DingTalk
経営 · 19.2M 月間訪問数
DingTalkは、AIを搭載したオールインワンの企業向けコラボレーションおよび管理プラットフォームです。インスタントメッセージング、ビデオ会議、プロジェクト管理、および完全なオフィススイートを統合し、インテリジェントアシスタント、自動会議要約、AIによるデータ分析などの高度なAI機能を提供します。あらゆる規模の企業向けに設計されており、ワークフローを合理化し、生産性を向上させ、人事から財務までの組織運営をデジタル化します。
製品概要
DingTalk 製品概要
DingTalkは、AIを搭載したオールインワンの企業向けコラボレーションおよび管理プラットフォームです。インスタントメッセージング、ビデオ会議、プロジェクト管理、および完全なオフィススイートを統合し、インテリジェントアシスタント、自動会議要約、AIによるデータ分析などの高度なAI機能を提供します。あらゆる規模の企業向けに設計されており、ワークフローを合理化し、生産性を向上させ、人事から財務までの組織運営をデジタル化します。
Preview
eboard 製品概要
eBoardは、さまざまなセクターの理事会の運営を合理化し、ガバナンスを強化し、エンゲージメントを促進するために設計された、オールインワンの安全な理事会管理プラットフォームです。コミュニケーション、ドキュメント、会議のワークフローを、単一の直感的なクラウドベースのソリューションに一元化します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | DingTalk | eboard |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 経営 | 経営 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-10 | 2025-08-14 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | 有料 |
| 公式サイト | www.dingtalk.com | eboard.cloud |
| 製品タイプ | アプリ | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 19.2M | 1.3K |
| 月間成長率 | -2.1% | 171.2% |
| お気に入り | 104 | 118 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic
Compare DingTalk and eboard by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
DingTalk monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
19.2M
平均滞在時間
7:44
訪問あたりページ数
5.02
直帰率
33.01%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 19.7M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 19.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 13.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 22.6M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 19.6M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 19.2M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳China | 94.5% | 18.2M |
| 🇺🇸United States | 2.35% | 451.4K |
| 🇭🇰Hong Kong | 1.68% | 322.7K |
| 🇸🇬Singapore | 0.91% | 174.8K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 0.56% | 107.6K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 89.67% | 17.2M |
| 参照元 | 10.1% | 1.9M |
| Eメール | 0.23% | 44.2K |
検索キーワード
dingding悟空钉钉钉钉文档钉钉网页版
eboard monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
1.3K
平均滞在時間
0:05
訪問あたりページ数
1.72
直帰率
36.45%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/7: 690 月間訪問数
- 2025/8: 0 月間訪問数
- 2025/9: 473 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 0 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 0 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 1.3K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 57.65% | 740 |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 27.52% | 353 |
| 🇰🇷Korea, Republic of | 14.83% | 190 |
検索キーワード
e boarde-boardeboarde-board memberwhat does e baord mean
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of DingTalk and eboard
DingTalk Core features
経営
コラボレーション
チームチャット
eboard Core features
経営
コラボレーション
データ保護
Use cases
DingTalk Use cases
AIアシスタント
アリババ
企業コミュニケーション
人事管理
ローコードプラットフォーム
オフィススイート
プロジェクト管理
チームコラボレーション
ビデオ会議
eboard Use cases
取締役会管理
取締役会ポータル
コラボレーション
企業統治
意思決定
ドキュメントセキュリティ
ガバナンス
会議管理
非営利
DingTalk vs eboard：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth DingTalk vs eboard comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. DingTalk is primarily listed under “経営”, while eboard is primarily listed under “経営”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (DingTalk: App; eboard: Website); Pricing (DingTalk: Freemium; eboard: Paid); Monthly visits (DingTalk: 19.2M; eboard: 1.3K); Monthly growth (DingTalk: -2.1%; eboard: 171.2%); Favorites (DingTalk: 104; eboard: 118). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
DingTalk and eboard currently overlap in shared categories: 経営、コラボレーション. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
DingTalk's unique categories/tags are チームチャット、AIアシスタント、アリババ、企業コミュニケーション、人事管理、ローコードプラットフォーム、オフィススイート、プロジェクト管理; eboard's are データ保護、取締役会管理、取締役会ポータル、コラボレーション、企業統治、意思決定、ドキュメントセキュリティ、ガバナンス. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
DingTalk has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 113 likes；eboard has no verified rating, 0 comments, 118 favorites, and 121 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate DingTalk first
Put DingTalk on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “経営” and especially チームチャット、AIアシスタント、アリババ、企業コミュニケーション、人事管理、ローコードプラットフォーム. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
DingTalk also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 19.2M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate eboard first
Put eboard on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “経営” and especially データ保護、取締役会管理、取締役会ポータル、コラボレーション、企業統治、意思決定. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
eboard also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in DingTalk and eboard, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between DingTalk and eboard?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.