Consensus
学習 · 5.7M 月間訪問数
Consensusは、科学研究のために設計されたAI搭載の検索エンジンです。2億件以上の査読付き論文を検索し、ユーザーの質問に対して証拠に基づいた統合的な回答を提供します。科学文献から主要な知見を直接抽出することで、研究者、学生、専門家の時間を節約します。
製品概要
Consensus 製品概要
Consensusは、科学研究のために設計されたAI搭載の検索エンジンです。2億件以上の査読付き論文を検索し、ユーザーの質問に対して証拠に基づいた統合的な回答を提供します。科学文献から主要な知見を直接抽出することで、研究者、学生、専門家の時間を節約します。
Preview
Profundo 製品概要
Profundoは、データ収集、分析、レポート生成を自動化するために設計されたAI搭載の研究・レポート作成アシスタントです。学者、専門家、個人の研究プロセスを効率化し、深い研究を効率的に行い、時間を節約し、高精度なAIによる洞察に基づいて情報に基づいた意思決定を可能にします。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Consensus | Profundo |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 学習 | 市場情報 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-10 | 2025-08-03 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | consensus.app | www.profundo.app |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 5.7M | 157 |
| 月間成長率 | -2.5% | -82.4% |
| お気に入り | 98 | 83 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Consensus vs Profundo monthly traffic
Compare Consensus and Profundo by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Consensus vs Profundo monthly traffic comparison, Consensus currently shows 5.7M visits and Profundo shows 157; Consensus has about 36,565.8 times the visible traffic of Profundo, an absolute difference of about 5.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Consensus monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
5.7M
平均滞在時間
4:32
訪問あたりページ数
4.37
直帰率
38.7%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 3.5M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 3.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 5.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 5.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 5.7M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 35.36% | 2M |
| 🇺🇸United States | 29.41% | 1.7M |
| 🇵🇪Peru | 12.81% | 735.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 11.61% | 666.5K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 10.81% | 620.6K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 85.92% | 4.9M |
| 参照元 | 12.3% | 706.1K |
| Eメール | 1.78% | 102.2K |
検索キーワード
concensusconsensusconsensus aielicitgoogle scholar
Profundo monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
157
平均滞在時間
0:00
訪問あたりページ数
1.07
直帰率
39.01%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 1.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 3.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 2.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 891 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 157 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 100% | 157 |
検索キーワード
profundo
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Consensus first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Consensus and Profundo
Consensus Core features
学習
ライティング
医療
文献レビュー
Profundo Core features
学習
ライティング
市場情報
学術
Use cases
Consensus Use cases
データ分析
文献レビュー
学術検索
AI検索エンジン
根拠に基づいた
ファクトチェック
研究
研究者
科学論文
学生
Profundo Use cases
データ分析
文献レビュー
学術研究
AIライター
自動レポート
コンテンツ作成
市場調査
レポートジェネレーター
研究アシスタント
Consensus vs Profundo：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Consensus vs Profundo comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Consensus is primarily listed under “学習”, while Profundo is primarily listed under “市場情報”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Consensus: 学習; Profundo: 市場情報); Monthly visits (Consensus: 5.7M; Profundo: 157); Monthly growth (Consensus: -2.5%; Profundo: -82.4%); Favorites (Consensus: 98; Profundo: 83); Website (Consensus: consensus.app; Profundo: www.profundo.app). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Consensus vs Profundo monthly traffic comparison, Consensus currently shows 5.7M visits and Profundo shows 157; Consensus has about 36,565.8 times the visible traffic of Profundo, an absolute difference of about 5.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Consensus first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Consensus and Profundo currently overlap in shared categories: 学習、ライティング; shared tags: データ分析、文献レビュー. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Consensus's unique categories/tags are 医療、文献レビュー、学術検索、AI検索エンジン、根拠に基づいた、ファクトチェック、研究、研究者; Profundo's are 市場情報、学術、学術研究、AIライター、自動レポート、コンテンツ作成、市場調査、レポートジェネレーター. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Consensus has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 90 likes；Profundo has no verified rating, 0 comments, 83 favorites, and 98 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Consensus first
Put Consensus on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “学習” and especially 医療、文献レビュー、学術検索、AI検索エンジン、根拠に基づいた、ファクトチェック. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Consensus also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 5.7M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Profundo first
Put Profundo on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “市場情報” and especially 市場情報、学術、学術研究、AIライター、自動レポート、コンテンツ作成. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Profundo also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 157 verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Consensus and Profundo, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Consensus and Profundo?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.