ToolMage
Anmelden
Grapesjs
Website-Baukasten · 81.2K monatliche besuche

GrapesJS ist ein kostenloses Open-Source-Web-Builder-Framework zur Erstellung von responsiven Websites und Vorlagen. Es verfügt über einen intuitiven Drag-and-Drop-Editor, KI-gestützte Website-Generierung und vollständigen HTML/CSS-Code-Export, was es ideal für Entwickler und Designer macht.

VS
Maker
Low-Code/No-Code · 35.2K monatliche besuche

Maker ist ein KI-Codierungsagent, der Websites mit beispielloser Geschwindigkeit und Effizienz transformiert und erstellt. Er ermöglicht es Benutzern, produktionsreife Webseiten aus einfachen Prompts, Figma-Designs oder Bildern zu generieren, wodurch Markenkonsistenz und automatische Fehlerbehebung gewährleistet werden. Ideal zur Optimierung bestehender Websites oder zum Aufbau neuer ohne Codierung.

Grapesjs vs Maker: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Grapesjs und Maker nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Grapesjs Produktübersicht

GrapesJS ist ein kostenloses Open-Source-Web-Builder-Framework zur Erstellung von responsiven Websites und Vorlagen. Es verfügt über einen intuitiven Drag-and-Drop-Editor, KI-gestützte Website-Generierung und vollständigen HTML/CSS-Code-Export, was es ideal für Entwickler und Designer macht.

Preview

Maker Produktübersicht

Maker ist ein KI-Codierungsagent, der Websites mit beispielloser Geschwindigkeit und Effizienz transformiert und erstellt. Er ermöglicht es Benutzern, produktionsreife Webseiten aus einfachen Prompts, Figma-Designs oder Bildern zu generieren, wodurch Markenkonsistenz und automatische Fehlerbehebung gewährleistet werden. Ideal zur Optimierung bestehender Websites oder zum Aufbau neuer ohne Codierung.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureGrapesjsMaker
HauptkategorieWebsite-BaukastenLow-Code/No-Code
Hinzugefügt2025-10-222025-11-01
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitegrapesjs.comwww.maker.co
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche81.2K35.2K
Monatliches Wachstum-15.6%-1.2%
Favoriten123123
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Grapesjs vs Maker monthly traffic

Compare Grapesjs and Maker by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Grapesjs vs Maker monthly traffic comparison, Grapesjs currently shows 81.2K visits and Maker shows 35.2K; Grapesjs has about 2.3 times the visible traffic of Maker, an absolute difference of about 45.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Grapesjs monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
81.2K
Ø Besuchsdauer
0:56
Seiten pro Besuch
2.57
Absprungrate
39%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 106.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 135.5K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 113.3K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 104K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 96.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 81.2K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States36.4%29.5K
🇧🇷Brazil22.26%18.1K
🇻🇳Vietnam15.47%12.6K
🇮🇳India14.23%11.6K
🇬🇧United Kingdom11.64%9.4K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt93.57%76K
Verweis5.79%4.7K
E-Mail0.64%519

Suchbegriffe

grape jsgrapejsgrapejs aigrapes jsgrapesjs

Maker monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
35.2K
Ø Besuchsdauer
0:18
Seiten pro Besuch
2.11
Absprungrate
36.26%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/1: 37.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 36.7K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 35.5K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 35.7K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 35.2K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States45.33%16K
🇮🇳India19.54%6.9K
🇻🇳Vietnam16.29%5.7K
🇨🇦Canada9.53%3.4K
🇳🇬Nigeria9.31%3.3K

Suchbegriffe

herbert johnston mixermakermaker aimakeraimaker bio
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Grapesjs first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Grapesjs and Maker

Grapesjs Core features

Website-Baukasten
Landingpage-Builder
No-Code-Plattform

Maker Core features

Low-Code/No-Code
Landingpage-Optimierung
Website-Baukasten

Use cases

Grapesjs Use cases

KI-Website-Baukasten
No-Code
Webentwicklung
Drag & Drop
Einbettbarer Editor
HTML-Editor
Landingpage
Open Source
Vorlagen-Editor
Website-Baukasten

Maker Use cases

KI-Website-Baukasten
No-Code
Webentwicklung
KI-Codierungsagent
Markenkonsistenz
Inhaltserstellung
E-Commerce
Figma zu Web
Landingpage-Optimierung
Low-Code
Marketing
Weboptimierung
Webdesign

Best suited roles

Grapesjs Best suited roles

Content Creator
Marketing Manager
Produktmanager
Webdesigner
Kleinunternehmer
Softwareentwickler

Maker Best suited roles

Content Creator
Marketing Manager
Produktmanager
Webdesigner
Direktor für digitale Produkte
E-Commerce-Spezialist
Webentwickler

Grapesjs vs Maker:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Grapesjs vs Maker comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Grapesjs is primarily listed under “Website-Baukasten”, while Maker is primarily listed under “Low-Code/No-Code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Grapesjs: Website-Baukasten; Maker: Low-Code/No-Code); Monthly visits (Grapesjs: 81.2K; Maker: 35.2K); Monthly growth (Grapesjs: -15.6%; Maker: -1.2%); Website (Grapesjs: grapesjs.com; Maker: www.maker.co); Added (Grapesjs: 2025-10-22; Maker: 2025-11-01). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Grapesjs vs Maker monthly traffic comparison, Grapesjs currently shows 81.2K visits and Maker shows 35.2K; Grapesjs has about 2.3 times the visible traffic of Maker, an absolute difference of about 45.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Grapesjs first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Grapesjs and Maker currently overlap in shared tags: KI-Website-Baukasten, No-Code und Webentwicklung; shared roles: Content Creator, Marketing Manager, Produktmanager und Webdesigner. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Grapesjs's unique categories/tags are Website-Baukasten, Landingpage-Builder, No-Code-Plattform, Drag & Drop, Einbettbarer Editor, HTML-Editor, Landingpage und Open Source; Maker's are Low-Code/No-Code, Landingpage-Optimierung, Website-Baukasten, KI-Codierungsagent, Markenkonsistenz, Inhaltserstellung, E-Commerce und Figma zu Web. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Grapesjs has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 113 likes;Maker has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 111 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Grapesjs first

Put Grapesjs on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Website-Baukasten” and especially Website-Baukasten, Landingpage-Builder, No-Code-Plattform, Drag & Drop, Einbettbarer Editor und HTML-Editor, or the users include Kleinunternehmer und Softwareentwickler. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Grapesjs also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 81.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Maker first

Put Maker on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Low-Code/No-Code” and especially Low-Code/No-Code, Landingpage-Optimierung, Website-Baukasten, KI-Codierungsagent, Markenkonsistenz und Inhaltserstellung, or the users include Direktor für digitale Produkte, E-Commerce-Spezialist und Webentwickler. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Maker also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 35.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Grapesjs and Maker, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Grapesjs and Maker?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.

Gesponserte Tools

Discover more tools in the same category.

Jyek
AD

Jyek

Jyek ist eine KI-Agenten-Plattform, die Ziele versteht, Ausführungspläne erstellt, Werkzeuge nutzt und überprüfbare Ergebnisse für komplexe, mehrstufige Aufgaben liefert.

Automatisierung
Visits 1.8KFavorites 1Likes 1