精密な制御が可能なプロ級のブラウザベースAI画像生成プラットフォーム。70,000以上のStable Diffusion、LoRA、ControlNetモデルにアクセスし、高性能なハードウェアなしで素晴らしいビジュアルを制作。アーティスト、デザイナー、趣味での利用に最適です。
Shakkerは、多様なモデル(FLUXやStable Diffusionを含む)の広範なライブラリ、オンラインComfyUIやA1111などの統合されたプロフェッショナルツール、そして強力な画像生成、編集、モデルトレーニング機能を提供する、オールインワンの生成AIデザインプラットフォームです。初心者から専門家まで、あらゆるレベルのクリエイターに対応しています。
製品概要
Diffus 製品概要
精密な制御が可能なプロ級のブラウザベースAI画像生成プラットフォーム。70,000以上のStable Diffusion、LoRA、ControlNetモデルにアクセスし、高性能なハードウェアなしで素晴らしいビジュアルを制作。アーティスト、デザイナー、趣味での利用に最適です。
Shakker 製品概要
Shakkerは、多様なモデル(FLUXやStable Diffusionを含む)の広範なライブラリ、オンラインComfyUIやA1111などの統合されたプロフェッショナルツール、そして強力な画像生成、編集、モデルトレーニング機能を提供する、オールインワンの生成AIデザインプラットフォームです。初心者から専門家まで、あらゆるレベルのクリエイターに対応しています。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Diffus | Shakker |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | デジタルアート | 生成芸術 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-04 | 2025-08-15 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | www.diffus.me | www.shakker.ai |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 154.9K | 307.2K |
| 月間成長率 | -7.7% | 13.4% |
| お気に入り | 122 | 125 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Diffus vs Shakker monthly traffic
Compare Diffus and Shakker by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Diffus vs Shakker monthly traffic comparison, Diffus currently shows 154.9K visits and Shakker shows 307.2K; Shakker has about 2 times the visible traffic of Diffus, an absolute difference of about 152.3K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Diffus is registered at the www.diffus.me/zh-hk subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Diffus monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 208.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 188.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 155.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 167.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 154.9K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵Japan | 50.41% | 78.1K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 20.17% | 31.3K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 16.93% | 26.2K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 6.39% | 9.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 6.1% | 9.5K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 88.1% | 136.5K |
| 参照元 | 7.27% | 11.3K |
| Eメール | 4.63% | 7.2K |
検索キーワード
Shakker monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 671K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 401.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 310.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 332.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 270.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 307.2K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳China | 24.8% | 76.2K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 24.56% | 75.4K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 19.93% | 61.2K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 17.24% | 53K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 13.47% | 41.4K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 83.67% | 257K |
| 参照元 | 16.07% | 49.4K |
| Eメール | 0.26% | 799 |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Diffus and Shakker
Diffus Core features
Shakker Core features
Use cases
Diffus Use cases
Shakker Use cases
Diffus vs Shakker:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Diffus vs Shakker comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Diffus is primarily listed under “デジタルアート”, while Shakker is primarily listed under “生成芸術”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Diffus: デジタルアート; Shakker: 生成芸術); Monthly visits (Diffus: 154.9K; Shakker: 307.2K); Monthly growth (Diffus: -7.7%; Shakker: 13.4%); Favorites (Diffus: 122; Shakker: 125); Website (Diffus: www.diffus.me; Shakker: www.shakker.ai). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Diffus vs Shakker monthly traffic comparison, Diffus currently shows 154.9K visits and Shakker shows 307.2K; Shakker has about 2 times the visible traffic of Diffus, an absolute difference of about 152.3K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Diffus is registered at the www.diffus.me/zh-hk subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Shakker first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Diffus and Shakker currently overlap in shared categories: グラフィックデザイン、画像生成; shared tags: キャラクターデザイン、コンセプトアート、LoRA、モデルライブラリ、ステーブルディフュージョン、テキスト画像. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Diffus's unique categories/tags are デジタルアート、AIアート、ブラウザベース、ControlNet、画像生成、インペインティング; Shakker's are 生成芸術、デザインアシスタント、a1111、AIアートジェネレーター、ComfyUI、顔交換、変動、画像編集. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Diffus has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 107 likes;Shakker has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 110 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Diffus first
Put Diffus on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “デジタルアート” and especially デジタルアート、AIアート、ブラウザベース、ControlNet、画像生成、インペインティング. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Diffus also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 154.9K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Shakker first
Put Shakker on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “生成芸術” and especially 生成芸術、デザインアシスタント、a1111、AIアートジェネレーター、ComfyUI、顔交換. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Shakker also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 307.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Diffus and Shakker, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




