Fooocus
デジタルアート · 226.1K 月間訪問数
Fooocusは、Stable Diffusionによる高品質な画像生成プロセスを簡素化する、無料のオープンソースAI画像生成ツールです。インペインティング、スタイル制御、顔交換などの強力な機能と使いやすさを両立し、初心者から上級者まで幅広く利用できます。
VS
Midjourney
デジタルアート · 10.7M 月間訪問数
Midjourneyは、簡単なテキストプロンプトから、高品質で芸術的なビジュアルを生成する強力なAI画像生成ツールです。主にDiscordを介して操作し、そのユニークな美的感覚、高度なカスタマイズオプション、活発なクリエイティブコミュニティで知られ、アーティスト、デザイナー、クリエイターにとって最高の選択肢となっています。
製品概要
Fooocus 製品概要
Fooocusは、Stable Diffusionによる高品質な画像生成プロセスを簡素化する、無料のオープンソースAI画像生成ツールです。インペインティング、スタイル制御、顔交換などの強力な機能と使いやすさを両立し、初心者から上級者まで幅広く利用できます。
Preview
Midjourney 製品概要
Midjourneyは、簡単なテキストプロンプトから、高品質で芸術的なビジュアルを生成する強力なAI画像生成ツールです。主にDiscordを介して操作し、そのユニークな美的感覚、高度なカスタマイズオプション、活発なクリエイティブコミュニティで知られ、アーティスト、デザイナー、クリエイターにとって最高の選択肢となっています。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Fooocus | Midjourney |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | デジタルアート | デジタルアート |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-02 | 2025-08-06 |
| 価格 | 無料 | 有料 |
| 公式サイト | fooocus.one | www.midjourney.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 226.1K | 10.7M |
| 月間成長率 | 11.3% | -10.8% |
| お気に入り | 99 | 131 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Fooocus vs Midjourney monthly traffic
Compare Fooocus and Midjourney by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Fooocus vs Midjourney monthly traffic comparison, Fooocus currently shows 226.1K visits and Midjourney shows 10.7M; Midjourney has about 47.4 times the visible traffic of Fooocus, an absolute difference of about 10.5M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Fooocus is registered at the fooocus.one/zh-TW subpage; Midjourney is registered at the www.midjourney.com/home subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Fooocus monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
226.1K
平均滞在時間
0:49
訪問あたりページ数
2.52
直帰率
39.38%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 288.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 237.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 255K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 203.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 226.1K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 24.8% | 56.1K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 23.62% | 53.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 21.26% | 48.1K |
| 🇪🇸Spain | 17.28% | 39.1K |
| 🇯🇵Japan | 13.04% | 29.5K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 77.15% | 174.4K |
| 参照元 | 22.85% | 51.7K |
検索キーワード
foocusfooocusfooocus aifooocus colabfooocus github
Midjourney monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
10.7M
平均滞在時間
9:10
訪問あたりページ数
26.16
直帰率
28.29%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 15M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 12.8M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 13.6M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 12M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 10.7M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 49.15% | 5.3M |
| 🇰🇷Korea, Republic of | 18.67% | 2M |
| 🇨🇳China | 13.29% | 1.4M |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 9.51% | 1M |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 9.38% | 1M |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 90.46% | 9.7M |
| 参照元 | 8.3% | 888.5K |
| Eメール | 1.24% | 132.7K |
検索キーワード
미드저니mid journeymidjourneymidjourney aimidjourney free
Traffic-based selection guidance: Midjourney is registered under a www.midjourney.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Midjourney for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Fooocus and Midjourney
Fooocus Core features
デジタルアート
グラフィックデザイン
画像生成
Midjourney Core features
デジタルアート
グラフィックデザイン
画像生成
Use cases
Fooocus Use cases
AIアート
画像生成
テキスト画像
顔交換
無料AIツール
画像編集
インペインティング
オープンソース
SDXL
ステーブルディフュージョン
Midjourney Use cases
AIアート
画像生成
テキスト画像
コンセプトアート
デザインツール
デジタルアート
Discordボット
イラストレーション
フォトリアリズム
Fooocus vs Midjourney：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Fooocus vs Midjourney comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fooocus is primarily listed under “デジタルアート”, while Midjourney is primarily listed under “デジタルアート”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Fooocus: Free; Midjourney: Paid); Monthly visits (Fooocus: 226.1K; Midjourney: 10.7M); Monthly growth (Fooocus: 11.3%; Midjourney: -10.8%); Favorites (Fooocus: 99; Midjourney: 131); Website (Fooocus: fooocus.one; Midjourney: www.midjourney.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Fooocus vs Midjourney monthly traffic comparison, Fooocus currently shows 226.1K visits and Midjourney shows 10.7M; Midjourney has about 47.4 times the visible traffic of Fooocus, an absolute difference of about 10.5M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Fooocus is registered at the fooocus.one/zh-TW subpage; Midjourney is registered at the www.midjourney.com/home subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Midjourney is registered under a www.midjourney.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Midjourney for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Fooocus and Midjourney currently overlap in shared categories: デジタルアート、グラフィックデザイン、画像生成; shared tags: AIアート、画像生成、テキスト画像. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Fooocus's unique categories/tags are 顔交換、無料AIツール、画像編集、インペインティング、オープンソース、SDXL、ステーブルディフュージョン; Midjourney's are コンセプトアート、デザインツール、デジタルアート、Discordボット、イラストレーション、フォトリアリズム. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Fooocus has no verified rating, 0 comments, 99 favorites, and 104 likes；Midjourney has no verified rating, 0 comments, 131 favorites, and 112 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Fooocus first
Put Fooocus on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “デジタルアート” and especially 顔交換、無料AIツール、画像編集、インペインティング、オープンソース、SDXL. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Fooocus also currently records: pricing is free, product type is website, 226.1K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Midjourney first
Put Midjourney on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “デジタルアート” and especially コンセプトアート、デザインツール、デジタルアート、Discordボット、イラストレーション、フォトリアリズム. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Midjourney also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 10.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fooocus and Midjourney, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Fooocus and Midjourney?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.