ToolMage
Anmelden
Loom
Teammanagement · 17.4M monatliche besuche

Loom ist eine KI-gestützte Videonachrichten-Plattform für die Arbeit, die es Benutzern ermöglicht, ihren Bildschirm, ihre Kamera und ihr Audio sofort aufzuzeichnen und zu teilen. Sie optimiert die Kommunikation, reduziert Meetings und verbessert die Teamzusammenarbeit mit Funktionen wie KI-gestützten Zusammenfassungen, Transkriptionen und Bearbeitungswerkzeugen.

VS
Zoom
Besprechungsmanagement · 87.9M monatliche besuche

Zoom ist eine KI-gestützte, einheitliche Kollaborationsplattform, die Menschen durch Videomeetings, Telefonanrufe, Team-Chat, Webinare und mehr verbindet. Mit dem AI Companion optimiert sie Arbeitsabläufe, fasst Meetings zusammen und steigert die Produktivität für Remote- und Hybrid-Teams in allen Branchen.

Loom vs Zoom: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Loom und Zoom nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Loom Produktübersicht

Loom ist eine KI-gestützte Videonachrichten-Plattform für die Arbeit, die es Benutzern ermöglicht, ihren Bildschirm, ihre Kamera und ihr Audio sofort aufzuzeichnen und zu teilen. Sie optimiert die Kommunikation, reduziert Meetings und verbessert die Teamzusammenarbeit mit Funktionen wie KI-gestützten Zusammenfassungen, Transkriptionen und Bearbeitungswerkzeugen.

Preview

Zoom Produktübersicht

Zoom ist eine KI-gestützte, einheitliche Kollaborationsplattform, die Menschen durch Videomeetings, Telefonanrufe, Team-Chat, Webinare und mehr verbindet. Mit dem AI Companion optimiert sie Arbeitsabläufe, fasst Meetings zusammen und steigert die Produktivität für Remote- und Hybrid-Teams in allen Branchen.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureLoomZoom
HauptkategorieTeammanagementBesprechungsmanagement
Hinzugefügt2025-09-082025-09-10
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websiteloom.comzoom.com
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche17.4M87.9M
Monatliches Wachstum-7.6%104.9%
Favoriten135118
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Loom vs Zoom monthly traffic

Compare Loom and Zoom by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Loom vs Zoom monthly traffic comparison, Loom currently shows 17.4M visits and Zoom shows 87.9M; Zoom has about 5.1 times the visible traffic of Loom, an absolute difference of about 70.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Loom monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
17.4M
Ø Besuchsdauer
4:11
Seiten pro Besuch
3.15
Absprungrate
52.96%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 17.7M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 19.6M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 19.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 20.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 18.8M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 17.4M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States68.39%11.9M
🇵🇭Philippines8.92%1.5M
🇬🇧United Kingdom8.66%1.5M
🇦🇺Australia7.55%1.3M
🇮🇳India6.48%1.1M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt85.42%14.8M
Verweis10.42%1.8M
E-Mail4.16%721.8K

Suchbegriffe

loomloom desktop apploom downloadloom loginloom video

Zoom monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
87.9M
Ø Besuchsdauer
1:31
Seiten pro Besuch
1.66
Absprungrate
62.88%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 23.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 25M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 23.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 25.5M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 42.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 87.9M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States63.1%55.5M
🇯🇵Japan19.35%17M
🇮🇩Indonesia7.62%6.7M
🇬🇧United Kingdom5%4.4M
🇷🇺Russia4.93%4.3M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt85.83%75.4M
Verweis7.46%6.6M
E-Mail6.71%5.9M

Suchbegriffe

z oomzoomzoom downloadzoom meetingзум
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Zoom first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Loom and Zoom

Loom Core features

Zusammenarbeit
Teammanagement
Bildschirmaufnahme

Zoom Core features

Zusammenarbeit
Besprechungsmanagement
Videokonferenzen
Dokumentenmanagement

Use cases

Loom Use cases

Remote-Arbeit
Teamzusammenarbeit
KI-Videozusammenfassung
asynchrone Kommunikation
Atlassian
Meeting-Ersatz
Produktivitätstool
Bildschirmaufnahme
Video-Feedback
Videonachrichten

Zoom Use cases

Remote-Arbeit
Teamzusammenarbeit
KI-Assistent
KI-Begleiter
Online-Meetings
Unified Communications
Videokonferenz
virtuelle Meetings
Webinar
Zoom Workplace

Best suited roles

Loom Best suited roles

Content Creator
Kundensupport
Pädagoge
Personalmanager
Marketing Manager
Produktmanager
Vertriebsmitarbeiter
Softwareentwickler
Designer
Teamleiter

Zoom Best suited roles

Content Creator
Kundensupport
Pädagoge
Personalmanager
Marketing Manager
Produktmanager
Vertriebsmitarbeiter
Softwareentwickler
Geschäftsinhaber
Projektmanager

Loom vs Zoom:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Loom vs Zoom comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Loom is primarily listed under “Teammanagement”, while Zoom is primarily listed under “Besprechungsmanagement”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Loom: Teammanagement; Zoom: Besprechungsmanagement); Monthly visits (Loom: 17.4M; Zoom: 87.9M); Monthly growth (Loom: -7.6%; Zoom: 104.9%); Favorites (Loom: 135; Zoom: 118); Website (Loom: loom.com; Zoom: zoom.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Loom vs Zoom monthly traffic comparison, Loom currently shows 17.4M visits and Zoom shows 87.9M; Zoom has about 5.1 times the visible traffic of Loom, an absolute difference of about 70.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Zoom first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Loom and Zoom currently overlap in shared categories: Zusammenarbeit; shared tags: Remote-Arbeit und Teamzusammenarbeit; shared roles: Content Creator, Kundensupport, Pädagoge, Personalmanager, Marketing Manager, Produktmanager, Vertriebsmitarbeiter und Softwareentwickler. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Loom's unique categories/tags are Teammanagement, Bildschirmaufnahme, KI-Videozusammenfassung, asynchrone Kommunikation, Atlassian, Meeting-Ersatz, Produktivitätstool und Video-Feedback; Zoom's are Besprechungsmanagement, Videokonferenzen, Dokumentenmanagement, KI-Assistent, KI-Begleiter, Online-Meetings, Unified Communications und Videokonferenz. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Loom has no verified rating, 0 comments, 135 favorites, and 136 likes;Zoom has no verified rating, 0 comments, 118 favorites, and 116 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Loom first

Put Loom on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Teammanagement” and especially Teammanagement, Bildschirmaufnahme, KI-Videozusammenfassung, asynchrone Kommunikation, Atlassian und Meeting-Ersatz, or the users include Designer und Teamleiter. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Loom also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 17.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Zoom first

Put Zoom on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Besprechungsmanagement” and especially Besprechungsmanagement, Videokonferenzen, Dokumentenmanagement, KI-Assistent, KI-Begleiter und Online-Meetings, or the users include Geschäftsinhaber und Projektmanager. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Zoom also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 87.9M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Loom and Zoom, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Loom and Zoom?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.