GhostSnap est un outil de productivité macOS qui révolutionne le flux de travail des captures d'écran. Il permet de capturer plusieurs images, de les compresser automatiquement jusqu'à 80% pour économiser de l'espace et réduire la consommation de jetons dans les outils IA, et de tout coller en une seule commande. Il comprend également une extraction de texte OCR locale et des outils d'annotation d'images.
Screenity est un enregistreur d'écran et de caméra pour Chrome, puissant, gratuit et axé sur la confidentialité. Il offre un enregistrement illimité, des outils d'annotation et un montage vidéo de base sans collecter aucune donnée utilisateur. Idéal pour créer des tutoriels, des démos et des présentations.
GhostSnap est un outil de productivité macOS qui révolutionne le flux de travail des captures d'écran. Il permet de capturer plusieurs images, de les compresser automatiquement jusqu'à 80% pour économiser de l'espace et réduire la consommation de jetons dans les outils IA, et de tout coller en une seule commande. Il comprend également une extraction de texte OCR locale et des outils d'annotation d'images.
Screenity est un enregistreur d'écran et de caméra pour Chrome, puissant, gratuit et axé sur la confidentialité. Il offre un enregistrement illimité, des outils d'annotation et un montage vidéo de base sans collecter aucune donnée utilisateur. Idéal pour créer des tutoriels, des démos et des présentations.
| Feature | GhostSnap | Screenity |
|---|---|---|
| Catégorie principale | Image Tools | Signalement de bogues |
| Ajouté | 2026-05-22 | 2025-09-10 |
| Tarification | Payant | Gratuit |
| Site officiel | ghostsnap.app | screenity.io |
| Type de produit | Application | Extension de navigateur |
| Performance data | ||
| Note utilisateur | Non vérifié | Non vérifié |
| Commentaires | 0 | 0 |
| Visites mensuelles | 3.7K | 43.8K |
| Croissance mensuelle | Non vérifié | -1.6% |
| Favoris | 5 | 111 |
| Details | Voir les détails | Voir les détails |
Compare GhostSnap and Screenity by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the GhostSnap vs Screenity monthly traffic comparison, GhostSnap currently shows 3.7K visits and Screenity shows 43.8K; Screenity has about 12 times the visible traffic of GhostSnap, an absolute difference of about 40.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Screenity has complete third-party traffic details; GhostSnap uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 46.14% | 20.2K |
| 🇮🇳India | 21.26% | 9.3K |
| 🇫🇷France | 12.83% | 5.6K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 10.03% | 4.4K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 9.74% | 4.3K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 81.8% | 35.9K |
| Référence | 18.2% | 8K |
This in-depth GhostSnap vs Screenity comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. GhostSnap is primarily listed under “Image Tools”, while Screenity is primarily listed under “Signalement de bogues”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (GhostSnap: Image Tools; Screenity: Signalement de bogues); Product type (GhostSnap: App; Screenity: Browser extension); Pricing (GhostSnap: Paid; Screenity: Free); Monthly visits (GhostSnap: 3.7K; Screenity: 43.8K); Favorites (GhostSnap: 5; Screenity: 111). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the GhostSnap vs Screenity monthly traffic comparison, GhostSnap currently shows 3.7K visits and Screenity shows 43.8K; Screenity has about 12 times the visible traffic of GhostSnap, an absolute difference of about 40.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Screenity has complete third-party traffic details; GhostSnap uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
GhostSnap and Screenity currently overlap in shared tags: annotation et Capture d'écran; shared roles: Créateur de contenu, Support client, Développeur de logiciels et Designer UI/UX. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
GhostSnap's unique categories/tags are Image Tools, Annotation, OCR, batch, Presse-papiers, compression, macOS et productivité; Screenity's are Signalement de bogues, Création de tutoriels, Création de vidéos, Enregistrement d'écran, Extension Chrome, Outil gratuit, Open source et Confidentialité. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
GhostSnap has no verified rating, 0 comments, 5 favorites, and 2 likes；Screenity has no verified rating, 0 comments, 111 favorites, and 110 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put GhostSnap on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Image Tools” and especially Image Tools, Annotation, OCR, batch, Presse-papiers et compression, or the users include Spécialiste en marketing digital, Graphiste et Chercheur. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
GhostSnap also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is app, 3.7K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Screenity on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Signalement de bogues” and especially Signalement de bogues, Création de tutoriels, Création de vidéos, Enregistrement d'écran, Extension Chrome et Outil gratuit, or the users include éducateur, Responsable Marketing, Chef de Produit et Testeur QA. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Screenity also currently records: pricing is free, product type is browser extension, 43.8K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in GhostSnap and Screenity, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
