getfloorplan est un service alimenté par l'IA qui transforme de simples téléchargements de plans d'étage (JPG, PNG, PDF) en plans 2D/3D professionnels, en visites virtuelles immersives à 360° et en rendus de haute qualité en 24 heures. Il est conçu pour les professionnels de l'immobilier, les promoteurs et les gestionnaires de biens afin de créer rapidement et à moindre coût des supports marketing percutants, d'améliorer les annonces immobilières et d'accélérer les ventes.
Sphere est une application mobile pour iOS basée sur l'IA qui permet aux agents immobiliers de créer des visites virtuelles 3D immersives de propriétés en utilisant uniquement leur smartphone. Elle élimine le besoin d'équipement coûteux ou de photographes professionnels, offrant une solution rapide et rentable pour améliorer les annonces immobilières, augmenter l'engagement des acheteurs et conclure des ventes plus rapidement.
Aperçu du produit
getfloorplan Aperçu du produit
getfloorplan est un service alimenté par l'IA qui transforme de simples téléchargements de plans d'étage (JPG, PNG, PDF) en plans 2D/3D professionnels, en visites virtuelles immersives à 360° et en rendus de haute qualité en 24 heures. Il est conçu pour les professionnels de l'immobilier, les promoteurs et les gestionnaires de biens afin de créer rapidement et à moindre coût des supports marketing percutants, d'améliorer les annonces immobilières et d'accélérer les ventes.
Sphere Aperçu du produit
Sphere est une application mobile pour iOS basée sur l'IA qui permet aux agents immobiliers de créer des visites virtuelles 3D immersives de propriétés en utilisant uniquement leur smartphone. Elle élimine le besoin d'équipement coûteux ou de photographes professionnels, offrant une solution rapide et rentable pour améliorer les annonces immobilières, augmenter l'engagement des acheteurs et conclure des ventes plus rapidement.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | getfloorplan | Sphere |
|---|---|---|
| Catégorie principale | Modélisation 3D | 3D et RA |
| Ajouté | 2025-08-02 | 2025-08-14 |
| Tarification | Payant | Freemium |
| Site officiel | getfloorplan.com | www.sphere.app |
| Type de produit | Site web | Application |
| Performance data | ||
| Note utilisateur | Non vérifié | Non vérifié |
| Commentaires | 0 | 0 |
| Visites mensuelles | 16.7K | 1.1K |
| Croissance mensuelle | -39.3% | -21.8% |
| Favoris | 115 | 83 |
| Details | Voir les détails | Voir les détails |
getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic
Compare getfloorplan and Sphere by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic comparison, getfloorplan currently shows 16.7K visits and Sphere shows 1.1K; getfloorplan has about 14.7 times the visible traffic of Sphere, an absolute difference of about 15.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
getfloorplan monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 34K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/1: 26.7K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/2: 26.7K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/3: 26K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/4: 27.6K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/5: 16.7K Visites mensuelles
Principales régions
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳India | 25.4% | 4.3K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 23.17% | 3.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 19.46% | 3.3K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 18.35% | 3.1K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 13.62% | 2.3K |
Mots-clés
Sphere monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 410 Visites mensuelles
- 2026/1: 1.5K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/2: 849 Visites mensuelles
- 2026/3: 1.4K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/4: 1.5K Visites mensuelles
- 2026/5: 1.1K Visites mensuelles
Principales régions
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 100% | 1.1K |
Mots-clés
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of getfloorplan and Sphere
getfloorplan Core features
Sphere Core features
Use cases
getfloorplan Use cases
Sphere Use cases
getfloorplan vs Sphere:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth getfloorplan vs Sphere comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. getfloorplan is primarily listed under “Modélisation 3D”, while Sphere is primarily listed under “3D et RA”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (getfloorplan: Modélisation 3D; Sphere: 3D et RA); Product type (getfloorplan: Website; Sphere: App); Pricing (getfloorplan: Paid; Sphere: Freemium); Monthly visits (getfloorplan: 16.7K; Sphere: 1.1K); Monthly growth (getfloorplan: -39.3%; Sphere: -21.8%). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic comparison, getfloorplan currently shows 16.7K visits and Sphere shows 1.1K; getfloorplan has about 14.7 times the visible traffic of Sphere, an absolute difference of about 15.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate getfloorplan first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
getfloorplan and Sphere currently overlap in shared categories: Visite Virtuelle; shared tags: technologie immobilière et visite virtuelle. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
getfloorplan's unique categories/tags are Modélisation 3D, Annonces Immobilières, Plan d'étage 3D, Rendu IA, Visualisation architecturale, Générateur de plans d'étage, design d'intérieur et Proptech; Sphere's are 3D et RA, Application Mobile, Montage Vidéo, visite virtuelle à 360°, Visite 3D, IA, app iOS et application mobile. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
getfloorplan has no verified rating, 0 comments, 115 favorites, and 115 likes;Sphere has no verified rating, 0 comments, 83 favorites, and 83 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate getfloorplan first
Put getfloorplan on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Modélisation 3D” and especially Modélisation 3D, Annonces Immobilières, Plan d'étage 3D, Rendu IA, Visualisation architecturale et Générateur de plans d'étage. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
getfloorplan also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 16.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Sphere first
Put Sphere on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D et RA” and especially 3D et RA, Application Mobile, Montage Vidéo, visite virtuelle à 360°, Visite 3D et IA. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Sphere also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 1.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in getfloorplan and Sphere, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




