Diffus
デジタルアート · 154.9K 月間訪問数
精密な制御が可能なプロ級のブラウザベースAI画像生成プラットフォーム。70,000以上のStable Diffusion、LoRA、ControlNetモデルにアクセスし、高性能なハードウェアなしで素晴らしいビジュアルを制作。アーティスト、デザイナー、趣味での利用に最適です。
製品概要
Diffus 製品概要
精密な制御が可能なプロ級のブラウザベースAI画像生成プラットフォーム。70,000以上のStable Diffusion、LoRA、ControlNetモデルにアクセスし、高性能なハードウェアなしで素晴らしいビジュアルを制作。アーティスト、デザイナー、趣味での利用に最適です。
Preview
Shenbi 製品概要
Shenbiは、Maoyanがエンターテインメント業界向けに設計した強力なAI搭載クリエイティブプラットフォームです。映画ポスター、キャラクターコンセプト、プロモーションアートなど、高品質で映画的なビジュアルの生成に特化しており、マーケティングおよび制作チームのクリエイティブワークフローを劇的に加速させます。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Diffus | Shenbi |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | デジタルアート | コンセプトアート |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-04 | 2025-08-02 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | www.diffus.me | shenbi.maoyan.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 154.9K | 903 |
| 月間成長率 | -7.7% | -17.8% |
| お気に入り | 122 | 84 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Diffus vs Shenbi monthly traffic
Compare Diffus and Shenbi by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Diffus vs Shenbi monthly traffic comparison, Diffus currently shows 154.9K visits and Shenbi shows 903; Diffus has about 171.6 times the visible traffic of Shenbi, an absolute difference of about 154K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Diffus is registered at the www.diffus.me/zh-hk subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Diffus monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
154.9K
平均滞在時間
6:13
訪問あたりページ数
6.23
直帰率
32.28%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 208.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 188.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 155.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 167.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 154.9K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵Japan | 50.41% | 78.1K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 20.17% | 31.3K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 16.93% | 26.2K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 6.39% | 9.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 6.1% | 9.5K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 88.1% | 136.5K |
| 参照元 | 7.27% | 11.3K |
| Eメール | 4.63% | 7.2K |
検索キーワード
automatic1111civitaipony diffusionstable diffusionstable video diffusion
Shenbi monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
903
平均滞在時間
1:33
訪問あたりページ数
3
直帰率
0%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 1.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 2.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 2.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 2.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 1.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 903 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳China | 100% | 903 |
検索キーワード
神筆馬良
Traffic-based selection guidance: Diffus is registered under a www.diffus.me subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Diffus for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Diffus and Shenbi
Diffus Core features
グラフィックデザイン
画像生成
デジタルアート
Shenbi Core features
グラフィックデザイン
画像生成
コンセプトアート
広告
Use cases
Diffus Use cases
AIアート
キャラクターデザイン
コンセプトアート
画像生成
ブラウザベース
ControlNet
インペインティング
LoRA
モデルライブラリ
ステーブルディフュージョン
テキスト画像
Shenbi Use cases
AIアート
キャラクターデザイン
コンセプトアート
画像生成
AI生成コンテンツ
エンターテイメント
映画制作
マオヤン
マーケティング
映画ポスター
Diffus vs Shenbi：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Diffus vs Shenbi comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Diffus is primarily listed under “デジタルアート”, while Shenbi is primarily listed under “コンセプトアート”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Diffus: デジタルアート; Shenbi: コンセプトアート); Monthly visits (Diffus: 154.9K; Shenbi: 903); Monthly growth (Diffus: -7.7%; Shenbi: -17.8%); Favorites (Diffus: 122; Shenbi: 84); Website (Diffus: www.diffus.me; Shenbi: shenbi.maoyan.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Diffus vs Shenbi monthly traffic comparison, Diffus currently shows 154.9K visits and Shenbi shows 903; Diffus has about 171.6 times the visible traffic of Shenbi, an absolute difference of about 154K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Diffus is registered at the www.diffus.me/zh-hk subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Diffus is registered under a www.diffus.me subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Diffus for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Diffus and Shenbi currently overlap in shared categories: グラフィックデザイン、画像生成; shared tags: AIアート、キャラクターデザイン、コンセプトアート、画像生成. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Diffus's unique categories/tags are デジタルアート、ブラウザベース、ControlNet、インペインティング、LoRA、モデルライブラリ、ステーブルディフュージョン、テキスト画像; Shenbi's are コンセプトアート、広告、AI生成コンテンツ、エンターテイメント、映画制作、マオヤン、マーケティング、映画ポスター. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Diffus has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 107 likes；Shenbi has no verified rating, 0 comments, 84 favorites, and 108 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Diffus first
Put Diffus on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “デジタルアート” and especially デジタルアート、ブラウザベース、ControlNet、インペインティング、LoRA、モデルライブラリ. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Diffus also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 154.9K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Shenbi first
Put Shenbi on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “コンセプトアート” and especially コンセプトアート、広告、AI生成コンテンツ、エンターテイメント、映画制作、マオヤン. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Shenbi also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 903 verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Diffus and Shenbi, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Diffus and Shenbi?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.