ToolMage
Anmelden
Rivet
Backend · 3.4K monatliche besuche

Rivet ist eine Open-Source-Bibliothek für Entwickler, die skalierbare Echtzeitanwendungen mit dauerhaftem Zustand erstellen. Es bietet langlebige, zustandsbehaftete Recheneinheiten, sogenannte "Actors", die komplexe Aufgaben wie die Erstellung von KI-Agenten, kollaborativen Apps und Multiplayer-Spielen vereinfachen. Mit Funktionen wie integrierter Echtzeitkommunikation, Fehlertoleranz und Edge-Bereitstellung bietet Rivet eine leistungsstarke, selbst hostbare Alternative zu Diensten wie Cloudflare Durable Objects.

Website besuchenDetails ansehen
VS
Supabase
Backend · 29.3M monatliche besuche

Supabase ist eine Open-Source-Alternative zu Firebase und bietet eine komplette Backend-Lösung auf Basis von Postgres. Es bietet eine Reihe von Tools, darunter eine Datenbank, Authentifizierung, sofortige APIs, Edge-Funktionen, Echtzeit-Abonnements, Speicher und Vektor-Embeddings, um die Anwendungsentwicklung vom Prototyp bis zur Produktion zu beschleunigen.

Website besuchenDetails ansehen

Rivet vs Supabase: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Rivet und Supabase nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Rivet Produktübersicht

Rivet ist eine Open-Source-Bibliothek für Entwickler, die skalierbare Echtzeitanwendungen mit dauerhaftem Zustand erstellen. Es bietet langlebige, zustandsbehaftete Recheneinheiten, sogenannte "Actors", die komplexe Aufgaben wie die Erstellung von KI-Agenten, kollaborativen Apps und Multiplayer-Spielen vereinfachen. Mit Funktionen wie integrierter Echtzeitkommunikation, Fehlertoleranz und Edge-Bereitstellung bietet Rivet eine leistungsstarke, selbst hostbare Alternative zu Diensten wie Cloudflare Durable Objects.

Preview

Supabase Produktübersicht

Supabase ist eine Open-Source-Alternative zu Firebase und bietet eine komplette Backend-Lösung auf Basis von Postgres. Es bietet eine Reihe von Tools, darunter eine Datenbank, Authentifizierung, sofortige APIs, Edge-Funktionen, Echtzeit-Abonnements, Speicher und Vektor-Embeddings, um die Anwendungsentwicklung vom Prototyp bis zur Produktion zu beschleunigen.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureRivetSupabase
HauptkategorieBackendBackend
Hinzugefügt2025-08-042025-08-10
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitewww.rivet.ggsupabase.com
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche3.4K29.3M
Monatliches WachstumNicht verifiziert11.7%
Favoriten100125
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Rivet vs Supabase monthly traffic

Compare Rivet and Supabase by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Rivet vs Supabase monthly traffic comparison, Rivet currently shows 3.4K visits and Supabase shows 29.3M; Supabase has about 8,613.9 times the visible traffic of Rivet, an absolute difference of about 29.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Supabase has complete third-party traffic details; Rivet uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Rivet monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
3.4K

Supabase monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
29.3M
Ø Besuchsdauer
9:51
Seiten pro Besuch
10.22
Absprungrate
25.08%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 13.8M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 18.6M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 20.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 25.3M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 26.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 29.3M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States47.42%13.9M
🇮🇳India23%6.7M
🇧🇷Brazil13.44%3.9M
🇬🇧United Kingdom8.16%2.4M
🇵🇰Pakistan7.98%2.3M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt94.28%27.6M
Verweis3.43%1M
E-Mail2.29%669.9K

Suchbegriffe

supa basesupabasesupabase loginsupabase pricingsuperbase
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Rivet and Supabase

Rivet Core features

Backend
Bibliotheken und Frameworks
Serverless
Zusammenarbeit

Supabase Core features

Backend
Datenbank
Plattform als Dienst
No-Code & Low-Code

Use cases

Rivet Use cases

Entwicklerwerkzeuge
Open Source
Serverless
KI-Agent
Backend
Dauerhafte Objekte
Node.js
Echtzeit
Zustandsbehaftet
TypeScript
WebSocket

Supabase Use cases

Entwicklerwerkzeuge
Open Source
Serverless
KI
Authentifizierung
BaaS
Backend als Dienst
Datenbank
Firebase-Alternative
Postgres
Vektordatenbank

Rivet vs Supabase：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Rivet vs Supabase comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Rivet is primarily listed under “Backend”, while Supabase is primarily listed under “Backend”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (Rivet: 3.4K; Supabase: 29.3M); Favorites (Rivet: 100; Supabase: 125); Website (Rivet: www.rivet.gg; Supabase: supabase.com); Added (Rivet: 2025-08-04; Supabase: 2025-08-10). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Rivet vs Supabase monthly traffic comparison, Rivet currently shows 3.4K visits and Supabase shows 29.3M; Supabase has about 8,613.9 times the visible traffic of Rivet, an absolute difference of about 29.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Supabase has complete third-party traffic details; Rivet uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Rivet and Supabase currently overlap in shared categories: Backend; shared tags: Entwicklerwerkzeuge, Open Source und Serverless. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Rivet's unique categories/tags are Bibliotheken und Frameworks, Serverless, Zusammenarbeit, KI-Agent, Backend, Dauerhafte Objekte, Node.js und Echtzeit; Supabase's are Datenbank, Plattform als Dienst, No-Code & Low-Code, KI, Authentifizierung, BaaS, Backend als Dienst und Firebase-Alternative. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Rivet has no verified rating, 0 comments, 100 favorites, and 110 likes；Supabase has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 136 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Rivet first

Put Rivet on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Backend” and especially Bibliotheken und Frameworks, Serverless, Zusammenarbeit, KI-Agent, Backend und Dauerhafte Objekte. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Rivet also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Supabase first

Put Supabase on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Backend” and especially Datenbank, Plattform als Dienst, No-Code & Low-Code, KI, Authentifizierung und BaaS. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Supabase also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 29.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Rivet and Supabase, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Rivet and Supabase?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.

Gesponserte Tools

Discover more tools in the same category.

Jyek
AD

Jyek

Jyek ist eine KI-Agenten-Plattform, die Ziele versteht, Ausführungspläne erstellt, Werkzeuge nutzt und überprüfbare Ergebnisse für komplexe, mehrstufige Aufgaben liefert.

Automatisierung
Visits 1.8KFavorites 1Likes 1