ToolMage
Anmelden
Miro
Brainstorming · 31M monatliche besuche

Miro ist eine KI-gestützte Online-Kollaborations-Whiteboard-Plattform für moderne Teams. Es bietet eine unendliche Leinwand für Brainstorming, Planung, Design und Projektmanagement in Echtzeit. Mit einer riesigen Vorlagenbibliothek, leistungsstarken Integrationen und KI-gesteuerten Funktionen hilft Miro Teams, die Kommunikation zu zentralisieren und Innovationen von der Idee bis zur Umsetzung zu beschleunigen.

VS
Slack
Projektmanagement · 129.1M monatliche besuche

Slack ist ein KI-gestützter Kollaborations-Hub, der Ihre Mitarbeiter, Partner und Tools verbindet. Es ersetzt E-Mails durch schnellere, besser organisierte Kommunikation über Kanäle. Mit integrierter KI, Workflow-Automatisierung und Tausenden von Apps zentralisiert Slack Ihre Arbeit, um die Produktivität zu steigern und das Projektmanagement zu optimieren.

Miro vs Slack: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Miro und Slack nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Miro Produktübersicht

Miro ist eine KI-gestützte Online-Kollaborations-Whiteboard-Plattform für moderne Teams. Es bietet eine unendliche Leinwand für Brainstorming, Planung, Design und Projektmanagement in Echtzeit. Mit einer riesigen Vorlagenbibliothek, leistungsstarken Integrationen und KI-gesteuerten Funktionen hilft Miro Teams, die Kommunikation zu zentralisieren und Innovationen von der Idee bis zur Umsetzung zu beschleunigen.

Preview

Slack Produktübersicht

Slack ist ein KI-gestützter Kollaborations-Hub, der Ihre Mitarbeiter, Partner und Tools verbindet. Es ersetzt E-Mails durch schnellere, besser organisierte Kommunikation über Kanäle. Mit integrierter KI, Workflow-Automatisierung und Tausenden von Apps zentralisiert Slack Ihre Arbeit, um die Produktivität zu steigern und das Projektmanagement zu optimieren.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureMiroSlack
HauptkategorieBrainstormingProjektmanagement
Hinzugefügt2025-09-082025-09-17
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitemiro.comslack.com
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche31M129.1M
Monatliches Wachstum-5.1%-5.1%
Favoriten107108
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Miro vs Slack monthly traffic

Compare Miro and Slack by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Miro vs Slack monthly traffic comparison, Miro currently shows 31M visits and Slack shows 129.1M; Slack has about 4.2 times the visible traffic of Miro, an absolute difference of about 98.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Miro monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
31M
Ø Besuchsdauer
3:23
Seiten pro Besuch
2.98
Absprungrate
50.32%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 31.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 29.8M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 30M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 34.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 32.7M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 31M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States32.34%10M
🇷🇺Russia26.41%8.2M
🇩🇪Germany15.38%4.8M
🇬🇧United Kingdom13.32%4.1M
🇧🇷Brazil12.55%3.9M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt85.84%26.6M
Verweis9.79%3M
E-Mail4.37%1.4M

Suchbegriffe

mapa conceptualmapa mentalmiromiro boardмиро

Slack monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
129.1M
Ø Besuchsdauer
15:45
Seiten pro Besuch
8.23
Absprungrate
28.2%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 133.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 127M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 122.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 139M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 136.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 129.1M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States50.24%64.9M
🇯🇵Japan31.8%41.1M
🇮🇳India8.46%10.9M
🇬🇧United Kingdom5.07%6.5M
🇵🇭Philippines4.43%5.7M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt92.92%120M
Verweis3.9%5M
E-Mail3.18%4.1M

Suchbegriffe

슬랙slackslack downloadslack loginスラック
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Slack first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Miro and Slack

Miro Core features

Zusammenarbeit
Brainstorming
Prototyping
Visuelles Management

Slack Core features

Zusammenarbeit
Projektmanagement
Team-Chat

Use cases

Miro Use cases

Kollaboration
Projektmanagement
Remote-Arbeit
Agil
KI-gestützt
Brainstorming
Diagrammerstellung
Innovation
Mindmapping
Prototyping
UX Design
Visueller Arbeitsbereich
Whiteboard

Slack Use cases

Kollaboration
Projektmanagement
Remote-Arbeit
KI-Assistent
Business Messaging
Unternehmenssoftware
Integration
Wissensmanagement
Produktivität
Teamkommunikation
Workflow-Automatisierung

Best suited roles

Miro Best suited roles

Marketing Manager
Produktmanager
Projektmanager
Softwareentwickler
Teamleiter
Agile Coach
Berater
Moderator
IT-Manager
Forscher
Stratege
UX/UI Designer

Slack Best suited roles

Marketing Manager
Produktmanager
Projektmanager
Softwareentwickler
Teamleiter
Kundensupport
Datenanalyst
Grafikdesigner
Personalmanager
Vertriebsmitarbeiter

Miro vs Slack:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Miro vs Slack comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Miro is primarily listed under “Brainstorming”, while Slack is primarily listed under “Projektmanagement”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Miro: Brainstorming; Slack: Projektmanagement); Monthly visits (Miro: 31M; Slack: 129.1M); Favorites (Miro: 107; Slack: 108); Website (Miro: miro.com; Slack: slack.com); Added (Miro: 2025-09-08; Slack: 2025-09-17). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Miro vs Slack monthly traffic comparison, Miro currently shows 31M visits and Slack shows 129.1M; Slack has about 4.2 times the visible traffic of Miro, an absolute difference of about 98.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Slack first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Miro and Slack currently overlap in shared categories: Zusammenarbeit; shared tags: Kollaboration, Projektmanagement und Remote-Arbeit; shared roles: Marketing Manager, Produktmanager, Projektmanager, Softwareentwickler und Teamleiter. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Miro's unique categories/tags are Brainstorming, Prototyping, Visuelles Management, Agil, KI-gestützt, Diagrammerstellung, Innovation und Mindmapping; Slack's are Projektmanagement, Team-Chat, KI-Assistent, Business Messaging, Unternehmenssoftware, Integration, Wissensmanagement und Produktivität. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Miro has no verified rating, 0 comments, 107 favorites, and 106 likes;Slack has no verified rating, 0 comments, 108 favorites, and 96 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Miro first

Put Miro on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Brainstorming” and especially Brainstorming, Prototyping, Visuelles Management, Agil, KI-gestützt und Diagrammerstellung, or the users include Agile Coach, Berater, Moderator und IT-Manager. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Miro also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 31M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Slack first

Put Slack on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Projektmanagement” and especially Projektmanagement, Team-Chat, KI-Assistent, Business Messaging, Unternehmenssoftware und Integration, or the users include Kundensupport, Datenanalyst, Grafikdesigner und Personalmanager. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Slack also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 129.1M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Miro and Slack, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Miro and Slack?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.