Contacted
メール · 766 月間訪問数
Contactedは、トランザクションメールの作成と統合を自動化するAI搭載のメールビルダーです。開発者は簡単な英語のプロンプトを使用して、プロフェッショナルでブランドに合ったメールを生成でき、テンプレートや複雑な設定が不要になり、開発時間を大幅に節約できます。
製品概要
Contacted 製品概要
Contactedは、トランザクションメールの作成と統合を自動化するAI搭載のメールビルダーです。開発者は簡単な英語のプロンプトを使用して、プロフェッショナルでブランドに合ったメールを生成でき、テンプレートや複雑な設定が不要になり、開発時間を大幅に節約できます。
Preview
Mails.ai 製品概要
Mails.aiは、大規模なアウトリーチ向けに設計されたAI搭載のコールドメールソフトウェアです。無制限のメールアカウント、AIによるコンテンツ作成、強力な二重層メールウォームアップシステムを備えたスマートで自動化されたメールキャンペーンを実行し、ビジネスの成長を支援します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Contacted | Mails.ai |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | メール | メールマーケティング |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-03 | 2025-08-01 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | contacted.io | www.mails.ai |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 766 | 22.5K |
| 月間成長率 | -21% | -7.4% |
| お気に入り | 89 | 147 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Contacted vs Mails.ai monthly traffic
Compare Contacted and Mails.ai by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Contacted vs Mails.ai monthly traffic comparison, Contacted currently shows 766 visits and Mails.ai shows 22.5K; Mails.ai has about 29.4 times the visible traffic of Contacted, an absolute difference of about 21.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Contacted monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
766
平均滞在時間
0:44
訪問あたりページ数
1.49
直帰率
41.59%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 723 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 970 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 766 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸Spain | 100% | 766 |
検索キーワード
contacted
Mails.ai monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
22.5K
平均滞在時間
0:29
訪問あたりページ数
1.79
直帰率
37.71%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 31.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 35.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 29K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 27.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 24.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 22.5K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 36.9% | 8.3K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 24.82% | 5.6K |
| 🇮🇳India | 21.4% | 4.8K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 9.78% | 2.2K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 7.1% | 1.6K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 80.76% | 18.2K |
| 参照元 | 19.24% | 4.3K |
検索キーワード
email warmup freefree email warmupmails aimails.aimailsai
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Mails.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Contacted and Mails.ai
Contacted Core features
メールマーケティング
自動化
メール
Mails.ai Core features
メールマーケティング
自動化
リードジェネレーション
Use cases
Contacted Use cases
メール自動化
AIメールビルダー
API
ブランド一貫性
開発者ツール
メール配信
メール連携
テンプレートなし
トランザクションメール
Mails.ai Use cases
メール自動化
AIライター
コールドメール
到達性
メールアウトリーチ
メールウォームアップ
リード生成
営業自動化
Contacted vs Mails.ai：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Contacted vs Mails.ai comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Contacted is primarily listed under “メール”, while Mails.ai is primarily listed under “メールマーケティング”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Contacted: メール; Mails.ai: メールマーケティング); Monthly visits (Contacted: 766; Mails.ai: 22.5K); Monthly growth (Contacted: -21%; Mails.ai: -7.4%); Favorites (Contacted: 89; Mails.ai: 147); Website (Contacted: contacted.io; Mails.ai: www.mails.ai). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Contacted vs Mails.ai monthly traffic comparison, Contacted currently shows 766 visits and Mails.ai shows 22.5K; Mails.ai has about 29.4 times the visible traffic of Contacted, an absolute difference of about 21.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Mails.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Contacted and Mails.ai currently overlap in shared categories: メールマーケティング、自動化; shared tags: メール自動化. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Contacted's unique categories/tags are メール、AIメールビルダー、API、ブランド一貫性、開発者ツール、メール配信、メール連携、テンプレートなし; Mails.ai's are リードジェネレーション、AIライター、コールドメール、到達性、メールアウトリーチ、メールウォームアップ、リード生成、営業自動化. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Contacted has no verified rating, 0 comments, 89 favorites, and 93 likes；Mails.ai has no verified rating, 0 comments, 147 favorites, and 152 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Contacted first
Put Contacted on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “メール” and especially メール、AIメールビルダー、API、ブランド一貫性、開発者ツール、メール配信. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Contacted also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 766 verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Mails.ai first
Put Mails.ai on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “メールマーケティング” and especially リードジェネレーション、AIライター、コールドメール、到達性、メールアウトリーチ、メールウォームアップ. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Mails.ai also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 22.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Contacted and Mails.ai, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Contacted and Mails.ai?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.