ToolMage
Anmelden
Polycam
3D-Modellierung · 617.7K monatliche besuche

Polycam ist eine führende 3D-Erfassungsanwendung für iOS, Android und Web, die LiDAR und Photogrammetrie zur Erstellung hochwertiger 3D-Modelle, Grundrisse und Drohnenkarten verwendet. Sie ist für Fachleute aus Architektur, Bauwesen, Immobilien und E-Commerce sowie für Kreative und Hobbyisten konzipiert.

VS
Unity
3D-Modellierung · 8.7M monatliche besuche

Unity ist die weltweit führende Echtzeit-3D-Entwicklungsplattform zur Erstellung und zum Betrieb interaktiver Inhalte. Sie befähigt Kreative aus allen Branchen, von Spielen und Film bis hin zu Automobil und Architektur, immersive Erlebnisse für über 20 Plattformen zu schaffen, darunter PC, Mobilgeräte, Konsolen, VR und AR.

Polycam vs Unity: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Polycam und Unity nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Polycam Produktübersicht

Polycam ist eine führende 3D-Erfassungsanwendung für iOS, Android und Web, die LiDAR und Photogrammetrie zur Erstellung hochwertiger 3D-Modelle, Grundrisse und Drohnenkarten verwendet. Sie ist für Fachleute aus Architektur, Bauwesen, Immobilien und E-Commerce sowie für Kreative und Hobbyisten konzipiert.

Preview

Unity Produktübersicht

Unity ist die weltweit führende Echtzeit-3D-Entwicklungsplattform zur Erstellung und zum Betrieb interaktiver Inhalte. Sie befähigt Kreative aus allen Branchen, von Spielen und Film bis hin zu Automobil und Architektur, immersive Erlebnisse für über 20 Plattformen zu schaffen, darunter PC, Mobilgeräte, Konsolen, VR und AR.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeaturePolycamUnity
Hauptkategorie3D-Modellierung3D-Modellierung
Hinzugefügt2025-08-042025-08-03
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitepoly.camunity.com
ProdukttypAppApp
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche617.7K8.7M
Monatliches Wachstum10.7%5.5%
Favoriten124112
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Polycam vs Unity monthly traffic

Compare Polycam and Unity by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Polycam vs Unity monthly traffic comparison, Polycam currently shows 617.7K visits and Unity shows 8.7M; Unity has about 14.1 times the visible traffic of Polycam, an absolute difference of about 8.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Unity is registered at the unity.com/cn subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Polycam monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
617.7K
Ø Besuchsdauer
2:05
Seiten pro Besuch
3.62
Absprungrate
42.11%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 519.4K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 622.3K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 520.3K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 559.1K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 557.7K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 617.7K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States66.04%407.9K
🇬🇧United Kingdom10.65%65.8K
🇳🇱Netherlands8.86%54.7K
🇫🇷France7.54%46.6K
🇩🇪Germany6.91%42.7K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt84.39%521.2K
Verweis10.2%63K
E-Mail5.41%33.4K

Suchbegriffe

3d gaussian splattingfl studio crackgaussian splattingpolycampolycam 3d

Unity monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
8.7M
Ø Besuchsdauer
4:58
Seiten pro Besuch
6.73
Absprungrate
31.59%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/2: 8.3M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 8.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 8.3M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 8.7M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States44.19%3.9M
🇮🇳India15.88%1.4M
🇰🇷Korea, Republic of13.73%1.2M
🇨🇳China13.25%1.2M
🇹🇷Turkey12.95%1.1M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt84.28%7.4M
Verweis13.71%1.2M
E-Mail2.01%175.7K

Suchbegriffe

unityunity aiunity asset storeunity downloadunity hub
Traffic-based selection guidance: Unity is registered under a unity.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Unity for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Polycam and Unity

Polycam Core features

3D-Modellierung
Architektur
Scannen

Unity Core features

3D-Modellierung
Entwicklung
Spiel-Engine
Zusammenarbeit

Use cases

Polycam Use cases

3D-Modellierung
3D-Scannen
Architektur, Ingenieurwesen und Bauwesen
Drohnenkartierung
Grundriss
Spiel-Assets
glTF
LIDAR
Photogrammetrie
Immobilien
Realitätserfassung
USDZ

Unity Use cases

3D-Engine
AR-Entwicklung
plattformübergreifend
C#-Scripting
Digitaler Zwilling
Spieleentwicklung
Spielmonetarisierung
Industriesimulation
Echtzeit-3D
VR-Entwicklung

Polycam vs Unity:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Polycam vs Unity comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Polycam is primarily listed under “3D-Modellierung”, while Unity is primarily listed under “3D-Modellierung”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (Polycam: 617.7K; Unity: 8.7M); Monthly growth (Polycam: 10.7%; Unity: 5.5%); Favorites (Polycam: 124; Unity: 112); Website (Polycam: poly.cam; Unity: unity.com); Added (Polycam: 2025-08-04; Unity: 2025-08-03). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Polycam vs Unity monthly traffic comparison, Polycam currently shows 617.7K visits and Unity shows 8.7M; Unity has about 14.1 times the visible traffic of Polycam, an absolute difference of about 8.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Unity is registered at the unity.com/cn subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Unity is registered under a unity.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Unity for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Polycam and Unity currently overlap in shared categories: 3D-Modellierung. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Polycam's unique categories/tags are Architektur, Scannen, 3D-Modellierung, 3D-Scannen, Architektur, Ingenieurwesen und Bauwesen, Drohnenkartierung, Grundriss und Spiel-Assets; Unity's are Entwicklung, Spiel-Engine, Zusammenarbeit, 3D-Engine, AR-Entwicklung, plattformübergreifend, C#-Scripting und Digitaler Zwilling. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Polycam has no verified rating, 0 comments, 124 favorites, and 133 likes;Unity has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 115 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Polycam first

Put Polycam on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D-Modellierung” and especially Architektur, Scannen, 3D-Modellierung, 3D-Scannen, Architektur, Ingenieurwesen und Bauwesen und Drohnenkartierung. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Polycam also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 617.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Unity first

Put Unity on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D-Modellierung” and especially Entwicklung, Spiel-Engine, Zusammenarbeit, 3D-Engine, AR-Entwicklung und plattformübergreifend. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Unity also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 8.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Polycam and Unity, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Polycam and Unity?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.