Fellow.app es un asistente de reuniones con IA seguro, diseñado para mejorar la productividad en todo el ciclo de vida de las reuniones. Graba, transcribe, resume y asigna acciones automáticamente, permitiendo a los equipos centrarse en la colaboración. Con un fuerte énfasis en la privacidad, Fellow garantiza que tus datos de reunión estén siempre protegidos.
Shadow es un asistente de reuniones con IA para Mac que transcribe, resume y transforma discusiones en resultados accionables automáticamente. Opera en segundo plano, asegurando que cada reunión se convierta en un activo de conocimiento permanente y buscable, con un fuerte enfoque en la privacidad a través del procesamiento local en el dispositivo.
Resumen del producto
Fellow.app Resumen del producto
Fellow.app es un asistente de reuniones con IA seguro, diseñado para mejorar la productividad en todo el ciclo de vida de las reuniones. Graba, transcribe, resume y asigna acciones automáticamente, permitiendo a los equipos centrarse en la colaboración. Con un fuerte énfasis en la privacidad, Fellow garantiza que tus datos de reunión estén siempre protegidos.
Shadow Resumen del producto
Shadow es un asistente de reuniones con IA para Mac que transcribe, resume y transforma discusiones en resultados accionables automáticamente. Opera en segundo plano, asegurando que cada reunión se convierta en un activo de conocimiento permanente y buscable, con un fuerte enfoque en la privacidad a través del procesamiento local en el dispositivo.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Fellow.app | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Categoría principal | Colaboración en Equipo | Gestión de Tareas |
| Añadido | 2025-08-09 | 2025-08-12 |
| Precio | Freemium | Freemium |
| Sitio oficial | fellow.app | www.shadow.do |
| Tipo de producto | Sitio web | Aplicación |
| Performance data | ||
| Valoración | Sin verificar | Sin verificar |
| Comentarios | 0 | 0 |
| Visitas mensuales | 194.1K | 23.2K |
| Crecimiento mensual | -2.3% | 54.5% |
| Favoritos | 112 | 102 |
| Details | Ver detalles | Ver detalles |
Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic
Compare Fellow.app and Shadow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic comparison, Fellow.app currently shows 194.1K visits and Shadow shows 23.2K; Fellow.app has about 8.4 times the visible traffic of Shadow, an absolute difference of about 170.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Fellow.app monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 224.9K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/1: 159.9K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/2: 168.9K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/3: 189.5K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/4: 198.6K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/5: 194.1K Visitas mensuales
Regiones principales
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 79.82% | 154.9K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 10.38% | 20.1K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 3.84% | 7.5K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 3.42% | 6.6K |
| 🇲🇽Mexico | 2.54% | 4.9K |
Fuentes de tráfico
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Directo | 71.92% | 139.6K |
| Referido | 15.12% | 29.3K |
| Correo electrónico | 12.96% | 25.2K |
Palabras clave
Shadow monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 17.5K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/1: 22.2K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/2: 16.4K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/3: 20.9K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/4: 15K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/5: 23.2K Visitas mensuales
Regiones principales
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 57.74% | 13.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 13.8% | 3.2K |
| 🇳🇱Netherlands | 13.23% | 3.1K |
| 🇦🇺Australia | 7.65% | 1.8K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 7.58% | 1.8K |
Palabras clave
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Fellow.app and Shadow
Fellow.app Core features
Shadow Core features
Use cases
Fellow.app Use cases
Shadow Use cases
Fellow.app vs Shadow:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Fellow.app vs Shadow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fellow.app is primarily listed under “Colaboración en Equipo”, while Shadow is primarily listed under “Gestión de Tareas”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fellow.app: Colaboración en Equipo; Shadow: Gestión de Tareas); Product type (Fellow.app: Website; Shadow: App); Monthly visits (Fellow.app: 194.1K; Shadow: 23.2K); Monthly growth (Fellow.app: -2.3%; Shadow: 54.5%); Favorites (Fellow.app: 112; Shadow: 102). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic comparison, Fellow.app currently shows 194.1K visits and Shadow shows 23.2K; Fellow.app has about 8.4 times the visible traffic of Shadow, an absolute difference of about 170.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Fellow.app first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Fellow.app and Shadow currently overlap in shared categories: Asistente de Reuniones y Transcripción; shared tags: Elementos de acción, asistente de reuniones, productividad y Transcripción. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Fellow.app's unique categories/tags are Colaboración en Equipo, Anotaciones, Resumen de IA, Automatización de CRM, Gestión de reuniones, Toma de notas, Uno a uno e IA Segura; Shadow's are Gestión de Tareas, Notas de IA, Procesamiento local, App para Mac, Resumen de la reunión, Privacidad y gestión de tareas. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Fellow.app has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 120 likes;Shadow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 102 favorites, and 107 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Fellow.app first
Put Fellow.app on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Colaboración en Equipo” and especially Colaboración en Equipo, Anotaciones, Resumen de IA, Automatización de CRM, Gestión de reuniones y Toma de notas. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Fellow.app also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 194.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Shadow first
Put Shadow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestión de Tareas” and especially Gestión de Tareas, Notas de IA, Procesamiento local, App para Mac, Resumen de la reunión y Privacidad. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Shadow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 23.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fellow.app and Shadow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




