GhostSnap
Image Tools · 3.7K 月間訪問数
GhostSnapはmacOSの生産性ツールであり、スクリーンショットのワークフローを革新します。複数のスクリーンショットを連続して撮影し、1回の操作ですべて貼り付けることを可能にします。画像を自動で最大80%圧縮し、AIツールのトークン消費を節約します。オンデバイスのOCRテキスト抽出と画像アノテーション機能も備えています。
製品概要
GhostSnap 製品概要
GhostSnapはmacOSの生産性ツールであり、スクリーンショットのワークフローを革新します。複数のスクリーンショットを連続して撮影し、1回の操作ですべて貼り付けることを可能にします。画像を自動で最大80%圧縮し、AIツールのトークン消費を節約します。オンデバイスのOCRテキスト抽出と画像アノテーション機能も備えています。
Preview
Screenity 製品概要
Screenityは、強力で無料、プライバシーを重視したChrome向けの画面・カメラレコーダーです。ユーザーデータを一切収集せず、無制限の録画、注釈ツール、基本的な動画編集機能を提供します。チュートリアル、デモ、プレゼンテーションの作成に最適です。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | GhostSnap | Screenity |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | Image Tools | バグレポート |
| 追加日 | 2026-05-22 | 2025-09-10 |
| 価格 | 有料 | 無料 |
| 公式サイト | ghostsnap.app | screenity.io |
| 製品タイプ | アプリ | ブラウザ拡張 |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 3.7K | 43.8K |
| 月間成長率 | 未確認 | -1.6% |
| お気に入り | 5 | 111 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
GhostSnap vs Screenity monthly traffic
Compare GhostSnap and Screenity by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the GhostSnap vs Screenity monthly traffic comparison, GhostSnap currently shows 3.7K visits and Screenity shows 43.8K; Screenity has about 12 times the visible traffic of GhostSnap, an absolute difference of about 40.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Screenity has complete third-party traffic details; GhostSnap uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
GhostSnap monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
3.7K
Screenity monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
43.8K
平均滞在時間
1:54
訪問あたりページ数
2.65
直帰率
40.47%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 45.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 31.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 34.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 47K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 44.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 43.8K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 46.14% | 20.2K |
| 🇮🇳India | 21.26% | 9.3K |
| 🇫🇷France | 12.83% | 5.6K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 10.03% | 4.4K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 9.74% | 4.3K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 81.8% | 35.9K |
| 参照元 | 18.2% | 8K |
検索キーワード
record browser with censored partsscreemityscreenityscreen recorder-chromescreensity github
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of GhostSnap and Screenity
GhostSnap Core features
Image Tools
Annotation
OCR
Screenity Core features
バグレポート
チュートリアル作成
動画作成
画面録画
Use cases
GhostSnap Use cases
アノテーション
スクリーンショット
batch
クリップボード
compression
macOS
OCR
生産性
Screenity Use cases
アノテーション
スクリーンショット
Chrome拡張機能
無料ツール
オープンソース
プライバシー
画面録画
チュートリアルメーカー
映像編集
ビデオ録画
Best suited roles
GhostSnap Best suited roles
コンテンツクリエイター
カスタマーサポート
ソフトウェア開発者
UI/UXデザイナー
デジタルマーケター
グラフィックデザイナー
研究者
Screenity Best suited roles
コンテンツクリエイター
カスタマーサポート
ソフトウェア開発者
UI/UXデザイナー
教育者
マーケティングマネージャー
プロダクトマネージャー
QAテスター
営業担当者
GhostSnap vs Screenity：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth GhostSnap vs Screenity comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. GhostSnap is primarily listed under “Image Tools”, while Screenity is primarily listed under “バグレポート”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (GhostSnap: Image Tools; Screenity: バグレポート); Product type (GhostSnap: App; Screenity: Browser extension); Pricing (GhostSnap: Paid; Screenity: Free); Monthly visits (GhostSnap: 3.7K; Screenity: 43.8K); Favorites (GhostSnap: 5; Screenity: 111). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the GhostSnap vs Screenity monthly traffic comparison, GhostSnap currently shows 3.7K visits and Screenity shows 43.8K; Screenity has about 12 times the visible traffic of GhostSnap, an absolute difference of about 40.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Screenity has complete third-party traffic details; GhostSnap uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
GhostSnap and Screenity currently overlap in shared tags: アノテーション、スクリーンショット; shared roles: コンテンツクリエイター、カスタマーサポート、ソフトウェア開発者、UI/UXデザイナー. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
GhostSnap's unique categories/tags are Image Tools、Annotation、OCR、batch、クリップボード、compression、macOS、生産性; Screenity's are バグレポート、チュートリアル作成、動画作成、画面録画、Chrome拡張機能、無料ツール、オープンソース、プライバシー. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
GhostSnap has no verified rating, 0 comments, 5 favorites, and 2 likes；Screenity has no verified rating, 0 comments, 111 favorites, and 110 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate GhostSnap first
Put GhostSnap on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Image Tools” and especially Image Tools、Annotation、OCR、batch、クリップボード、compression, or the users include デジタルマーケター、グラフィックデザイナー、研究者. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
GhostSnap also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is app, 3.7K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Screenity first
Put Screenity on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “バグレポート” and especially バグレポート、チュートリアル作成、動画作成、画面録画、Chrome拡張機能、無料ツール, or the users include 教育者、マーケティングマネージャー、プロダクトマネージャー、QAテスター. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Screenity also currently records: pricing is free, product type is browser extension, 43.8K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in GhostSnap and Screenity, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between GhostSnap and Screenity?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.
スポンサー
Discover more tools in the same category.
