BrowserAct
ウェブスクレイピング · 116.8K 月間訪問数
BrowserActは、AIを搭載したノーコードのウェブスクレイパーで、ユーザーが自然言語コマンドを使ってあらゆるウェブサイトからデータを抽出できるようにします。AIエージェントとの簡単な統合のために設計されており、一行のコードも書かずに市場調査、リードジェネレーション、コンテンツモニタリングのためのデータ収集を自動化します。
製品概要
BrowserAct 製品概要
BrowserActは、AIを搭載したノーコードのウェブスクレイパーで、ユーザーが自然言語コマンドを使ってあらゆるウェブサイトからデータを抽出できるようにします。AIエージェントとの簡単な統合のために設計されており、一行のコードも書かずに市場調査、リードジェネレーション、コンテンツモニタリングのためのデータ収集を自動化します。
Preview
Crawly 製品概要
CrawlyはDiffbotが開発したAI搭載のウェブクローラーで、ウェブサイト全体から構造化データを自動的に抽出します。URLを入力するだけで、Crawlyがサイトをスパイダーし、記事、製品、ディスカッションなどの重要な情報を取得し、コーディング不要でクリーンなJSONまたはCSVデータに変換します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | BrowserAct | Crawly |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | ウェブスクレイピング | ウェブスクレイピング |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-03 | 2025-08-10 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | www.browseract.com | crawly.diffbot.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 116.8K | 1.8K |
| 月間成長率 | -14.1% | 276.6% |
| お気に入り | 110 | 98 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
BrowserAct vs Crawly monthly traffic
Compare BrowserAct and Crawly by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the BrowserAct vs Crawly monthly traffic comparison, BrowserAct currently shows 116.8K visits and Crawly shows 1.8K; BrowserAct has about 65.3 times the visible traffic of Crawly, an absolute difference of about 115K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
BrowserAct monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
116.8K
平均滞在時間
1:00
訪問あたりページ数
2.38
直帰率
41.7%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 72.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 107.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 137.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 172.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 135.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 116.8K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 41.01% | 47.9K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 17.56% | 20.5K |
| 🇭🇰Hong Kong | 14.99% | 17.5K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 14.35% | 16.8K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 12.09% | 14.1K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 89.84% | 104.9K |
| 参照元 | 9.6% | 11.2K |
| Eメール | 0.56% | 654 |
検索キーワード
browser actbrowseractbrowseract обзорclaude skillsoutscraper
Crawly monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
1.8K
平均滞在時間
0:31
訪問あたりページ数
1.15
直帰率
93.85%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 2.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 784 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 640 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 475 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 1.8K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 82.43% | 1.5K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 9.9% | 177 |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 7.67% | 137 |
検索キーワード
crawl urlcrawlyonline web crawlerwebsite crawlerwebsite crawler online
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate BrowserAct first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of BrowserAct and Crawly
BrowserAct Core features
ウェブスクレイピング
市場調査
自動化
ノーコード
Crawly Core features
ウェブスクレイピング
市場調査
API
自動化
Use cases
BrowserAct Use cases
自動化
データ抽出
リード生成
市場調査
ノーコード
Webスクレイピング
AIエージェント
ブラウザ自動化
データマイニング
自然言語処理
Crawly Use cases
自動化
データ抽出
リード生成
市場調査
ノーコード
Webスクレイピング
API
Diffbot
JSON
構造化データ
ウェブクローラー
BrowserAct vs Crawly：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth BrowserAct vs Crawly comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. BrowserAct is primarily listed under “ウェブスクレイピング”, while Crawly is primarily listed under “ウェブスクレイピング”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (BrowserAct: 116.8K; Crawly: 1.8K); Monthly growth (BrowserAct: -14.1%; Crawly: 276.6%); Favorites (BrowserAct: 110; Crawly: 98); Website (BrowserAct: www.browseract.com; Crawly: crawly.diffbot.com); Added (BrowserAct: 2025-08-03; Crawly: 2025-08-10). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the BrowserAct vs Crawly monthly traffic comparison, BrowserAct currently shows 116.8K visits and Crawly shows 1.8K; BrowserAct has about 65.3 times the visible traffic of Crawly, an absolute difference of about 115K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate BrowserAct first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
BrowserAct and Crawly currently overlap in shared categories: ウェブスクレイピング、市場調査; shared tags: 自動化、データ抽出、リード生成、市場調査、ノーコード、Webスクレイピング. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
BrowserAct's unique categories/tags are 自動化、ノーコード、AIエージェント、ブラウザ自動化、データマイニング、自然言語処理; Crawly's are API、自動化、Diffbot、JSON、構造化データ、ウェブクローラー. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
BrowserAct has no verified rating, 0 comments, 110 favorites, and 112 likes；Crawly has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 101 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate BrowserAct first
Put BrowserAct on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “ウェブスクレイピング” and especially 自動化、ノーコード、AIエージェント、ブラウザ自動化、データマイニング、自然言語処理. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
BrowserAct also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 116.8K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Crawly first
Put Crawly on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “ウェブスクレイピング” and especially API、自動化、Diffbot、JSON、構造化データ、ウェブクローラー. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Crawly also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 1.8K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in BrowserAct and Crawly, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between BrowserAct and Crawly?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.
スポンサー
Discover more tools in the same category.
