Adobe Photoshop向けのAIアート生成プラグイン。簡単なテキストプロンプトを使って、ワークフロー内で直接画像の作成、編集、強化が可能です。アーティスト、デザイナー、写真家に最適です。
Leonardo.aiは、高品質なビジュアルアセットを作成するための包括的な生成AIスイートです。画像・動画生成、AIキャンバス、3Dテクスチャリング、多数のファインチューニングモデルなど、幅広いツールを提供します。個人のクリエイター、共同作業チーム、開発者に最適で、品質、スピード、スタイルの一貫性を重視しています。
製品概要
diffusely 製品概要
Adobe Photoshop向けのAIアート生成プラグイン。簡単なテキストプロンプトを使って、ワークフロー内で直接画像の作成、編集、強化が可能です。アーティスト、デザイナー、写真家に最適です。
Leonardo.ai 製品概要
Leonardo.aiは、高品質なビジュアルアセットを作成するための包括的な生成AIスイートです。画像・動画生成、AIキャンバス、3Dテクスチャリング、多数のファインチューニングモデルなど、幅広いツールを提供します。個人のクリエイター、共同作業チーム、開発者に最適で、品質、スピード、スタイルの一貫性を重視しています。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | diffusely | Leonardo.ai |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 生成芸術 | 生成芸術 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-07 | 2025-08-07 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | diffusely.ai | leonardo.ai |
| 製品タイプ | ブラウザ拡張 | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 788 | 10.9M |
| 月間成長率 | -78.9% | 1.7% |
| お気に入り | 112 | 115 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
diffusely vs Leonardo.ai monthly traffic
Compare diffusely and Leonardo.ai by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the diffusely vs Leonardo.ai monthly traffic comparison, diffusely currently shows 788 visits and Leonardo.ai shows 10.9M; Leonardo.ai has about 13,840.7 times the visible traffic of diffusely, an absolute difference of about 10.9M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
diffusely monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 1.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 741 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 1.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 3.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 3.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 788 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷France | 100% | 788 |
検索キーワード
Leonardo.ai monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 10.7M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 11.2M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 9.3M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 11.3M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 10.7M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 10.9M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 28.16% | 3.1M |
| 🇮🇳India | 25.92% | 2.8M |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 18.01% | 2M |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 17.49% | 1.9M |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 10.42% | 1.1M |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 83.85% | 9.1M |
| 参照元 | 14.41% | 1.6M |
| Eメール | 1.74% | 189.8K |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of diffusely and Leonardo.ai
diffusely Core features
Leonardo.ai Core features
Use cases
diffusely Use cases
Leonardo.ai Use cases
diffusely vs Leonardo.ai:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth diffusely vs Leonardo.ai comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. diffusely is primarily listed under “生成芸術”, while Leonardo.ai is primarily listed under “生成芸術”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (diffusely: Browser extension; Leonardo.ai: Website); Monthly visits (diffusely: 788; Leonardo.ai: 10.9M); Monthly growth (diffusely: -78.9%; Leonardo.ai: 1.7%); Favorites (diffusely: 112; Leonardo.ai: 115); Website (diffusely: diffusely.ai; Leonardo.ai: leonardo.ai). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the diffusely vs Leonardo.ai monthly traffic comparison, diffusely currently shows 788 visits and Leonardo.ai shows 10.9M; Leonardo.ai has about 13,840.7 times the visible traffic of diffusely, an absolute difference of about 10.9M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Leonardo.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
diffusely and Leonardo.ai currently overlap in shared categories: 生成芸術; shared tags: AIアート、コンセプトアート、画像生成、テキスト画像. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
diffusely's unique categories/tags are 画像編集、クリエイティブ自動化、生成塗りつぶし、グラフィックデザイン、インペインティング、アウトペインティング、写真編集、Photoshop プラグイン; Leonardo.ai's are 3D、画像生成、動画生成、3Dテクスチャリング、キャラクターデザイン、ゲームアセット、生成AI、ステーブルディフュージョン. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
diffusely has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 109 likes;Leonardo.ai has no verified rating, 0 comments, 115 favorites, and 112 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate diffusely first
Put diffusely on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “生成芸術” and especially 画像編集、クリエイティブ自動化、生成塗りつぶし、グラフィックデザイン、インペインティング、アウトペインティング. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
diffusely also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is browser extension, 788 verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Leonardo.ai first
Put Leonardo.ai on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “生成芸術” and especially 3D、画像生成、動画生成、3Dテクスチャリング、キャラクターデザイン、ゲームアセット. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Leonardo.ai also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 10.9M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in diffusely and Leonardo.ai, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




