monday.com
CRM · 35.4M 月間訪問数
monday.comは、仕事のあらゆる側面を単一の共同プラットフォームに統合する包括的なワークOS（Work Operating System）です。AIを活用してタスクを自動化し、ワークフローを合理化し、プロジェクト管理、営業、マーケティング、ITなどのチームにデータ駆動型のインサイトを提供し、生産性と可視性を向上させます。
製品概要
monday.com 製品概要
monday.comは、仕事のあらゆる側面を単一の共同プラットフォームに統合する包括的なワークOS（Work Operating System）です。AIを活用してタスクを自動化し、ワークフローを合理化し、プロジェクト管理、営業、マーケティング、ITなどのチームにデータ駆動型のインサイトを提供し、生産性と可視性を向上させます。
Preview
Stacker 製品概要
Stackerは、AirtableやGoogle Sheetsのデータから直接、CRM、社内ツール、顧客ポータルなどのカスタムビジネスアプリケーションを構築できるノーコードプラットフォームです。一行のコードも書かずに、独自のワークフローに完璧にフィットするソフトウェアをチームに提供します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | monday.com | Stacker |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | CRM | CRM |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-07 | 2025-08-08 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | monday.com | stackerhq.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 35.4M | 93.4K |
| 月間成長率 | -3.7% | 9.2% |
| お気に入り | 123 | 115 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
monday.com vs Stacker monthly traffic
Compare monday.com and Stacker by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the monday.com vs Stacker monthly traffic comparison, monday.com currently shows 35.4M visits and Stacker shows 93.4K; monday.com has about 378.9 times the visible traffic of Stacker, an absolute difference of about 35.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
monday.com monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
35.4M
平均滞在時間
9:16
訪問あたりページ数
7
直帰率
32.6%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 40.2M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 39M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 36.5M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 39.3M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 36.7M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 35.4M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 62.28% | 22M |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 10.95% | 3.9M |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 10.28% | 3.6M |
| 🇦🇺Australia | 9.37% | 3.3M |
| 🇵🇭Philippines | 7.12% | 2.5M |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 88.42% | 31.3M |
| Eメール | 6.79% | 2.4M |
| 参照元 | 4.79% | 1.7M |
検索キーワード
airtableasanaclickupmondaymonday com
Stacker monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
93.4K
平均滞在時間
3:34
訪問あたりページ数
5.83
直帰率
35.83%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 144.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 97.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 83.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 110.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 85.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 93.4K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 47.39% | 44.2K |
| 🇪🇬Egypt | 33.77% | 31.5K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 10.69% | 10K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 4.77% | 4.5K |
| 🇻🇪Venezuela | 3.38% | 3.2K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 86.33% | 80.6K |
| 参照元 | 9.9% | 9.2K |
| Eメール | 3.77% | 3.5K |
検索キーワード
flixrstackerstacker ai agentsstackerhqstackerhq login
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate monday.com first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of monday.com and Stacker
monday.com Core features
CRM
プロジェクト管理
マーケティングオートメーション
タスク管理
Stacker Core features
CRM
プロジェクト管理
データベース
ノーコードプラットフォーム
Use cases
monday.com Use cases
CRM
ノーコード
ワークフロー自動化
アジャイル開発
データ視覚化
マーケティング管理
プロジェクト管理
営業パイプライン
タスク管理
チームコラボレーション
ワークOS
Stacker Use cases
CRM
ノーコード
ワークフロー自動化
エアテーブル
アプリビルダー
ビジネスアプリケーション
顧客ポータル
データベース
社内ツール
monday.com vs Stacker：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth monday.com vs Stacker comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. monday.com is primarily listed under “CRM”, while Stacker is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (monday.com: 35.4M; Stacker: 93.4K); Monthly growth (monday.com: -3.7%; Stacker: 9.2%); Favorites (monday.com: 123; Stacker: 115); Website (monday.com: monday.com; Stacker: stackerhq.com); Added (monday.com: 2025-08-07; Stacker: 2025-08-08). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the monday.com vs Stacker monthly traffic comparison, monday.com currently shows 35.4M visits and Stacker shows 93.4K; monday.com has about 378.9 times the visible traffic of Stacker, an absolute difference of about 35.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate monday.com first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
monday.com and Stacker currently overlap in shared categories: CRM、プロジェクト管理; shared tags: CRM、ノーコード、ワークフロー自動化. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
monday.com's unique categories/tags are マーケティングオートメーション、タスク管理、アジャイル開発、データ視覚化、マーケティング管理、プロジェクト管理、営業パイプライン、チームコラボレーション; Stacker's are データベース、ノーコードプラットフォーム、エアテーブル、アプリビルダー、ビジネスアプリケーション、顧客ポータル、社内ツール. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
monday.com has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 123 likes；Stacker has no verified rating, 0 comments, 115 favorites, and 116 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate monday.com first
Put monday.com on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially マーケティングオートメーション、タスク管理、アジャイル開発、データ視覚化、マーケティング管理、プロジェクト管理. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
monday.com also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 35.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Stacker first
Put Stacker on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially データベース、ノーコードプラットフォーム、エアテーブル、アプリビルダー、ビジネスアプリケーション、顧客ポータル. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Stacker also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 93.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in monday.com and Stacker, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between monday.com and Stacker?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.