ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
Fellow.app
Colaboración en Equipo · 194.1K visitas mensuales

Fellow.app es un asistente de reuniones con IA seguro, diseñado para mejorar la productividad en todo el ciclo de vida de las reuniones. Graba, transcribe, resume y asigna acciones automáticamente, permitiendo a los equipos centrarse en la colaboración. Con un fuerte énfasis en la privacidad, Fellow garantiza que tus datos de reunión estén siempre protegidos.

VS
Shadow
Gestión de Tareas · 23.2K visitas mensuales

Shadow es un asistente de reuniones con IA para Mac que transcribe, resume y transforma discusiones en resultados accionables automáticamente. Opera en segundo plano, asegurando que cada reunión se convierta en un activo de conocimiento permanente y buscable, con un fuerte enfoque en la privacidad a través del procesamiento local en el dispositivo.

Fellow.app vs Shadow: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Fellow.app y Shadow por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Fellow.app Resumen del producto

Fellow.app es un asistente de reuniones con IA seguro, diseñado para mejorar la productividad en todo el ciclo de vida de las reuniones. Graba, transcribe, resume y asigna acciones automáticamente, permitiendo a los equipos centrarse en la colaboración. Con un fuerte énfasis en la privacidad, Fellow garantiza que tus datos de reunión estén siempre protegidos.

Preview

Shadow Resumen del producto

Shadow es un asistente de reuniones con IA para Mac que transcribe, resume y transforma discusiones en resultados accionables automáticamente. Opera en segundo plano, asegurando que cada reunión se convierta en un activo de conocimiento permanente y buscable, con un fuerte enfoque en la privacidad a través del procesamiento local en el dispositivo.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureFellow.appShadow
Categoría principalColaboración en EquipoGestión de Tareas
Añadido2025-08-092025-08-12
PrecioFreemiumFreemium
Sitio oficialfellow.appwww.shadow.do
Tipo de productoSitio webAplicación
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales194.1K23.2K
Crecimiento mensual-2.3%54.5%
Favoritos112102
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic

Compare Fellow.app and Shadow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic comparison, Fellow.app currently shows 194.1K visits and Shadow shows 23.2K; Fellow.app has about 8.4 times the visible traffic of Shadow, an absolute difference of about 170.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Fellow.app monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
194.1K
Duración media
2:06
Páginas por visita
3.18
Tasa de rebote
48.62%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 224.9K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 159.9K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 168.9K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 189.5K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 198.6K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 194.1K Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States79.82%154.9K
🇨🇦Canada10.38%20.1K
🇬🇧United Kingdom3.84%7.5K
🇩🇪Germany3.42%6.6K
🇲🇽Mexico2.54%4.9K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo71.92%139.6K
Referido15.12%29.3K
Correo electrónico12.96%25.2K

Palabras clave

fellow note takerthe art of jogging with your boss pdf

Shadow monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
23.2K
Duración media
0:04
Páginas por visita
1.42
Tasa de rebote
39.95%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 17.5K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 22.2K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 16.4K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 20.9K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 15K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 23.2K Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States57.74%13.4K
🇮🇳India13.8%3.2K
🇳🇱Netherlands13.23%3.1K
🇦🇺Australia7.65%1.8K
🇩🇪Germany7.58%1.8K

Palabras clave

granola decrypt local notesshadow aishadow ai notetakershadow appshadow notetaker
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Fellow.app first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Fellow.app and Shadow

Fellow.app Core features

Asistente de Reuniones
Transcripción
Colaboración en Equipo
Anotaciones

Shadow Core features

Asistente de Reuniones
Transcripción
Gestión de Tareas

Use cases

Fellow.app Use cases

Elementos de acción
asistente de reuniones
productividad
Transcripción
Resumen de IA
Automatización de CRM
Gestión de reuniones
Toma de notas
Uno a uno
IA Segura
Colaboración en equipo

Shadow Use cases

Elementos de acción
asistente de reuniones
productividad
Transcripción
Notas de IA
Procesamiento local
App para Mac
Resumen de la reunión
Privacidad
gestión de tareas

Fellow.app vs Shadow:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Fellow.app vs Shadow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fellow.app is primarily listed under “Colaboración en Equipo”, while Shadow is primarily listed under “Gestión de Tareas”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fellow.app: Colaboración en Equipo; Shadow: Gestión de Tareas); Product type (Fellow.app: Website; Shadow: App); Monthly visits (Fellow.app: 194.1K; Shadow: 23.2K); Monthly growth (Fellow.app: -2.3%; Shadow: 54.5%); Favorites (Fellow.app: 112; Shadow: 102). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic comparison, Fellow.app currently shows 194.1K visits and Shadow shows 23.2K; Fellow.app has about 8.4 times the visible traffic of Shadow, an absolute difference of about 170.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Fellow.app first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Fellow.app and Shadow currently overlap in shared categories: Asistente de Reuniones y Transcripción; shared tags: Elementos de acción, asistente de reuniones, productividad y Transcripción. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Fellow.app's unique categories/tags are Colaboración en Equipo, Anotaciones, Resumen de IA, Automatización de CRM, Gestión de reuniones, Toma de notas, Uno a uno e IA Segura; Shadow's are Gestión de Tareas, Notas de IA, Procesamiento local, App para Mac, Resumen de la reunión, Privacidad y gestión de tareas. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Fellow.app has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 120 likes;Shadow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 102 favorites, and 107 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Fellow.app first

Put Fellow.app on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Colaboración en Equipo” and especially Colaboración en Equipo, Anotaciones, Resumen de IA, Automatización de CRM, Gestión de reuniones y Toma de notas. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Fellow.app also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 194.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Shadow first

Put Shadow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestión de Tareas” and especially Gestión de Tareas, Notas de IA, Procesamiento local, App para Mac, Resumen de la reunión y Privacidad. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Shadow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 23.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fellow.app and Shadow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Fellow.app and Shadow?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.