ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
Rivet
Backend · 3.4K visitas mensuales

Rivet es una biblioteca de código abierto para desarrolladores que construyen aplicaciones escalables y en tiempo real con estado duradero. Proporciona "actores" de computación con estado y de larga duración que simplifican tareas complejas como la creación de agentes de IA, aplicaciones colaborativas y juegos multijugador. Con características como comunicación en tiempo real integrada, tolerancia a fallos y despliegue en el borde, Rivet ofrece una alternativa potente y autohospedable a servicios como los Durable Objects de Cloudflare.

VS
Supabase
Backend · 29.3M visitas mensuales

Supabase es una alternativa de código abierto a Firebase, que proporciona una solución de backend completa construida sobre Postgres. Ofrece un conjunto de herramientas que incluye base de datos, autenticación, APIs instantáneas, edge functions, suscripciones en tiempo real, almacenamiento y embeddings vectoriales para acelerar el desarrollo de aplicaciones desde el prototipo hasta la producción.

Rivet vs Supabase: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Rivet y Supabase por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Rivet Resumen del producto

Rivet es una biblioteca de código abierto para desarrolladores que construyen aplicaciones escalables y en tiempo real con estado duradero. Proporciona "actores" de computación con estado y de larga duración que simplifican tareas complejas como la creación de agentes de IA, aplicaciones colaborativas y juegos multijugador. Con características como comunicación en tiempo real integrada, tolerancia a fallos y despliegue en el borde, Rivet ofrece una alternativa potente y autohospedable a servicios como los Durable Objects de Cloudflare.

Preview

Supabase Resumen del producto

Supabase es una alternativa de código abierto a Firebase, que proporciona una solución de backend completa construida sobre Postgres. Ofrece un conjunto de herramientas que incluye base de datos, autenticación, APIs instantáneas, edge functions, suscripciones en tiempo real, almacenamiento y embeddings vectoriales para acelerar el desarrollo de aplicaciones desde el prototipo hasta la producción.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureRivetSupabase
Categoría principalBackendBackend
Añadido2025-08-042025-08-10
PrecioFreemiumFreemium
Sitio oficialwww.rivet.ggsupabase.com
Tipo de productoSitio webSitio web
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales3.4K29.3M
Crecimiento mensualSin verificar11.7%
Favoritos100125
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

Rivet vs Supabase monthly traffic

Compare Rivet and Supabase by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Rivet vs Supabase monthly traffic comparison, Rivet currently shows 3.4K visits and Supabase shows 29.3M; Supabase has about 8,613.9 times the visible traffic of Rivet, an absolute difference of about 29.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Supabase has complete third-party traffic details; Rivet uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Rivet monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
3.4K

Supabase monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
29.3M
Duración media
9:51
Páginas por visita
10.22
Tasa de rebote
25.08%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 13.8M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 18.6M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 20.1M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 25.3M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 26.2M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 29.3M Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States47.42%13.9M
🇮🇳India23%6.7M
🇧🇷Brazil13.44%3.9M
🇬🇧United Kingdom8.16%2.4M
🇵🇰Pakistan7.98%2.3M

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo94.28%27.6M
Referido3.43%1M
Correo electrónico2.29%669.9K

Palabras clave

supa basesupabasesupabase loginsupabase pricingsuperbase
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Rivet and Supabase

Rivet Core features

Backend
Bibliotecas y Frameworks
Serverless
Colaboración

Supabase Core features

Backend
Base de datos
Plataforma como Servicio
No-code y Low-code

Use cases

Rivet Use cases

Herramientas para desarrolladores
Código Abierto
Serverless
Agente de IA
Backend
Objetos duraderos
Node.js
Tiempo real
Con estado
TypeScript
WebSocket

Supabase Use cases

Herramientas para desarrolladores
Código Abierto
Serverless
IA
autenticación
BaaS
Backend como servicio
base de datos
Alternativa a Firebase
Postgres
Base de datos vectorial

Rivet vs Supabase:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Rivet vs Supabase comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Rivet is primarily listed under “Backend”, while Supabase is primarily listed under “Backend”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (Rivet: 3.4K; Supabase: 29.3M); Favorites (Rivet: 100; Supabase: 125); Website (Rivet: www.rivet.gg; Supabase: supabase.com); Added (Rivet: 2025-08-04; Supabase: 2025-08-10). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Rivet vs Supabase monthly traffic comparison, Rivet currently shows 3.4K visits and Supabase shows 29.3M; Supabase has about 8,613.9 times the visible traffic of Rivet, an absolute difference of about 29.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Supabase has complete third-party traffic details; Rivet uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Rivet and Supabase currently overlap in shared categories: Backend; shared tags: Herramientas para desarrolladores, Código Abierto y Serverless. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Rivet's unique categories/tags are Bibliotecas y Frameworks, Serverless, Colaboración, Agente de IA, Backend, Objetos duraderos, Node.js y Tiempo real; Supabase's are Base de datos, Plataforma como Servicio, No-code y Low-code, IA, autenticación, BaaS, Backend como servicio y base de datos. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Rivet has no verified rating, 0 comments, 100 favorites, and 110 likes;Supabase has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 136 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Rivet first

Put Rivet on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Backend” and especially Bibliotecas y Frameworks, Serverless, Colaboración, Agente de IA, Backend y Objetos duraderos. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Rivet also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Supabase first

Put Supabase on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Backend” and especially Base de datos, Plataforma como Servicio, No-code y Low-code, IA, autenticación y BaaS. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Supabase also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 29.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Rivet and Supabase, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Rivet and Supabase?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.

Herramientas patrocinadas

Discover more tools in the same category.

Jyek
AD

Jyek

Jyek es una plataforma de agente de IA que comprende objetivos, crea planes de ejecución, utiliza herramientas y entrega resultados verificables para tareas complejas de múltiples pasos.

Automatización
Visits 1.8KFavorites 1Likes 1