ToolMage
Anmelden
forms.app
Datenerfassung · 1.1M monatliche besuche

forms.app ist ein KI-gestützter Online-Formularersteller, mit dem Benutzer mühelos Formulare, Umfragen und Quizze erstellen können. Es verfügt über eine intuitive Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche, KI-gesteuerte Fragen- und Antwortgenerierung, umfangreiche Anpassungsoptionen und nahtlose Integrationen zur Automatisierung der Datenerfassung und von Arbeitsabläufen.

VS
Jotform
Datenerfassung · 42.1M monatliche besuche

Jotform ist ein leistungsstarker No-Code-Online-Formularersteller, mit dem jeder benutzerdefinierte Formulare für die Datenerfassung, Zahlungen und Workflow-Automatisierung erstellen kann. Mit einer Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche, über 10.000 Vorlagen und umfangreichen Integrationen vereinfacht es alles von der Lead-Generierung und Umfragen bis hin zu Veranstaltungsanmeldungen und E-Commerce. Seine robusten Sicherheitsfunktionen, einschließlich HIPAA- und PCI-Konformität, machen es zu einer vertrauenswürdigen Wahl für über 30 Millionen Benutzer weltweit.

forms.app vs Jotform: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche forms.app und Jotform nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

forms.app Produktübersicht

forms.app ist ein KI-gestützter Online-Formularersteller, mit dem Benutzer mühelos Formulare, Umfragen und Quizze erstellen können. Es verfügt über eine intuitive Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche, KI-gesteuerte Fragen- und Antwortgenerierung, umfangreiche Anpassungsoptionen und nahtlose Integrationen zur Automatisierung der Datenerfassung und von Arbeitsabläufen.

Preview

Jotform Produktübersicht

Jotform ist ein leistungsstarker No-Code-Online-Formularersteller, mit dem jeder benutzerdefinierte Formulare für die Datenerfassung, Zahlungen und Workflow-Automatisierung erstellen kann. Mit einer Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche, über 10.000 Vorlagen und umfangreichen Integrationen vereinfacht es alles von der Lead-Generierung und Umfragen bis hin zu Veranstaltungsanmeldungen und E-Commerce. Seine robusten Sicherheitsfunktionen, einschließlich HIPAA- und PCI-Konformität, machen es zu einer vertrauenswürdigen Wahl für über 30 Millionen Benutzer weltweit.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

Featureforms.appJotform
HauptkategorieDatenerfassungDatenerfassung
Hinzugefügt2025-08-162025-08-02
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websiteforms.appwww.jotform.com
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche1.1M42.1M
Monatliches Wachstum-5.3%-3.3%
Favoriten138116
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

forms.app vs Jotform monthly traffic

Compare forms.app and Jotform by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the forms.app vs Jotform monthly traffic comparison, forms.app currently shows 1.1M visits and Jotform shows 42.1M; Jotform has about 38.5 times the visible traffic of forms.app, an absolute difference of about 41M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

forms.app monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
1.1M
Ø Besuchsdauer
2:09
Seiten pro Besuch
2.64
Absprungrate
56.9%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 1.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 1.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 1.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 1.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 1.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 1.1M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇧🇷Brazil42.86%469.1K
🇫🇷France16.92%185.2K
🇺🇸United States15.36%168.1K
🇲🇽Mexico14.51%158.8K
🇬🇧United Kingdom10.35%113.3K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt82.5%902.9K
Verweis11.17%122.3K
E-Mail6.33%69.3K

Suchbegriffe

formsforms appgoogle formsjotformtypeform

Jotform monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
42.1M
Ø Besuchsdauer
3:11
Seiten pro Besuch
3.28
Absprungrate
51.67%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 40.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 41.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 39.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 44.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 43.5M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 42.1M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States74.23%31.2M
🇬🇧United Kingdom7.43%3.1M
🇦🇺Australia6.74%2.8M
🇨🇦Canada6.68%2.8M
🇵🇭Philippines4.92%2.1M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt71.02%29.9M
Verweis19.63%8.3M
E-Mail9.35%3.9M

Suchbegriffe

google sheetsjalalivejotformjotform logintypeform
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Jotform first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of forms.app and Jotform

forms.app Core features

Datenerfassung
Lead-Generierung
Formulare
Feedback

Jotform Core features

Datenerfassung
Lead-Generierung
Formulare
Automatisierung

Use cases

forms.app Use cases

Datenerfassung
Formular-Builder
Lead-Generierung
Umfrage-Ersteller
KI-Formulare
Bedingungslogik
Feedback-Formular
Online-Zahlungen
Quiz-Ersteller
Anmeldeformular

Jotform Use cases

Datenerfassung
Formular-Builder
Lead-Generierung
Umfrage-Ersteller
AgentAI
elektronische Signatur
HIPAA-Formulare
No-Code
Online-Formulare
Zahlungsformulare
Workflow-Automatisierung

forms.app vs Jotform:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth forms.app vs Jotform comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. forms.app is primarily listed under “Datenerfassung”, while Jotform is primarily listed under “Datenerfassung”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (forms.app: 1.1M; Jotform: 42.1M); Monthly growth (forms.app: -5.3%; Jotform: -3.3%); Favorites (forms.app: 138; Jotform: 116); Website (forms.app: forms.app; Jotform: www.jotform.com); Added (forms.app: 2025-08-16; Jotform: 2025-08-02). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the forms.app vs Jotform monthly traffic comparison, forms.app currently shows 1.1M visits and Jotform shows 42.1M; Jotform has about 38.5 times the visible traffic of forms.app, an absolute difference of about 41M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Jotform first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

forms.app and Jotform currently overlap in shared categories: Datenerfassung, Lead-Generierung und Formulare; shared tags: Datenerfassung, Formular-Builder, Lead-Generierung und Umfrage-Ersteller. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

forms.app's unique categories/tags are Feedback, KI-Formulare, Bedingungslogik, Feedback-Formular, Online-Zahlungen, Quiz-Ersteller und Anmeldeformular; Jotform's are Automatisierung, AgentAI, elektronische Signatur, HIPAA-Formulare, No-Code, Online-Formulare, Zahlungsformulare und Workflow-Automatisierung. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

forms.app has no verified rating, 0 comments, 138 favorites, and 121 likes;Jotform has no verified rating, 0 comments, 116 favorites, and 104 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate forms.app first

Put forms.app on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Datenerfassung” and especially Feedback, KI-Formulare, Bedingungslogik, Feedback-Formular, Online-Zahlungen und Quiz-Ersteller. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

forms.app also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 1.1M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Jotform first

Put Jotform on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Datenerfassung” and especially Automatisierung, AgentAI, elektronische Signatur, HIPAA-Formulare, No-Code und Online-Formulare. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Jotform also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 42.1M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in forms.app and Jotform, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between forms.app and Jotform?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.