ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
Agentary
Computación en el Borde · 3.4K visitas mensuales

Agentary es un SDK de JavaScript de código abierto para que los desarrolladores construyan y ejecuten agentes de IA autónomos directamente en el navegador. Aprovecha WebGPU y WebAssembly para la ejecución en el dispositivo, garantizando total privacidad de datos, latencia cero y funcionalidad sin conexión. Este marco sin servidor permite la creación de aplicaciones web rápidas, privadas e inteligentes sin dependencias de la nube ni costos de API.

Visitar sitioVer detalles
VS
Screenpipe
Datos Personales · 49.4K visitas mensuales

Screenpipe es un SDK de IA de código abierto que captura la pantalla y el audio de tu ordenador 24/7, creando una memoria digital local y privada. Impulsa un rico ecosistema de agentes de IA que pueden buscar, resumir y automatizar tareas basándose en tu contexto digital completo, convirtiendo el uso de tu ordenador en una IA potente y personalizada.

Visitar sitioVer detalles

Agentary vs Screenpipe: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Agentary y Screenpipe por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Agentary Resumen del producto

Agentary es un SDK de JavaScript de código abierto para que los desarrolladores construyan y ejecuten agentes de IA autónomos directamente en el navegador. Aprovecha WebGPU y WebAssembly para la ejecución en el dispositivo, garantizando total privacidad de datos, latencia cero y funcionalidad sin conexión. Este marco sin servidor permite la creación de aplicaciones web rápidas, privadas e inteligentes sin dependencias de la nube ni costos de API.

Preview

Screenpipe Resumen del producto

Screenpipe es un SDK de IA de código abierto que captura la pantalla y el audio de tu ordenador 24/7, creando una memoria digital local y privada. Impulsa un rico ecosistema de agentes de IA que pueden buscar, resumir y automatizar tareas basándose en tu contexto digital completo, convirtiendo el uso de tu ordenador en una IA potente y personalizada.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureAgentaryScreenpipe
Categoría principalComputación en el BordeDatos Personales
Añadido2025-11-062025-09-11
PrecioGratisFreemium
Sitio oficialwww.agentary.aiscreenpi.pe
Tipo de productoSitio webAplicación
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales3.4K49.4K
Crecimiento mensualSin verificar-12.6%
Favoritos10476
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

Agentary vs Screenpipe monthly traffic

Compare Agentary and Screenpipe by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Agentary vs Screenpipe monthly traffic comparison, Agentary currently shows 3.4K visits and Screenpipe shows 49.4K; Screenpipe has about 14.6 times the visible traffic of Agentary, an absolute difference of about 46K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Screenpipe has complete third-party traffic details; Agentary uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Agentary monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
3.4K

Screenpipe monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
49.4K
Duración media
0:35
Páginas por visita
1.95
Tasa de rebote
42.34%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 14.3K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 22.1K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 26.8K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 42.6K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 56.4K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 49.4K Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States54.22%26.8K
🇮🇳India17.53%8.7K
🇷🇺Russia10.04%5K
🇩🇪Germany9.54%4.7K
🇹🇼Taiwan8.67%4.3K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo81.67%40.3K
Referido12.34%6.1K
Correo electrónico5.99%3K

Palabras clave

screenpi $200screen pipescreenpipescreenpipe alternativescreenpipe download
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Agentary and Screenpipe

Agentary Core features

SDK
Computación en el Borde
Javascript

Screenpipe Core features

SDK
Datos Personales
Mejora de Escritorio
Automatización

Use cases

Agentary Use cases

IA local
Código Abierto
Privacidad
Agente de IA
IA basada en navegador
Computación en el borde
JavaScript
IA sin conexión
SDK
Serverless
WebGPU

Screenpipe Use cases

IA local
Código Abierto
Privacidad
Agentes de IA
SDK de IA
Transcripción de audio
automatización
Capa de contexto
IA de escritorio
gestión del conocimiento
IA Personal
productividad
Grabación de pantalla

Best suited roles

Agentary Best suited roles

Desarrollador de Software

Screenpipe Best suited roles

Desarrollador de Software
Investigador de IA
Creador de contenido
Analista de Datos
Fundador
Trabajador del Conocimiento
Investigador de mercado
Entusiasta de la Productividad
Gerente de Producto

Agentary vs Screenpipe：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Agentary vs Screenpipe comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Agentary is primarily listed under “Computación en el Borde”, while Screenpipe is primarily listed under “Datos Personales”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Agentary: Computación en el Borde; Screenpipe: Datos Personales); Product type (Agentary: Website; Screenpipe: App); Pricing (Agentary: Free; Screenpipe: Freemium); Monthly visits (Agentary: 3.4K; Screenpipe: 49.4K); Favorites (Agentary: 104; Screenpipe: 76). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Agentary vs Screenpipe monthly traffic comparison, Agentary currently shows 3.4K visits and Screenpipe shows 49.4K; Screenpipe has about 14.6 times the visible traffic of Agentary, an absolute difference of about 46K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Screenpipe has complete third-party traffic details; Agentary uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Agentary and Screenpipe currently overlap in shared categories: SDK; shared tags: IA local, Código Abierto y Privacidad; shared roles: Desarrollador de Software. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Agentary's unique categories/tags are Computación en el Borde, Javascript, Agente de IA, IA basada en navegador, Computación en el borde, JavaScript, IA sin conexión y SDK; Screenpipe's are Datos Personales, Mejora de Escritorio, Automatización, Agentes de IA, SDK de IA, Transcripción de audio, automatización y Capa de contexto. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Agentary has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 114 likes；Screenpipe has no verified rating, 0 comments, 76 favorites, and 92 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Agentary first

Put Agentary on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Computación en el Borde” and especially Computación en el Borde, Javascript, Agente de IA, IA basada en navegador, Computación en el borde y JavaScript. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Agentary also currently records: pricing is free, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Screenpipe first

Put Screenpipe on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Datos Personales” and especially Datos Personales, Mejora de Escritorio, Automatización, Agentes de IA, SDK de IA y Transcripción de audio, or the users include Investigador de IA, Creador de contenido, Analista de Datos y Fundador. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Screenpipe also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 49.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Agentary and Screenpipe, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Agentary and Screenpipe?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.

Herramientas patrocinadas

Discover more tools in the same category.

Jyek
AD

Jyek

Jyek es una plataforma de agente de IA que comprende objetivos, crea planes de ejecución, utiliza herramientas y entrega resultados verificables para tareas complejas de múltiples pasos.

Automatización
Visits 1.8KFavorites 1Likes 1