ToolMage
Connexion
Atlassian
Collaboration · 35.1M visites mensuelles

Atlassian fournit une suite intégrée d'outils de collaboration, de développement et de suivi des problèmes pour les équipes de toutes tailles. Propulsés par Atlassian Intelligence, des produits comme Jira, Confluence et Trello aident les équipes logicielles, informatiques et commerciales à planifier, suivre et livrer le travail plus efficacement. C'est une plateforme complète conçue pour libérer le potentiel de chaque équipe grâce à une intégration transparente et une productivité pilotée par l'IA.

Visiter le siteVoir les détails
VS
TaskHuddle
Collecte de commentaires · 3.4K visites mensuelles

TaskHuddle est un outil de feedback visuel et de suivi des bogues, principalement pour WordPress, qui permet aux clients et aux membres de l'équipe de fournir des commentaires contextuels directement sur votre site web ou votre application web. Il rationalise le processus de révision en convertissant les clics et les commentaires en tâches exploitables dans un tableau de bord centralisé.

Visiter le siteVoir les détails

Atlassian vs TaskHuddle : prix, fonctions et trafic

Comparez Atlassian et TaskHuddle selon leur positionnement, prix, fonctions, trafic et avis.

Mis à jour 5 août 2026

Aperçu du produit

Atlassian Aperçu du produit

Atlassian fournit une suite intégrée d'outils de collaboration, de développement et de suivi des problèmes pour les équipes de toutes tailles. Propulsés par Atlassian Intelligence, des produits comme Jira, Confluence et Trello aident les équipes logicielles, informatiques et commerciales à planifier, suivre et livrer le travail plus efficacement. C'est une plateforme complète conçue pour libérer le potentiel de chaque équipe grâce à une intégration transparente et une productivité pilotée par l'IA.

Preview

TaskHuddle Aperçu du produit

TaskHuddle est un outil de feedback visuel et de suivi des bogues, principalement pour WordPress, qui permet aux clients et aux membres de l'équipe de fournir des commentaires contextuels directement sur votre site web ou votre application web. Il rationalise le processus de révision en convertissant les clics et les commentaires en tâches exploitables dans un tableau de bord centralisé.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureAtlassianTaskHuddle
Catégorie principaleCollaborationCollecte de commentaires
Ajouté2025-08-122025-08-08
TarificationFreemiumPayant
Site officielwww.atlassian.comtaskhuddle.com
Type de produitSite webSite web
Performance data
Note utilisateurNon vérifiéNon vérifié
Commentaires00
Visites mensuelles35.1M3.4K
Croissance mensuelle-3.8%Non vérifié
Favoris140112
DetailsVoir les détailsVoir les détails

Atlassian vs TaskHuddle monthly traffic

Compare Atlassian and TaskHuddle by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Atlassian vs TaskHuddle monthly traffic comparison, Atlassian currently shows 35.1M visits and TaskHuddle shows 3.4K; Atlassian has about 10,446.6 times the visible traffic of TaskHuddle, an absolute difference of about 35.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Atlassian has complete third-party traffic details; TaskHuddle uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Atlassian monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
35.1M
Durée moyenne
2:24
Pages par visite
4.87
Taux de rebond
31.45%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 33.4M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/1: 33.6M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/2: 33.1M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/3: 38.5M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/4: 36.5M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/5: 35.1M Visites mensuelles

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States51.49%18.1M
🇮🇳India18.75%6.6M
🇧🇷Brazil12.85%4.5M
🇩🇪Germany8.64%3M
🇬🇧United Kingdom8.27%2.9M

Sources de trafic

Source typePercentageTraffic
Référence64.32%22.6M
Direct29.64%10.4M
E-mail6.04%2.1M

Mots-clés

atlassianconfluencejirajira loginloom

TaskHuddle monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
3.4K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Atlassian and TaskHuddle

Atlassian Core features

Gestion de projet
Collaboration
Plateformes de Développement
Centre de services

TaskHuddle Core features

Gestion de projet
Collecte de commentaires
Suivi des bugs

Use cases

Atlassian Use cases

Suivi des bugs
Collaboration
gestion de projet
Agile
Atlassian Intelligence
DevOps
ITSM
Base de connaissances
Développement de logiciels
Travail d'équipe

TaskHuddle Use cases

Suivi des bugs
Collaboration
gestion de projet
retour client
Outils pour développeurs
Retour visuel
Conception web
Annotation de site web
Plugin WordPress

Atlassian vs TaskHuddle：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Atlassian vs TaskHuddle comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Atlassian is primarily listed under “Collaboration”, while TaskHuddle is primarily listed under “Collecte de commentaires”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Atlassian: Collaboration; TaskHuddle: Collecte de commentaires); Pricing (Atlassian: Freemium; TaskHuddle: Paid); Monthly visits (Atlassian: 35.1M; TaskHuddle: 3.4K); Favorites (Atlassian: 140; TaskHuddle: 112); Website (Atlassian: www.atlassian.com; TaskHuddle: taskhuddle.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Atlassian vs TaskHuddle monthly traffic comparison, Atlassian currently shows 35.1M visits and TaskHuddle shows 3.4K; Atlassian has about 10,446.6 times the visible traffic of TaskHuddle, an absolute difference of about 35.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Atlassian has complete third-party traffic details; TaskHuddle uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Atlassian and TaskHuddle currently overlap in shared categories: Gestion de projet; shared tags: Suivi des bugs, Collaboration et gestion de projet. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Atlassian's unique categories/tags are Collaboration, Plateformes de Développement, Centre de services, Agile, Atlassian Intelligence, DevOps, ITSM et Base de connaissances; TaskHuddle's are Collecte de commentaires, Suivi des bugs, retour client, Outils pour développeurs, Retour visuel, Conception web, Annotation de site web et Plugin WordPress. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Atlassian has no verified rating, 0 comments, 140 favorites, and 133 likes；TaskHuddle has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 115 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Atlassian first

Put Atlassian on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Collaboration” and especially Collaboration, Plateformes de Développement, Centre de services, Agile, Atlassian Intelligence et DevOps. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Atlassian also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 35.1M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate TaskHuddle first

Put TaskHuddle on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Collecte de commentaires” and especially Collecte de commentaires, Suivi des bugs, retour client, Outils pour développeurs, Retour visuel et Conception web. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

TaskHuddle also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Atlassian and TaskHuddle, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ comparative

How should I choose between Atlassian and TaskHuddle?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.