FaceAppは、iOSおよびAndroid向けの主要なAI搭載写真・セルフィーエディターです。10億回以上ダウンロードされており、高度なニューラルネットワークを使用して超リアルな変換を提供します。老化、性別転換、メイク、ヘアスタイル、ビューティーレタッチなどのフィルターを簡単に適用できます。ソーシャルメディア向けの魅力的で共有しやすいコンテンツ作成や、純粋な楽しみに最適です。
製品概要
FaceApp 製品概要
FaceAppは、iOSおよびAndroid向けの主要なAI搭載写真・セルフィーエディターです。10億回以上ダウンロードされており、高度なニューラルネットワークを使用して超リアルな変換を提供します。老化、性別転換、メイク、ヘアスタイル、ビューティーレタッチなどのフィルターを簡単に適用できます。ソーシャルメディア向けの魅力的で共有しやすいコンテンツ作成や、純粋な楽しみに最適です。
Filterly 製品概要
Filterlyは、ワンタップで写真の見た目を変換できるAI搭載のモバイル写真編集アプリです。新しいヘアスタイルを試したり、年齢の変化を視覚化したり、さまざまなアーティスティック&レトロフィルターを適用して、最高の自分を明らかにしましょう。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | FaceApp | Filterly |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | エンターテイメント | アバター生成 |
| 追加日 | 2025-09-09 | 2025-08-11 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | faceapp.com | www.filterly.app |
| 製品タイプ | アプリ | アプリ |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 349.1K | 174.3K |
| 月間成長率 | -3.2% | -27.8% |
| お気に入り | 98 | 94 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
FaceApp vs Filterly monthly traffic
Compare FaceApp and Filterly by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the FaceApp vs Filterly monthly traffic comparison, FaceApp currently shows 349.1K visits and Filterly shows 174.3K; FaceApp has about 2 times the visible traffic of Filterly, an absolute difference of about 174.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
FaceApp monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 344.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 383.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 298.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 335.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 360.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 349.1K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 53.5% | 186.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 16.03% | 56K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 12.14% | 42.4K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 9.58% | 33.4K |
| 🇰🇭Cambodia | 8.75% | 30.6K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 92.13% | 321.7K |
| 参照元 | 7.87% | 27.5K |
検索キーワード
Filterly monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 445.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 670.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 819.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 699.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 241.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 174.3K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 43.87% | 76.5K |
| 🇺🇦Ukraine | 34.8% | 60.7K |
| 🇵🇱Poland | 9.88% | 17.2K |
| 🇫🇷France | 6.68% | 11.6K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 4.77% | 8.3K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 82.24% | 143.3K |
| 参照元 | 11.18% | 19.5K |
| Eメール | 6.58% | 11.5K |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of FaceApp and Filterly
FaceApp Core features
Filterly Core features
Use cases
FaceApp Use cases
Filterly Use cases
Best suited roles
FaceApp Best suited roles
Filterly Best suited roles
FaceApp vs Filterly:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth FaceApp vs Filterly comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. FaceApp is primarily listed under “エンターテイメント”, while Filterly is primarily listed under “アバター生成”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (FaceApp: エンターテイメント; Filterly: アバター生成); Monthly visits (FaceApp: 349.1K; Filterly: 174.3K); Monthly growth (FaceApp: -3.2%; Filterly: -27.8%); Favorites (FaceApp: 98; Filterly: 94); Website (FaceApp: faceapp.com; Filterly: www.filterly.app). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the FaceApp vs Filterly monthly traffic comparison, FaceApp currently shows 349.1K visits and Filterly shows 174.3K; FaceApp has about 2 times the visible traffic of Filterly, an absolute difference of about 174.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate FaceApp first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
FaceApp and Filterly currently overlap in shared categories: コンテンツ作成; shared tags: AIフィルター、モバイルアプリ、写真編集、セルフィーエディター、ソーシャルメディア. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
FaceApp's unique categories/tags are エンターテイメント、写真編集、年齢フィルター、ビューティーフィルター、性別変換、写真レタッチ、人物補正; Filterly's are アバター生成、写真フィルター、年齢進行、アバター作成、顔交換、ヘアスタイルチェンジャー、画像変換. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
FaceApp has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 119 likes;Filterly has no verified rating, 0 comments, 94 favorites, and 90 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate FaceApp first
Put FaceApp on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “エンターテイメント” and especially エンターテイメント、写真編集、年齢フィルター、ビューティーフィルター、性別変換、写真レタッチ, or the users include コンテンツクリエイター、デジタルマーケター、グラフィックデザイナー、インフルエンサー. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
FaceApp also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 349.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Filterly first
Put Filterly on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “アバター生成” and especially アバター生成、写真フィルター、年齢進行、アバター作成、顔交換、ヘアスタイルチェンジャー. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Filterly also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 174.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in FaceApp and Filterly, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between FaceApp and Filterly?
Where does this comparison data come from?
What do unknown fields mean?
スポンサー
Discover more tools in the same category.





