Craft
知識管理 · 774.4K 月間訪問数
Craftは、ノート、タスク、アイデアのために美しくデザインされたネイティブドキュメントエディタです。ローカルAIアシスタント、タスク管理、柔軟な整理といった強力な機能と、楽しく高速なオフラインファーストのユーザー体験を組み合わせ、作家、思想家、チームが思考を捉え、構造化するのに最適なツールです。
製品概要
Craft 製品概要
Craftは、ノート、タスク、アイデアのために美しくデザインされたネイティブドキュメントエディタです。ローカルAIアシスタント、タスク管理、柔軟な整理といった強力な機能と、楽しく高速なオフラインファーストのユーザー体験を組み合わせ、作家、思想家、チームが思考を捉え、構造化するのに最適なツールです。
Preview
Macro 製品概要
Macroは、スピードとコラボレーションのために設計されたAI搭載の統合ワークスペースです。リンク可能なノート、ブレインストーミング用の無限のキャンバス、インテリジェントなドキュメント分析、スレッド形式のチームチャットを、単一の安全なエンタープライズ対応プラットフォームに統合します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Craft | Macro |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 知識管理 | AIドキュメント分析 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-08 | 2025-08-05 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | 未確認 |
| 公式サイト | www.craft.do | macro.com |
| 製品タイプ | アプリ | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 774.4K | 71.7K |
| 月間成長率 | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| お気に入り | 139 | 102 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Craft vs Macro monthly traffic
Compare Craft and Macro by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Craft vs Macro monthly traffic comparison, Craft currently shows 774.4K visits and Macro shows 71.7K; Craft has about 10.8 times the visible traffic of Macro, an absolute difference of about 702.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Craft is registered at the www.craft.do/zh-CN subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Craft monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
774.4K
平均滞在時間
3:04
訪問あたりページ数
4.1
直帰率
41.96%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 1.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 867.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 807K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 757.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 774.4K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 46.79% | 362.3K |
| 🇨🇳China | 18.27% | 141.5K |
| 🇯🇵Japan | 15.79% | 122.3K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 11.21% | 86.8K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 7.94% | 61.5K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 87.07% | 674.3K |
| 参照元 | 10.14% | 78.5K |
| Eメール | 2.79% | 21.6K |
検索キーワード
craftcraft agentcraft agentscraft appcraft docs
Macro monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
71.7K
平均滞在時間
0:52
訪問あたりページ数
1.73
直帰率
39.16%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 134.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 100.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 78.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 70.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 70.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 71.7K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 57.43% | 41.2K |
| 🇵🇭Philippines | 12.22% | 8.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 10.84% | 7.8K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 10.6% | 7.6K |
| 🇦🇺Australia | 8.91% | 6.4K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 98.33% | 70.5K |
| 参照元 | 1.67% | 1.2K |
検索キーワード
400 ib questions400 questions investment bankingmacromacro macro "macro"what is macro com
Traffic-based selection guidance: Craft is registered under a www.craft.do subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Craft for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Craft and Macro
Craft Core features
メモ作成
知識管理
タスク管理
Macro Core features
メモ作成
AIドキュメント分析
オールインワンワークスペース
プロジェクト管理
Use cases
Craft Use cases
AIアシスタント
コラボレーション
ノート取り
生産性
ドキュメントエディター
知識ベース
マークダウン
オフラインノート
タスク管理
ライティング
Macro Use cases
AIアシスタント
コラボレーション
ノート取り
生産性
オールインワン
図作成
文書分析
プロジェクト管理
セキュリティ
チームチャット
ワークスペース
Craft vs Macro：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Craft vs Macro comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Craft is primarily listed under “知識管理”, while Macro is primarily listed under “AIドキュメント分析”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Craft: 知識管理; Macro: AIドキュメント分析); Product type (Craft: App; Macro: Website); Pricing (Craft: Freemium; Macro: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Craft: 774.4K; Macro: 71.7K); Monthly growth (Craft: 2.2%; Macro: 1.4%). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Craft vs Macro monthly traffic comparison, Craft currently shows 774.4K visits and Macro shows 71.7K; Craft has about 10.8 times the visible traffic of Macro, an absolute difference of about 702.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Craft is registered at the www.craft.do/zh-CN subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Craft is registered under a www.craft.do subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Craft for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Craft and Macro currently overlap in shared categories: メモ作成; shared tags: AIアシスタント、コラボレーション、ノート取り、生産性. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Craft's unique categories/tags are 知識管理、タスク管理、ドキュメントエディター、知識ベース、マークダウン、オフラインノート、ライティング; Macro's are AIドキュメント分析、オールインワンワークスペース、プロジェクト管理、オールインワン、図作成、文書分析、セキュリティ、チームチャット. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Craft has no verified rating, 0 comments, 139 favorites, and 129 likes；Macro has no verified rating, 0 comments, 102 favorites, and 122 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Craft first
Put Craft on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “知識管理” and especially 知識管理、タスク管理、ドキュメントエディター、知識ベース、マークダウン、オフラインノート. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Craft also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 774.4K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Macro first
Put Macro on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “AIドキュメント分析” and especially AIドキュメント分析、オールインワンワークスペース、プロジェクト管理、オールインワン、図作成、文書分析. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Macro also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 71.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Craft and Macro, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Craft and Macro?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.