ToolMage
Connexion
getfloorplan
Modélisation 3D · 16.7K visites mensuelles

getfloorplan est un service alimenté par l'IA qui transforme de simples téléchargements de plans d'étage (JPG, PNG, PDF) en plans 2D/3D professionnels, en visites virtuelles immersives à 360° et en rendus de haute qualité en 24 heures. Il est conçu pour les professionnels de l'immobilier, les promoteurs et les gestionnaires de biens afin de créer rapidement et à moindre coût des supports marketing percutants, d'améliorer les annonces immobilières et d'accélérer les ventes.

VS
Sphere
3D et RA · 1.1K visites mensuelles

Sphere est une application mobile pour iOS basée sur l'IA qui permet aux agents immobiliers de créer des visites virtuelles 3D immersives de propriétés en utilisant uniquement leur smartphone. Elle élimine le besoin d'équipement coûteux ou de photographes professionnels, offrant une solution rapide et rentable pour améliorer les annonces immobilières, augmenter l'engagement des acheteurs et conclure des ventes plus rapidement.

getfloorplan vs Sphere : prix, fonctions et trafic

Comparez getfloorplan et Sphere selon leur positionnement, prix, fonctions, trafic et avis.

Mis à jour 5 août 2026

Aperçu du produit

getfloorplan Aperçu du produit

getfloorplan est un service alimenté par l'IA qui transforme de simples téléchargements de plans d'étage (JPG, PNG, PDF) en plans 2D/3D professionnels, en visites virtuelles immersives à 360° et en rendus de haute qualité en 24 heures. Il est conçu pour les professionnels de l'immobilier, les promoteurs et les gestionnaires de biens afin de créer rapidement et à moindre coût des supports marketing percutants, d'améliorer les annonces immobilières et d'accélérer les ventes.

Preview

Sphere Aperçu du produit

Sphere est une application mobile pour iOS basée sur l'IA qui permet aux agents immobiliers de créer des visites virtuelles 3D immersives de propriétés en utilisant uniquement leur smartphone. Elle élimine le besoin d'équipement coûteux ou de photographes professionnels, offrant une solution rapide et rentable pour améliorer les annonces immobilières, augmenter l'engagement des acheteurs et conclure des ventes plus rapidement.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeaturegetfloorplanSphere
Catégorie principaleModélisation 3D3D et RA
Ajouté2025-08-022025-08-14
TarificationPayantFreemium
Site officielgetfloorplan.comwww.sphere.app
Type de produitSite webApplication
Performance data
Note utilisateurNon vérifiéNon vérifié
Commentaires00
Visites mensuelles16.7K1.1K
Croissance mensuelle-39.3%-21.8%
Favoris11583
DetailsVoir les détailsVoir les détails

getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic

Compare getfloorplan and Sphere by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic comparison, getfloorplan currently shows 16.7K visits and Sphere shows 1.1K; getfloorplan has about 14.7 times the visible traffic of Sphere, an absolute difference of about 15.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

getfloorplan monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
16.7K
Durée moyenne
0:06
Pages par visite
1.69
Taux de rebond
40.3%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 34K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/1: 26.7K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/2: 26.7K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/3: 26K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/4: 27.6K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/5: 16.7K Visites mensuelles

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇮🇳India25.4%4.3K
🇺🇸United States23.17%3.9K
🇧🇷Brazil19.46%3.3K
🇳🇬Nigeria18.35%3.1K
🇩🇪Germany13.62%2.3K

Mots-clés

ai floor plan app indiabest ai model to show plans in real lifeconvert house plans to 3d online freegetfloorplanhow can we upload a plan to ai models

Sphere monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
1.1K
Durée moyenne
0:39
Pages par visite
1.72
Taux de rebond
36.35%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 410 Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/1: 1.5K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/2: 849 Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/3: 1.4K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/4: 1.5K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/5: 1.1K Visites mensuelles

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States100%1.1K

Mots-clés

3d realtor simulationrealtor cost to do one tourspheresphere 3duse your phone walk thru to do a 3d mock up of real estate
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate getfloorplan first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of getfloorplan and Sphere

getfloorplan Core features

Visite Virtuelle
Modélisation 3D
Annonces Immobilières

Sphere Core features

Visite Virtuelle
3D et RA
Application Mobile
Montage Vidéo

Use cases

getfloorplan Use cases

technologie immobilière
visite virtuelle
Plan d'étage 3D
Rendu IA
Visualisation architecturale
Générateur de plans d'étage
design d'intérieur
Proptech
marketing immobilier

Sphere Use cases

technologie immobilière
visite virtuelle
visite virtuelle à 360°
Visite 3D
IA
app iOS
application mobile
Marketing immobilier
Immobilier
agent immobilier

getfloorplan vs Sphere:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth getfloorplan vs Sphere comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. getfloorplan is primarily listed under “Modélisation 3D”, while Sphere is primarily listed under “3D et RA”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (getfloorplan: Modélisation 3D; Sphere: 3D et RA); Product type (getfloorplan: Website; Sphere: App); Pricing (getfloorplan: Paid; Sphere: Freemium); Monthly visits (getfloorplan: 16.7K; Sphere: 1.1K); Monthly growth (getfloorplan: -39.3%; Sphere: -21.8%). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic comparison, getfloorplan currently shows 16.7K visits and Sphere shows 1.1K; getfloorplan has about 14.7 times the visible traffic of Sphere, an absolute difference of about 15.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate getfloorplan first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

getfloorplan and Sphere currently overlap in shared categories: Visite Virtuelle; shared tags: technologie immobilière et visite virtuelle. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

getfloorplan's unique categories/tags are Modélisation 3D, Annonces Immobilières, Plan d'étage 3D, Rendu IA, Visualisation architecturale, Générateur de plans d'étage, design d'intérieur et Proptech; Sphere's are 3D et RA, Application Mobile, Montage Vidéo, visite virtuelle à 360°, Visite 3D, IA, app iOS et application mobile. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

getfloorplan has no verified rating, 0 comments, 115 favorites, and 115 likes;Sphere has no verified rating, 0 comments, 83 favorites, and 83 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate getfloorplan first

Put getfloorplan on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Modélisation 3D” and especially Modélisation 3D, Annonces Immobilières, Plan d'étage 3D, Rendu IA, Visualisation architecturale et Générateur de plans d'étage. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

getfloorplan also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 16.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Sphere first

Put Sphere on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D et RA” and especially 3D et RA, Application Mobile, Montage Vidéo, visite virtuelle à 360°, Visite 3D et IA. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Sphere also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 1.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in getfloorplan and Sphere, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ comparative

How should I choose between getfloorplan and Sphere?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.