Despliegue de Modelo · 210.5K visitas mensuales

Flowise es una plataforma de código abierto y bajo código para construir visualmente agentes y aplicaciones de IA personalizadas. Usando una interfaz de arrastrar y soltar, los desarrolladores y equipos pueden prototipar e implementar rápidamente sistemas complejos, desde chatbots con tecnología RAG hasta flujos de trabajo multiagente. Admite más de 100 LLMs, diversas fuentes de datos y ofrece características de nivel empresarial para una implementación escalable.

Visitar sitio Ver detalles

Langflow

Low-code No-code · 243.6K visitas mensuales

Langflow es una interfaz de usuario (UI) visual de código abierto para construir y desplegar aplicaciones de IA. Cuenta con una interfaz de arrastrar y soltar para encadenar LLMs, agentes y herramientas, permitiendo la creación rápida de prototipos y el despliegue de flujos de trabajo complejos como RAG y sistemas multiagente. Admite amplias integraciones y ofrece opciones tanto autoalojadas como en la nube.

Visitar sitio Ver detalles

Flowise vs Langflow: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Flowise y Langflow por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Flowise Resumen del producto

Preview

Langflow Resumen del producto

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

Feature	Flowise	Langflow
Categoría principal	Despliegue de Modelo	Low-code No-code
Añadido	2025-08-08	2025-08-14
Precio	Freemium	Freemium
Sitio oficial	flowiseai.com	www.langflow.org
Tipo de producto	Sitio web	Sitio web
Performance data
Valoración	Sin verificar	Sin verificar
Comentarios	0	0
Visitas mensuales	210.5K	243.6K
Crecimiento mensual	-5.9%	6.2%
Favoritos	119	69
Details	Ver detalles	Ver detalles

Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic

Compare Flowise and Langflow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic comparison, Flowise currently shows 210.5K visits and Langflow shows 243.6K; Langflow has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Flowise, an absolute difference of about 33.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Flowise monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales

210.5K

Duración media

1:55

Páginas por visita

3.71

Tasa de rebote

40.16%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇮🇳India	34.54%	72.7K
🇺🇸United States	25%	52.6K
🇸🇬Singapore	14.48%	30.5K
🇻🇳Vietnam	14.48%	30.5K
🇩🇪Germany	11.5%	24.2K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Directo	71.85%	151.3K
Referido	27.25%	57.4K
Correo electrónico	0.9%	1.9K

Palabras clave

flowiseflowise aiflowiseaiflowiseai apiflowwise

Langflow monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales

243.6K

Duración media

1:09

Páginas por visita

1.95

Tasa de rebote

44.67%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇨🇳China	42.24%	102.9K
🇮🇳India	18.05%	44K
🇺🇸United States	16.88%	41.1K
🇮🇩Indonesia	16.72%	40.7K
🇬🇧United Kingdom	6.11%	14.9K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Directo	78.32%	190.8K
Referido	20.42%	49.7K
Correo electrónico	1.26%	3.1K

Palabras clave

composiolangflowlangfuseopenrouterpdf to markdown

Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Flowise and Langflow

Flowise Core features

Low-code No-code

Despliegue de Modelo

Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo

Chatbot

Langflow Core features

Low-code No-code

Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo

Use cases

Flowise Use cases

Agente de IA

Herramientas para desarrolladores

low-code

Sistemas multiagente

No-code

Código Abierto

Generación Aumentada por Recuperación

Constructor visual

automatización de flujo de trabajo

Creador de chatbot

LangChain

Langflow Use cases

Agente de IA

Herramientas para desarrolladores

low-code

Sistemas multiagente

No-code

Código Abierto

Generación Aumentada por Recuperación

Constructor visual

automatización de flujo de trabajo

API

Modelo de Lenguaje de Gran Escala

Flowise vs Langflow：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Flowise vs Langflow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Flowise is primarily listed under “Despliegue de Modelo”, while Langflow is primarily listed under “Low-code No-code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Flowise: Despliegue de Modelo; Langflow: Low-code No-code); Monthly visits (Flowise: 210.5K; Langflow: 243.6K); Monthly growth (Flowise: -5.9%; Langflow: 6.2%); Favorites (Flowise: 119; Langflow: 69); Website (Flowise: flowiseai.com; Langflow: www.langflow.org). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Flowise and Langflow currently overlap in shared categories: Low-code No-code; shared tags: Agente de IA, Herramientas para desarrolladores, low-code, Sistemas multiagente, No-code, Código Abierto, Generación Aumentada por Recuperación, Constructor visual y automatización de flujo de trabajo. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Flowise's unique categories/tags are Despliegue de Modelo, Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, Chatbot, Creador de chatbot y LangChain; Langflow's are Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, API y Modelo de Lenguaje de Gran Escala. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Flowise has no verified rating, 0 comments, 119 favorites, and 134 likes；Langflow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 69 favorites, and 77 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Flowise first

Put Flowise on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Despliegue de Modelo” and especially Despliegue de Modelo, Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, Chatbot, Creador de chatbot y LangChain. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Flowise also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 210.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Langflow first

Put Langflow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Low-code No-code” and especially Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, API y Modelo de Lenguaje de Gran Escala. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Langflow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 243.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Flowise and Langflow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Flowise and Langflow?

Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.

Where does this comparison data come from?

The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.

What do unknown fields mean?

Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.