ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
DingTalk
Gestión · 19.2M visitas mensuales

DingTalk es una plataforma todo en uno de colaboración y gestión empresarial impulsada por IA. Integra mensajería instantánea, videoconferencias, gestión de proyectos y una suite ofimática completa con capacidades avanzadas de IA como asistentes inteligentes, resúmenes de reuniones automatizados y análisis de datos con IA. Diseñada para empresas de todos los tamaños, agiliza los flujos de trabajo, mejora la productividad y digitaliza las operaciones organizativas, desde RR.HH. hasta finanzas.

Visitar sitioVer detalles
VS
eboard
Gestión · 1.3K visitas mensuales

eBoard es una plataforma de gestión de juntas segura y todo en uno, diseñada para agilizar las operaciones, mejorar la gobernanza e impulsar la participación de las juntas en diversos sectores. Centraliza la comunicación, los documentos y los flujos de trabajo de las reuniones en una única solución intuitiva basada en la nube.

Visitar sitioVer detalles

DingTalk vs eboard: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara DingTalk y eboard por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

DingTalk Resumen del producto

DingTalk es una plataforma todo en uno de colaboración y gestión empresarial impulsada por IA. Integra mensajería instantánea, videoconferencias, gestión de proyectos y una suite ofimática completa con capacidades avanzadas de IA como asistentes inteligentes, resúmenes de reuniones automatizados y análisis de datos con IA. Diseñada para empresas de todos los tamaños, agiliza los flujos de trabajo, mejora la productividad y digitaliza las operaciones organizativas, desde RR.HH. hasta finanzas.

Preview

eboard Resumen del producto

eBoard es una plataforma de gestión de juntas segura y todo en uno, diseñada para agilizar las operaciones, mejorar la gobernanza e impulsar la participación de las juntas en diversos sectores. Centraliza la comunicación, los documentos y los flujos de trabajo de las reuniones en una única solución intuitiva basada en la nube.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureDingTalkeboard
Categoría principalGestiónGestión
Añadido2025-08-102025-08-14
PrecioFreemiumDe pago
Sitio oficialwww.dingtalk.comeboard.cloud
Tipo de productoAplicaciónSitio web
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales19.2M1.3K
Crecimiento mensual-2.1%171.2%
Favoritos104118
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic

Compare DingTalk and eboard by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

DingTalk monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
19.2M
Duración media
7:44
Páginas por visita
5.02
Tasa de rebote
33.01%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 19.7M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 19.1M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 13.1M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 22.6M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 19.6M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 19.2M Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇨🇳China94.5%18.2M
🇺🇸United States2.35%451.4K
🇭🇰Hong Kong1.68%322.7K
🇸🇬Singapore0.91%174.8K
🇹🇼Taiwan0.56%107.6K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo89.67%17.2M
Referido10.1%1.9M
Correo electrónico0.23%44.2K

Palabras clave

dingding悟空钉钉钉钉文档钉钉网页版

eboard monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
1.3K
Duración media
0:05
Páginas por visita
1.72
Tasa de rebote
36.45%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/7: 690 Visitas mensuales
  • 2025/8: 0 Visitas mensuales
  • 2025/9: 473 Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 0 Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 0 Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 1.3K Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States57.65%740
🇮🇩Indonesia27.52%353
🇰🇷Korea, Republic of14.83%190

Palabras clave

e boarde-boardeboarde-board memberwhat does e baord mean
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of DingTalk and eboard

DingTalk Core features

Gestión
Colaboración
Chat de Equipo

eboard Core features

Gestión
Colaboración
Protección de Datos

Use cases

DingTalk Use cases

Asistente de IA
Alibaba
Comunicación empresarial
Gestión de RRHH
plataforma low-code
Suite de oficina
gestión de proyectos
Colaboración en equipo
Videoconferencia

eboard Use cases

Gestión del Consejo
Portal del Consejo
Colaboración
gobierno corporativo
Toma de decisiones
seguridad de documentos
Gobernanza
Gestión de reuniones
Sin fines de lucro

DingTalk vs eboard：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth DingTalk vs eboard comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. DingTalk is primarily listed under “Gestión”, while eboard is primarily listed under “Gestión”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (DingTalk: App; eboard: Website); Pricing (DingTalk: Freemium; eboard: Paid); Monthly visits (DingTalk: 19.2M; eboard: 1.3K); Monthly growth (DingTalk: -2.1%; eboard: 171.2%); Favorites (DingTalk: 104; eboard: 118). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

DingTalk and eboard currently overlap in shared categories: Gestión y Colaboración. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

DingTalk's unique categories/tags are Chat de Equipo, Asistente de IA, Alibaba, Comunicación empresarial, Gestión de RRHH, plataforma low-code, Suite de oficina y gestión de proyectos; eboard's are Protección de Datos, Gestión del Consejo, Portal del Consejo, Colaboración, gobierno corporativo, Toma de decisiones, seguridad de documentos y Gobernanza. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

DingTalk has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 113 likes；eboard has no verified rating, 0 comments, 118 favorites, and 121 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate DingTalk first

Put DingTalk on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestión” and especially Chat de Equipo, Asistente de IA, Alibaba, Comunicación empresarial, Gestión de RRHH y plataforma low-code. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

DingTalk also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 19.2M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate eboard first

Put eboard on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestión” and especially Protección de Datos, Gestión del Consejo, Portal del Consejo, Colaboración, gobierno corporativo y Toma de decisiones. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

eboard also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in DingTalk and eboard, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between DingTalk and eboard?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.