites, and 77 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Flowise first

Put Flowise on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Modellbereitstellung” and especially Modellbereitstellung, Workflow-Automatisierung, Chatbot, Chatbot-Builder und LangChain. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Flowise also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 210.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Langflow first

Put Langflow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Low-Code No-Code” and especially Workflow-Automatisierung, API und Großes Sprachmodell. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Langflow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 243.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Flowise and Langflow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Flowise and Langflow?

Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.

Where does this comparison data come from?

The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.

What do unknown fields mean?

Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.