GrapesJS ist ein kostenloses Open-Source-Web-Builder-Framework zur Erstellung von responsiven Websites und Vorlagen. Es verfügt über einen intuitiven Drag-and-Drop-Editor, KI-gestützte Website-Generierung und vollständigen HTML/CSS-Code-Export, was es ideal für Entwickler und Designer macht.
Maker ist ein KI-Codierungsagent, der Websites mit beispielloser Geschwindigkeit und Effizienz transformiert und erstellt. Er ermöglicht es Benutzern, produktionsreife Webseiten aus einfachen Prompts, Figma-Designs oder Bildern zu generieren, wodurch Markenkonsistenz und automatische Fehlerbehebung gewährleistet werden. Ideal zur Optimierung bestehender Websites oder zum Aufbau neuer ohne Codierung.
Produktübersicht
Grapesjs Produktübersicht
GrapesJS ist ein kostenloses Open-Source-Web-Builder-Framework zur Erstellung von responsiven Websites und Vorlagen. Es verfügt über einen intuitiven Drag-and-Drop-Editor, KI-gestützte Website-Generierung und vollständigen HTML/CSS-Code-Export, was es ideal für Entwickler und Designer macht.
Maker Produktübersicht
Maker ist ein KI-Codierungsagent, der Websites mit beispielloser Geschwindigkeit und Effizienz transformiert und erstellt. Er ermöglicht es Benutzern, produktionsreife Webseiten aus einfachen Prompts, Figma-Designs oder Bildern zu generieren, wodurch Markenkonsistenz und automatische Fehlerbehebung gewährleistet werden. Ideal zur Optimierung bestehender Websites oder zum Aufbau neuer ohne Codierung.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Grapesjs | Maker |
|---|---|---|
| Hauptkategorie | Website-Baukasten | Low-Code/No-Code |
| Hinzugefügt | 2025-10-22 | 2025-11-01 |
| Preismodell | Freemium | Freemium |
| Offizielle Website | grapesjs.com | www.maker.co |
| Produkttyp | Website | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| Nutzerbewertung | Nicht verifiziert | Nicht verifiziert |
| Kommentare | 0 | 0 |
| Monatliche Besuche | 81.2K | 35.2K |
| Monatliches Wachstum | -15.6% | -1.2% |
| Favoriten | 123 | 123 |
| Details | Details ansehen | Details ansehen |
Grapesjs vs Maker monthly traffic
Compare Grapesjs and Maker by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Grapesjs vs Maker monthly traffic comparison, Grapesjs currently shows 81.2K visits and Maker shows 35.2K; Grapesjs has about 2.3 times the visible traffic of Maker, an absolute difference of about 45.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Grapesjs monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 106.2K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/1: 135.5K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/2: 113.3K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/3: 104K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/4: 96.2K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/5: 81.2K Monatliche Besuche
Top-Regionen
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 36.4% | 29.5K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 22.26% | 18.1K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 15.47% | 12.6K |
| 🇮🇳India | 14.23% | 11.6K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 11.64% | 9.4K |
Traffic-Quellen
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direkt | 93.57% | 76K |
| Verweis | 5.79% | 4.7K |
| 0.64% | 519 |
Suchbegriffe
Maker monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 37.2K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/2: 36.7K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/3: 35.5K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/4: 35.7K Monatliche Besuche
- 2026/5: 35.2K Monatliche Besuche
Top-Regionen
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 45.33% | 16K |
| 🇮🇳India | 19.54% | 6.9K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 16.29% | 5.7K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 9.53% | 3.4K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 9.31% | 3.3K |
Suchbegriffe
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Grapesjs and Maker
Grapesjs Core features
Maker Core features
Use cases
Grapesjs Use cases
Maker Use cases
Best suited roles
Grapesjs Best suited roles
Maker Best suited roles
Grapesjs vs Maker:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Grapesjs vs Maker comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Grapesjs is primarily listed under “Website-Baukasten”, while Maker is primarily listed under “Low-Code/No-Code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Grapesjs: Website-Baukasten; Maker: Low-Code/No-Code); Monthly visits (Grapesjs: 81.2K; Maker: 35.2K); Monthly growth (Grapesjs: -15.6%; Maker: -1.2%); Website (Grapesjs: grapesjs.com; Maker: www.maker.co); Added (Grapesjs: 2025-10-22; Maker: 2025-11-01). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Grapesjs vs Maker monthly traffic comparison, Grapesjs currently shows 81.2K visits and Maker shows 35.2K; Grapesjs has about 2.3 times the visible traffic of Maker, an absolute difference of about 45.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Grapesjs first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Grapesjs and Maker currently overlap in shared tags: KI-Website-Baukasten, No-Code und Webentwicklung; shared roles: Content Creator, Marketing Manager, Produktmanager und Webdesigner. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Grapesjs's unique categories/tags are Website-Baukasten, Landingpage-Builder, No-Code-Plattform, Drag & Drop, Einbettbarer Editor, HTML-Editor, Landingpage und Open Source; Maker's are Low-Code/No-Code, Landingpage-Optimierung, Website-Baukasten, KI-Codierungsagent, Markenkonsistenz, Inhaltserstellung, E-Commerce und Figma zu Web. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Grapesjs has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 113 likes;Maker has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 111 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Grapesjs first
Put Grapesjs on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Website-Baukasten” and especially Website-Baukasten, Landingpage-Builder, No-Code-Plattform, Drag & Drop, Einbettbarer Editor und HTML-Editor, or the users include Kleinunternehmer und Softwareentwickler. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Grapesjs also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 81.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Maker first
Put Maker on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Low-Code/No-Code” and especially Low-Code/No-Code, Landingpage-Optimierung, Website-Baukasten, KI-Codierungsagent, Markenkonsistenz und Inhaltserstellung, or the users include Direktor für digitale Produkte, E-Commerce-Spezialist und Webentwickler. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Maker also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 35.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Grapesjs and Maker, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
Vergleichs-FAQ
How should I choose between Grapesjs and Maker?
Where does this comparison data come from?
What do unknown fields mean?
Gesponserte Tools
Discover more tools in the same category.

Jyek
Jyek ist eine KI-Agenten-Plattform, die Ziele versteht, Ausführungspläne erstellt, Werkzeuge nutzt und überprüfbare Ergebnisse für komplexe, mehrstufige Aufgaben liefert.
Automatisierung



