centered
集中 · 23.2K 月間訪問数
centeredは、ユーザーが「フロー状態」を達成するのを助けるために設計されたAI搭載の集中力・生産性向上アプリです。タスクマネージャー、セッションタイマー、注意散漫ブロッカーを、Noahという名のユニークなAIコーチと組み合わせ、ユーザーの作業をガイドします。厳選された音楽とコミュニティ機能を備え、リモートワーカー、学生、その他集中を妨げるものを排除し、ディープワークを達成したいすべての人々のために作られています。
VS
getfocusai
Chrome 拡張機能 · 6.2K 月間訪問数
FocusAIは、AIを搭載した生産性コーチ兼インテリジェントなウェブサイトブロッカーです。ブラウザ拡張機能として、作業コンテキストを理解して注意散漫になるサイトをブロックし、ディープワークの達成と先延ばしの解消を支援します。学生、開発者、専門家に最適です。
製品概要
centered 製品概要
centeredは、ユーザーが「フロー状態」を達成するのを助けるために設計されたAI搭載の集中力・生産性向上アプリです。タスクマネージャー、セッションタイマー、注意散漫ブロッカーを、Noahという名のユニークなAIコーチと組み合わせ、ユーザーの作業をガイドします。厳選された音楽とコミュニティ機能を備え、リモートワーカー、学生、その他集中を妨げるものを排除し、ディープワークを達成したいすべての人々のために作られています。
Preview
getfocusai 製品概要
FocusAIは、AIを搭載した生産性コーチ兼インテリジェントなウェブサイトブロッカーです。ブラウザ拡張機能として、作業コンテキストを理解して注意散漫になるサイトをブロックし、ディープワークの達成と先延ばしの解消を支援します。学生、開発者、専門家に最適です。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | centered | getfocusai |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 集中 | Chrome 拡張機能 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-14 | 2025-08-02 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | 無料 |
| 公式サイト | www.thesukha.co | www.getfocusai.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ブラウザ拡張 |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 23.2K | 6.2K |
| 月間成長率 | -0.3% | 2.6% |
| お気に入り | 144 | 105 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
centered vs getfocusai monthly traffic
Compare centered and getfocusai by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the centered vs getfocusai monthly traffic comparison, centered currently shows 23.2K visits and getfocusai shows 6.2K; centered has about 3.8 times the visible traffic of getfocusai, an absolute difference of about 17K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
centered monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
23.2K
平均滞在時間
2:25
訪問あたりページ数
2.77
直帰率
48.35%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 14.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 10.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 11.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 18.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 23.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 23.2K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪Germany | 78.67% | 18.2K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 13.19% | 3.1K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 3.16% | 732 |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 2.89% | 670 |
| 🇮🇳India | 2.09% | 484 |
検索キーワード
steven purisukhasukha appsunkha apthe sukha company
getfocusai monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
6.2K
平均滞在時間
4:49
訪問あたりページ数
1.58
直帰率
47.4%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 576 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 2.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 2.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 6.2K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳India | 54.42% | 3.4K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 36.54% | 2.3K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 9.04% | 557 |
検索キーワード
ai friend to watch me on my computer to not get distracted of my workfocus aifocus friend aifocus mode with aiфокус фш аи
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate centered first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of centered and getfocusai
centered Core features
集中
タスク管理
マインドフルネス
getfocusai Core features
集中
タスク管理
Chrome 拡張機能
Use cases
centered Use cases
ディープ・ワーク
集中ブロッカー
ポモドーロ
学習ツール
注意欠陥・多動性障害
AIコーチ
フロー状態
焦点
生産性
リモートワーク
タスクマネージャー
getfocusai Use cases
ディープ・ワーク
集中ブロッカー
ポモドーロ
学習ツール
AI生産性
Chrome拡張機能
Firefox 拡張機能
集中ツール
生産性コーチ
タスク管理
ウェブサイトブロッカー
centered vs getfocusai：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth centered vs getfocusai comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. centered is primarily listed under “集中”, while getfocusai is primarily listed under “Chrome 拡張機能”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (centered: 集中; getfocusai: Chrome 拡張機能); Product type (centered: Website; getfocusai: Browser extension); Pricing (centered: Freemium; getfocusai: Free); Monthly visits (centered: 23.2K; getfocusai: 6.2K); Monthly growth (centered: -0.3%; getfocusai: 2.6%). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the centered vs getfocusai monthly traffic comparison, centered currently shows 23.2K visits and getfocusai shows 6.2K; centered has about 3.8 times the visible traffic of getfocusai, an absolute difference of about 17K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate centered first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
centered and getfocusai currently overlap in shared categories: 集中、タスク管理; shared tags: ディープ・ワーク、集中ブロッカー、ポモドーロ、学習ツール. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
centered's unique categories/tags are マインドフルネス、注意欠陥・多動性障害、AIコーチ、フロー状態、焦点、生産性、リモートワーク、タスクマネージャー; getfocusai's are Chrome 拡張機能、AI生産性、Chrome拡張機能、Firefox 拡張機能、集中ツール、生産性コーチ、タスク管理、ウェブサイトブロッカー. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
centered has no verified rating, 0 comments, 144 favorites, and 142 likes；getfocusai has no verified rating, 0 comments, 105 favorites, and 107 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate centered first
Put centered on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “集中” and especially マインドフルネス、注意欠陥・多動性障害、AIコーチ、フロー状態、焦点、生産性. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
centered also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 23.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate getfocusai first
Put getfocusai on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Chrome 拡張機能” and especially Chrome 拡張機能、AI生産性、Chrome拡張機能、Firefox 拡張機能、集中ツール、生産性コーチ. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
getfocusai also currently records: pricing is free, product type is browser extension, 6.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in centered and getfocusai, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between centered and getfocusai?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.