Augment Code est une plateforme de développement logiciel IA avancée dotée d'agents autonomes et d'un puissant moteur de contexte. Elle s'intègre à votre IDE pour vous aider à planifier, construire et livrer du code prêt pour la production plus rapidement, avec un accent sur la sécurité de niveau entreprise et une compréhension approfondie de la base de code.
Lingma est un assistant de codage alimenté par l'IA d'Alibaba Cloud, conçu pour améliorer la productivité des développeurs. Il offre la génération de code intelligente, la complétion en temps réel, l'explication de code, le diagnostic d'erreurs et un agent de programmation autonome capable de gérer des tâches de codage complexes sur plusieurs fichiers. Il prend en charge plus de 200 langages et s'intègre de manière transparente avec les principaux IDE.
Augment Code est une plateforme de développement logiciel IA avancée dotée d'agents autonomes et d'un puissant moteur de contexte. Elle s'intègre à votre IDE pour vous aider à planifier, construire et livrer du code prêt pour la production plus rapidement, avec un accent sur la sécurité de niveau entreprise et une compréhension approfondie de la base de code.
Lingma est un assistant de codage alimenté par l'IA d'Alibaba Cloud, conçu pour améliorer la productivité des développeurs. Il offre la génération de code intelligente, la complétion en temps réel, l'explication de code, le diagnostic d'erreurs et un agent de programmation autonome capable de gérer des tâches de codage complexes sur plusieurs fichiers. Il prend en charge plus de 200 langages et s'intègre de manière transparente avec les principaux IDE.
| Feature | Augment Code | Lingma |
|---|---|---|
| Catégorie principale | Génération de code | Programmation |
| Ajouté | 2025-08-05 | 2025-08-07 |
| Tarification | Freemium | Freemium |
| Site officiel | www.augmentcode.com | lingma.aliyun.com |
| Type de produit | Extension de navigateur | Extension de navigateur |
| Performance data | ||
| Note utilisateur | Non vérifié | Non vérifié |
| Commentaires | 0 | 0 |
| Visites mensuelles | 543.5K | 154.2K |
| Croissance mensuelle | 7.2% | -5.1% |
| Favoris | 132 | 141 |
| Details | Voir les détails | Voir les détails |
Compare Augment Code and Lingma by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the Augment Code vs Lingma monthly traffic comparison, Augment Code currently shows 543.5K visits and Lingma shows 154.2K; Augment Code has about 3.5 times the visible traffic of Lingma, an absolute difference of about 389.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 56.75% | 308.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 17.56% | 95.4K |
| 🇨🇳China | 10.67% | 58K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 8.34% | 45.3K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 6.68% | 36.3K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 76.45% | 415.5K |
| Référence | 19.36% | 105.2K |
| 4.19% | 22.8K |
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳China | 94.6% | 145.8K |
| 🇭🇰Hong Kong | 2.39% | 3.7K |
| 🇸🇬Singapore | 1.18% | 1.8K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 1.12% | 1.7K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 0.71% | 1.1K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 56.78% | 87.5K |
| Référence | 43.2% | 66.6K |
| 0.02% | 31 |
This in-depth Augment Code vs Lingma comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Augment Code is primarily listed under “Génération de code”, while Lingma is primarily listed under “Programmation”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Augment Code: Génération de code; Lingma: Programmation); Monthly visits (Augment Code: 543.5K; Lingma: 154.2K); Monthly growth (Augment Code: 7.2%; Lingma: -5.1%); Favorites (Augment Code: 132; Lingma: 141); Website (Augment Code: www.augmentcode.com; Lingma: lingma.aliyun.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the Augment Code vs Lingma monthly traffic comparison, Augment Code currently shows 543.5K visits and Lingma shows 154.2K; Augment Code has about 3.5 times the visible traffic of Lingma, an absolute difference of about 389.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Augment Code first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Augment Code and Lingma currently overlap in shared categories: Assistant de Code et Outils pour les développeurs; shared tags: Programmeur Pair IA, Assistant de code, Génération de code et Extension d'IDE. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Augment Code's unique categories/tags are Génération de code, Agent autonome, Outils pour développeurs, Sécurité d'entreprise, JetBrains, Refactoring, SOC 2 et Développement de logiciels; Lingma's are Programmation, Aliyun, Complétion de code, Débogage, outil de développement, Qwen et tongyi. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
Augment Code has no verified rating, 0 comments, 132 favorites, and 106 likes；Lingma has no verified rating, 0 comments, 141 favorites, and 137 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put Augment Code on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Génération de code” and especially Génération de code, Agent autonome, Outils pour développeurs, Sécurité d'entreprise, JetBrains et Refactoring. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Augment Code also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is browser extension, 543.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Lingma on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Programmation” and especially Programmation, Aliyun, Complétion de code, Débogage, outil de développement et Qwen. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Lingma also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is browser extension, 154.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Augment Code and Lingma, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
