Cal.com
顧客管理 · 3.6M 月間訪問数
Cal.comは、個人、チーム、開発者向けに設計されたオープンソースのスケジューリングインフラです。高度にカスタマイズ可能でプライバシーを第一に考えた従来のスケジューリングツールの代替手段を提供し、シームレスな統合、セルフホスティング、ホワイトラベリングにより、会議やアポイントメントを効率的に管理できます。
製品概要
Cal.com 製品概要
Cal.comは、個人、チーム、開発者向けに設計されたオープンソースのスケジューリングインフラです。高度にカスタマイズ可能でプライバシーを第一に考えた従来のスケジューリングツールの代替手段を提供し、シームレスな統合、セルフホスティング、ホワイトラベリングにより、会議やアポイントメントを効率的に管理できます。
Preview
Retime 製品概要
Retimeは、ワークフローを効率化するために設計されたインテリジェントな会議スケジューリングおよび管理プラットフォームです。単なる予約にとどまらず、議題作成、アクションアイテムの追跡、シームレスなカレンダー同期を統合し、すべての会議を生産的で成果志向のものにします。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
Cal.com vs Retime monthly traffic
Compare Cal.com and Retime by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Cal.com vs Retime monthly traffic comparison, Cal.com currently shows 3.6M visits and Retime shows 75; Cal.com has about 47,482.2 times the visible traffic of Retime, an absolute difference of about 3.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Cal.com monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
3.6M
平均滞在時間
3:04
訪問あたりページ数
5.59
直帰率
38.61%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 2.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 3.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 3M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 3.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 3.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 3.6M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 64.91% | 2.3M |
| 🇮🇳India | 16.88% | 601.1K |
| 🇫🇷France | 6.27% | 223.3K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.15% | 219K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 5.79% | 206.2K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 81.55% | 2.9M |
| 参照元 | 12.66% | 450.8K |
| Eメール | 5.79% | 206.2K |
検索キーワード
calcal aical comcal.comcalendly
Retime monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
75
平均滞在時間
0:00
訪問あたりページ数
1.13
直帰率
34.35%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 580 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 206 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 752 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 318 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 75 月間訪問数
検索キーワード
reditimeretimes
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Cal.com first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Cal.com and Retime
Cal.com Core features
スケジュール
顧客管理
API
リードジェネレーション
Retime Core features
スケジュール
カレンダー管理
会議管理
Use cases
Cal.com Use cases
予約
カレンダー
会議管理
生産性
スケジューリング
チームコラボレーション
Calendly 代替
開発者API
オープンソース
セルフホスト
Retime Use cases
予約
カレンダー
会議管理
生産性
スケジューリング
チームコラボレーション
行動項目
アジェンダ
Google カレンダー
Office 365
時間管理
Best suited roles
Cal.com Best suited roles
確認済みデータなし
Retime Best suited roles
コンサルタント
カスタマーサクセスマネージャー
役員
フリーランサー
人事マネージャー
マーケティングマネージャー
プロジェクトマネージャー
リクルーター
営業担当者
チームリーダー
Cal.com vs Retime：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Cal.com vs Retime comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Cal.com is primarily listed under “顧客管理”, while Retime is primarily listed under “カレンダー管理”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Cal.com: 顧客管理; Retime: カレンダー管理); Monthly visits (Cal.com: 3.6M; Retime: 75); Monthly growth (Cal.com: 5.2%; Retime: -76.4%); Favorites (Cal.com: 117; Retime: 119); Website (Cal.com: cal.com; Retime: retime.so). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Cal.com vs Retime monthly traffic comparison, Cal.com currently shows 3.6M visits and Retime shows 75; Cal.com has about 47,482.2 times the visible traffic of Retime, an absolute difference of about 3.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Cal.com first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Cal.com and Retime currently overlap in shared categories: スケジュール; shared tags: 予約、カレンダー、会議管理、生産性、スケジューリング、チームコラボレーション. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Cal.com's unique categories/tags are 顧客管理、API、リードジェネレーション、Calendly 代替、開発者API、オープンソース、セルフホスト; Retime's are カレンダー管理、会議管理、行動項目、アジェンダ、Google カレンダー、Office 365、時間管理. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Cal.com has no verified rating, 0 comments, 117 favorites, and 133 likes；Retime has no verified rating, 0 comments, 119 favorites, and 108 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Cal.com first
Put Cal.com on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “顧客管理” and especially 顧客管理、API、リードジェネレーション、Calendly 代替、開発者API、オープンソース. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Cal.com also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.6M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Retime first
Put Retime on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “カレンダー管理” and especially カレンダー管理、会議管理、行動項目、アジェンダ、Google カレンダー、Office 365, or the users include コンサルタント、カスタマーサクセスマネージャー、役員、フリーランサー. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Retime also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 75 verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Cal.com and Retime, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Cal.com and Retime?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.