GreenNodeは、スタートアップや企業向けに高性能なNVIDIA GPUソリューションを提供するワンストップのAIクラウドインフラプロバイダーです。H100 GPUなどの最先端リソースへの即時アクセス、スケーラブルなインフラ、専門的なAIラボのサポートを提供します。コスト効率とパフォーマンスに重点を置き、モデルのトレーニング、ファインチューニング、推論を加速させ、東南アジアで強力な存在感を示しています。
Vast.aiは、AIおよび機械学習ワークロード向けに広大なGPUネットワークへのオンデマンドアクセスを提供する、主要なGPUクラウドプラットフォームです。透明性の高い従量課金制のマーケットプレイスを通じて、従来のクラウドプロバイダーよりも最大80%安いコストで、開発者や企業に高性能コンピューティングを提供します。
製品概要
GreenNode 製品概要
GreenNodeは、スタートアップや企業向けに高性能なNVIDIA GPUソリューションを提供するワンストップのAIクラウドインフラプロバイダーです。H100 GPUなどの最先端リソースへの即時アクセス、スケーラブルなインフラ、専門的なAIラボのサポートを提供します。コスト効率とパフォーマンスに重点を置き、モデルのトレーニング、ファインチューニング、推論を加速させ、東南アジアで強力な存在感を示しています。
Vast.ai 製品概要
Vast.aiは、AIおよび機械学習ワークロード向けに広大なGPUネットワークへのオンデマンドアクセスを提供する、主要なGPUクラウドプラットフォームです。透明性の高い従量課金制のマーケットプレイスを通じて、従来のクラウドプロバイダーよりも最大80%安いコストで、開発者や企業に高性能コンピューティングを提供します。
Detailed feature comparison
GreenNode vs Vast.ai monthly traffic
Compare GreenNode and Vast.ai by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the GreenNode vs Vast.ai monthly traffic comparison, GreenNode currently shows 18.1K visits and Vast.ai shows 1.4M; Vast.ai has about 75.1 times the visible traffic of GreenNode, an absolute difference of about 1.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
GreenNode monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 6.2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 15.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 11.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 22.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 18.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 18.1K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 44.55% | 8.1K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 31.46% | 5.7K |
| 🇮🇳India | 11.16% | 2K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 7.2% | 1.3K |
| 🇸🇬Singapore | 5.63% | 1K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 99.21% | 18K |
| 参照元 | 0.79% | 143 |
検索キーワード
Vast.ai monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 870.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 943.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 1.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1.2M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 1.2M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 1.4M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 38.98% | 530.3K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 17.55% | 238.7K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 16.16% | 219.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 14.03% | 190.9K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 13.28% | 180.7K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 96.48% | 1.3M |
| 参照元 | 2.61% | 35.5K |
| Eメール | 0.91% | 12.4K |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of GreenNode and Vast.ai
GreenNode Core features
Vast.ai Core features
Use cases
GreenNode Use cases
Vast.ai Use cases
GreenNode vs Vast.ai:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth GreenNode vs Vast.ai comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. GreenNode is primarily listed under “モデルトレーニング”, while Vast.ai is primarily listed under “GPUレンタル”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (GreenNode: モデルトレーニング; Vast.ai: GPUレンタル); Monthly visits (GreenNode: 18.1K; Vast.ai: 1.4M); Monthly growth (GreenNode: -2.6%; Vast.ai: 17.1%); Favorites (GreenNode: 93; Vast.ai: 109); Website (GreenNode: greennode.ai; Vast.ai: vast.ai). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the GreenNode vs Vast.ai monthly traffic comparison, GreenNode currently shows 18.1K visits and Vast.ai shows 1.4M; Vast.ai has about 75.1 times the visible traffic of GreenNode, an absolute difference of about 1.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Vast.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
GreenNode and Vast.ai currently overlap in shared categories: クラウドコンピューティング; shared tags: AIインフラ、クラウドコンピューティング、ディープラーニング、推論、機械学習、モデル学習. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
GreenNode's unique categories/tags are モデルトレーニング、GPUレンタル、AIスタートアップ、分散学習、GPUクラウド、HPC、大規模言語モデル、NVIDIA H100; Vast.ai's are GPUレンタル、API、費用対効果の高いGPU、開発者ツール、スケーラブルコンピューティング. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
GreenNode has no verified rating, 0 comments, 93 favorites, and 114 likes;Vast.ai has no verified rating, 0 comments, 109 favorites, and 106 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate GreenNode first
Put GreenNode on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “モデルトレーニング” and especially モデルトレーニング、GPUレンタル、AIスタートアップ、分散学習、GPUクラウド、HPC. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
GreenNode also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 18.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Vast.ai first
Put Vast.ai on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “GPUレンタル” and especially GPUレンタル、API、費用対効果の高いGPU、開発者ツール、スケーラブルコンピューティング. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Vast.ai also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in GreenNode and Vast.ai, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




