AppFlowy
ドキュメント · 175K 月間訪問数
AppFlowyは、プロジェクト、Wiki、チーム向けに設計された、安全なオープンソースのAIワークスペースです。Notionのようなツールに代わるプライバシー第一の選択肢を提供し、ユーザーがセルフホスティングとオフライン機能を通じてデータを所有できるようにします。執筆、検索、タスク自動化のための強力なAIを統合し、ローカルおよびクラウドベースのモデルの両方をサポートします。
製品概要
AppFlowy 製品概要
AppFlowyは、プロジェクト、Wiki、チーム向けに設計された、安全なオープンソースのAIワークスペースです。Notionのようなツールに代わるプライバシー第一の選択肢を提供し、ユーザーがセルフホスティングとオフライン機能を通じてデータを所有できるようにします。執筆、検索、タスク自動化のための強力なAIを統合し、ローカルおよびクラウドベースのモデルの両方をサポートします。
Preview
FlowUs 製品概要
FlowUsは、ドキュメント、ノート、データベース、プロジェクト管理を統合されたワークスペースにまとめた次世代の知識管理・コラボレーションプラットフォームです。強力なAIアシスタントがネイティブに組み込まれており、個人やチームのワークフローを効率化します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
AppFlowy vs FlowUs monthly traffic
Compare AppFlowy and FlowUs by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the AppFlowy vs FlowUs monthly traffic comparison, AppFlowy currently shows 175K visits and FlowUs shows 1.6M; FlowUs has about 8.9 times the visible traffic of AppFlowy, an absolute difference of about 1.4M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
FlowUs is registered at the flowus.cn/product subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
AppFlowy monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
175K
平均滞在時間
1:14
訪問あたりページ数
2.5
直帰率
41.14%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 134.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 171.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 160.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 173.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 158.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 175K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 36.16% | 63.3K |
| 🇮🇳India | 21.42% | 37.5K |
| 🇪🇸Spain | 14.33% | 25.1K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 14.22% | 24.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 13.87% | 24.3K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 77.14% | 135K |
| 参照元 | 21.41% | 37.5K |
| Eメール | 1.45% | 2.5K |
検索キーワード
app flowyappflowyappflowy 유료appflowy docker portainerappflowy for windows
FlowUs monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
1.6M
平均滞在時間
2:40
訪問あたりページ数
4.61
直帰率
41.43%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 2.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 1.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 1.7M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 1.6M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳China | 92.89% | 1.4M |
| 🇺🇸United States | 2.33% | 36.3K |
| 🇭🇰Hong Kong | 1.8% | 28K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 1.8% | 28K |
| 🇸🇬Singapore | 1.18% | 18.4K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 80.62% | 1.3M |
| 参照元 | 19.31% | 300.8K |
| Eメール | 0.07% | 1.1K |
検索キーワード
flowus咖喱君咖喱君官网咖喱君的资源库息流
Traffic-based selection guidance: FlowUs is registered under a flowus.cn subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing FlowUs for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of AppFlowy and FlowUs
AppFlowy Core features
知識管理
プロジェクト管理
ドキュメント
ライティングアシスタント
FlowUs Core features
知識管理
プロジェクト管理
書くこと
メモ作成
Use cases
AppFlowy Use cases
AIライター
コラボレーション
知識ベース
ノート取り
Notion代替
プロジェクト管理
オープンソース
プライバシー
セルフホスト
タスク管理
ウィキ
FlowUs Use cases
AIライター
コラボレーション
知識ベース
ノート取り
Notion代替
プロジェクト管理
データベース
ドキュメント
第二の脳
チームコラボレーション
ワークスペース
AppFlowy vs FlowUs：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth AppFlowy vs FlowUs comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. AppFlowy is primarily listed under “ドキュメント”, while FlowUs is primarily listed under “書くこと”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (AppFlowy: ドキュメント; FlowUs: 書くこと); Monthly visits (AppFlowy: 175K; FlowUs: 1.6M); Monthly growth (AppFlowy: 10.7%; FlowUs: -6.4%); Favorites (AppFlowy: 112; FlowUs: 95); Website (AppFlowy: appflowy.com; FlowUs: flowus.cn). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the AppFlowy vs FlowUs monthly traffic comparison, AppFlowy currently shows 175K visits and FlowUs shows 1.6M; FlowUs has about 8.9 times the visible traffic of AppFlowy, an absolute difference of about 1.4M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
FlowUs is registered at the flowus.cn/product subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
FlowUs is registered under a flowus.cn subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing FlowUs for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
AppFlowy and FlowUs currently overlap in shared categories: 知識管理、プロジェクト管理; shared tags: AIライター、コラボレーション、知識ベース、ノート取り、Notion代替、プロジェクト管理. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
AppFlowy's unique categories/tags are ドキュメント、ライティングアシスタント、オープンソース、プライバシー、セルフホスト、タスク管理、ウィキ; FlowUs's are 書くこと、メモ作成、データベース、ドキュメント、第二の脳、チームコラボレーション、ワークスペース. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
AppFlowy has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 98 likes；FlowUs has no verified rating, 0 comments, 95 favorites, and 99 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate AppFlowy first
Put AppFlowy on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “ドキュメント” and especially ドキュメント、ライティングアシスタント、オープンソース、プライバシー、セルフホスト、タスク管理. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
AppFlowy also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 175K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate FlowUs first
Put FlowUs on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “書くこと” and especially 書くこと、メモ作成、データベース、ドキュメント、第二の脳、チームコラボレーション. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
FlowUs also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 1.6M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in AppFlowy and FlowUs, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between AppFlowy and FlowUs?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.