Supabase est une alternative open-source à Firebase, fournissant une solution backend complète basée sur Postgres. Elle offre une suite d'outils comprenant une base de données, l'authentification, des API instantanées, des fonctions edge, des abonnements en temps réel, du stockage et des embeddings vectoriels pour accélérer le développement d'applications, du prototype à la production.
Trigger.dev est une plateforme open source permettant aux développeurs de créer, d'exécuter et de gérer des tâches de fond de longue durée et des workflows d'IA. Elle fournit une infrastructure robuste qui gère les délais d'attente, les nouvelles tentatives et la mise à l'échelle, vous permettant d'écrire des tâches résilientes directement dans votre base de code TypeScript ou Python. Idéal pour orchestrer des agents d'IA complexes, des pipelines de traitement de données et des applications en temps réel sans gérer de serveurs.
Supabase est une alternative open-source à Firebase, fournissant une solution backend complète basée sur Postgres. Elle offre une suite d'outils comprenant une base de données, l'authentification, des API instantanées, des fonctions edge, des abonnements en temps réel, du stockage et des embeddings vectoriels pour accélérer le développement d'applications, du prototype à la production.
Trigger.dev est une plateforme open source permettant aux développeurs de créer, d'exécuter et de gérer des tâches de fond de longue durée et des workflows d'IA. Elle fournit une infrastructure robuste qui gère les délais d'attente, les nouvelles tentatives et la mise à l'échelle, vous permettant d'écrire des tâches résilientes directement dans votre base de code TypeScript ou Python. Idéal pour orchestrer des agents d'IA complexes, des pipelines de traitement de données et des applications en temps réel sans gérer de serveurs.
| Feature | Supabase | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Catégorie principale | Backend | Orchestration de modèles |
| Ajouté | 2025-08-10 | 2025-08-16 |
| Tarification | Freemium | Freemium |
| Site officiel | supabase.com | trigger.dev |
| Type de produit | Site web | Site web |
| Performance data | ||
| Note utilisateur | Non vérifié | Non vérifié |
| Commentaires | 0 | 0 |
| Visites mensuelles | 29.3M | 248.6K |
| Croissance mensuelle | 11.7% | -25.7% |
| Favoris | 125 | 85 |
| Details | Voir les détails | Voir les détails |
Compare Supabase and Trigger.dev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the Supabase vs Trigger.dev monthly traffic comparison, Supabase currently shows 29.3M visits and Trigger.dev shows 248.6K; Supabase has about 117.7 times the visible traffic of Trigger.dev, an absolute difference of about 29M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 47.42% | 13.9M |
| 🇮🇳India | 23% | 6.7M |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 13.44% | 3.9M |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 8.16% | 2.4M |
| 🇵🇰Pakistan | 7.98% | 2.3M |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 94.28% | 27.6M |
| Référence | 3.43% | 1M |
| 2.29% | 669.9K |
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 52.24% | 129.9K |
| 🇮🇳India | 19.73% | 49.1K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 10.4% | 25.9K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 10.32% | 25.7K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 7.31% | 18.2K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 93.05% | 231.3K |
| Référence | 5.65% | 14K |
| 1.3% | 3.2K |
This in-depth Supabase vs Trigger.dev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Supabase is primarily listed under “Backend”, while Trigger.dev is primarily listed under “Orchestration de modèles”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Supabase: Backend; Trigger.dev: Orchestration de modèles); Monthly visits (Supabase: 29.3M; Trigger.dev: 248.6K); Monthly growth (Supabase: 11.7%; Trigger.dev: -25.7%); Favorites (Supabase: 125; Trigger.dev: 85); Website (Supabase: supabase.com; Trigger.dev: trigger.dev). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the Supabase vs Trigger.dev monthly traffic comparison, Supabase currently shows 29.3M visits and Trigger.dev shows 248.6K; Supabase has about 117.7 times the visible traffic of Trigger.dev, an absolute difference of about 29M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Supabase first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Supabase and Trigger.dev currently overlap in shared categories: Backend; shared tags: Open source et Serverless. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Supabase's unique categories/tags are Base de données, Plateforme en tant que service, No-code et Low-code, IA, authentification, BaaS, Backend en tant que service et base de données; Trigger.dev's are Orchestration de modèles, Serverless, Automatisation des Flux de Travail, Agent IA, Orchestration d'IA, Tâches de fond, Tâches cron et outil de développement. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
Supabase has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 136 likes；Trigger.dev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 85 favorites, and 85 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put Supabase on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Backend” and especially Base de données, Plateforme en tant que service, No-code et Low-code, IA, authentification et BaaS. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Supabase also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 29.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Trigger.dev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Orchestration de modèles” and especially Orchestration de modèles, Serverless, Automatisation des Flux de Travail, Agent IA, Orchestration d'IA et Tâches de fond. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Trigger.dev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 248.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Supabase and Trigger.dev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
