Immich ist eine leistungsstarke, quelloffene und selbst gehostete Lösung zur Sicherung von Fotos und Videos. Es dient als private, funktionsreiche Alternative zu Cloud-Diensten wie Google Fotos und bietet KI-gestützte Funktionen wie Gesichtserkennung, Objekterkennung und semantische Suche, während Sie die volle Kontrolle und das Eigentum an Ihren persönlichen Medien behalten.
Reeflex bietet ein komplettes Ökosystem für mobile Content-Ersteller, das professionelle G-Serien-Objektive und eine Suite von KI-gestützten Kamera-Apps umfasst. Verwandeln Sie Ihr iPhone oder Samsung in ein professionelles Kraftpaket für Fotografie und Videografie, um atemberaubende RAW-Bilder, Langzeitbelichtungen und filmische Videos aufzunehmen.
Immich ist eine leistungsstarke, quelloffene und selbst gehostete Lösung zur Sicherung von Fotos und Videos. Es dient als private, funktionsreiche Alternative zu Cloud-Diensten wie Google Fotos und bietet KI-gestützte Funktionen wie Gesichtserkennung, Objekterkennung und semantische Suche, während Sie die volle Kontrolle und das Eigentum an Ihren persönlichen Medien behalten.
Reeflex bietet ein komplettes Ökosystem für mobile Content-Ersteller, das professionelle G-Serien-Objektive und eine Suite von KI-gestützten Kamera-Apps umfasst. Verwandeln Sie Ihr iPhone oder Samsung in ein professionelles Kraftpaket für Fotografie und Videografie, um atemberaubende RAW-Bilder, Langzeitbelichtungen und filmische Videos aufzunehmen.
| Feature | Immich | Reeflex |
|---|---|---|
| Hauptkategorie | Selbst gehostet | Hardware |
| Hinzugefügt | 2025-08-02 | 2025-08-07 |
| Preismodell | Kostenlos | Kostenpflichtig |
| Offizielle Website | immich.app | reeflexstore.com |
| Produkttyp | App | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| Nutzerbewertung | Nicht verifiziert | Nicht verifiziert |
| Kommentare | 0 | 0 |
| Monatliche Besuche | 616.4K | 63.1K |
| Monatliches Wachstum | -0.6% | -2% |
| Favoriten | 113 | 80 |
| Details | Details ansehen | Details ansehen |
Compare Immich and Reeflex by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the Immich vs Reeflex monthly traffic comparison, Immich currently shows 616.4K visits and Reeflex shows 63.1K; Immich has about 9.8 times the visible traffic of Reeflex, an absolute difference of about 553.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 40.67% | 250.7K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 26.63% | 164.2K |
| 🇨🇳China | 20.31% | 125.2K |
| 🇫🇷France | 6.47% | 39.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 5.92% | 36.5K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direkt | 68.89% | 424.7K |
| Verweis | 29.08% | 179.3K |
| 2.03% | 12.5K |
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 45.38% | 28.6K |
| 🇮🇳India | 15.42% | 9.7K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 14.98% | 9.4K |
| 🇮🇹Italy | 13.4% | 8.5K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 10.82% | 6.8K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direkt | 80.16% | 50.6K |
| Verweis | 14.72% | 9.3K |
| 5.12% | 3.2K |
This in-depth Immich vs Reeflex comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Immich is primarily listed under “Selbst gehostet”, while Reeflex is primarily listed under “Hardware”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Immich: Selbst gehostet; Reeflex: Hardware); Product type (Immich: App; Reeflex: Website); Pricing (Immich: Free; Reeflex: Paid); Monthly visits (Immich: 616.4K; Reeflex: 63.1K); Monthly growth (Immich: -0.6%; Reeflex: -2%). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the Immich vs Reeflex monthly traffic comparison, Immich currently shows 616.4K visits and Reeflex shows 63.1K; Immich has about 9.8 times the visible traffic of Reeflex, an absolute difference of about 553.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Immich first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Immich and Reeflex currently overlap in shared categories: Dateiverwaltung; shared tags: Fotoverwaltung. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Immich's unique categories/tags are Selbst gehostet, Fotoverwaltung, Datenspeicherung, KI-Fotosuche, Dateneigentum, Docker, Gesichtserkennung und Google Fotos Alternative; Reeflex's are Hardware, Mobile Fotografie, KI-Kamera, Kameraobjektiv, Computergestützte Fotografie, iPhone-Fotografie, Langzeitbelichtung und RAW-Fotografie. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
Immich has no verified rating, 0 comments, 113 favorites, and 102 likes；Reeflex has no verified rating, 0 comments, 80 favorites, and 70 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put Immich on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Selbst gehostet” and especially Selbst gehostet, Fotoverwaltung, Datenspeicherung, KI-Fotosuche, Dateneigentum und Docker. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Immich also currently records: pricing is free, product type is app, 616.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Reeflex on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Hardware” and especially Hardware, Mobile Fotografie, KI-Kamera, Kameraobjektiv, Computergestützte Fotografie und iPhone-Fotografie. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Reeflex also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 63.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Immich and Reeflex, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
