OpenMemory MCPは、AIツールに永続的でプライベートなメモリを提供するローカルファーストのアプリケーションです。インタラクション、好み、コンテキストをデバイスに安全に保存、整理、管理し、ClaudeやCursorなどの異なるAIプラットフォーム間でパーソナライズされた継続的な対話を可能にします。
supermemoryは、AI時代のためのメモリAPIおよびインフラストラクチャであり、開発者が長期的で永続的なメモリを持つLLMを構築するために設計されています。有限なコンテキストウィンドウの制限を克服し、過去の対話や情報を様々なプラットフォームで記憶する、インテリジェントで文脈を認識するAIエージェント、チャットボット、アプリケーションの作成を可能にします。
製品概要
OpenMemory MCP 製品概要
OpenMemory MCPは、AIツールに永続的でプライベートなメモリを提供するローカルファーストのアプリケーションです。インタラクション、好み、コンテキストをデバイスに安全に保存、整理、管理し、ClaudeやCursorなどの異なるAIプラットフォーム間でパーソナライズされた継続的な対話を可能にします。
supermemory 製品概要
supermemoryは、AI時代のためのメモリAPIおよびインフラストラクチャであり、開発者が長期的で永続的なメモリを持つLLMを構築するために設計されています。有限なコンテキストウィンドウの制限を克服し、過去の対話や情報を様々なプラットフォームで記憶する、インテリジェントで文脈を認識するAIエージェント、チャットボット、アプリケーションの作成を可能にします。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | OpenMemory MCP | supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | コーディングアシスタント | LLM |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-15 | 2025-08-16 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | mem0.ai | supermemory.ai |
| 製品タイプ | アプリ | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 388.8K | 174.2K |
| 月間成長率 | 14.5% | -28.8% |
| お気に入り | 137 | 122 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
OpenMemory MCP vs supermemory monthly traffic
Compare OpenMemory MCP and supermemory by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the OpenMemory MCP vs supermemory monthly traffic comparison, OpenMemory MCP currently shows 388.8K visits and supermemory shows 174.2K; OpenMemory MCP has about 2.2 times the visible traffic of supermemory, an absolute difference of about 214.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
OpenMemory MCP is registered at the mem0.ai/openmemory-mcp subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
OpenMemory MCP monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 247.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 275.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 362.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 339.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 388.8K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 44.61% | 173.4K |
| 🇨🇳China | 23.09% | 89.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 16.87% | 65.6K |
| 🇭🇰Hong Kong | 10.56% | 41.1K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 4.87% | 18.9K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 78.15% | 303.8K |
| 参照元 | 19.83% | 77.1K |
| Eメール | 2.02% | 7.9K |
検索キーワード
supermemory monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 68.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 140.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 216.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 242.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 244.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 174.2K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 56.33% | 98.1K |
| 🇮🇳India | 22.09% | 38.5K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 8.47% | 14.8K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.67% | 11.6K |
| 🇹🇭Thailand | 6.44% | 11.2K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 84.44% | 147.1K |
| 参照元 | 14.32% | 24.9K |
| Eメール | 1.24% | 2.2K |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of OpenMemory MCP and supermemory
OpenMemory MCP Core features
supermemory Core features
Use cases
OpenMemory MCP Use cases
supermemory Use cases
OpenMemory MCP vs supermemory:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth OpenMemory MCP vs supermemory comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. OpenMemory MCP is primarily listed under “コーディングアシスタント”, while supermemory is primarily listed under “LLM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (OpenMemory MCP: コーディングアシスタント; supermemory: LLM); Product type (OpenMemory MCP: App; supermemory: Website); Monthly visits (OpenMemory MCP: 388.8K; supermemory: 174.2K); Monthly growth (OpenMemory MCP: 14.5%; supermemory: -28.8%); Favorites (OpenMemory MCP: 137; supermemory: 122). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the OpenMemory MCP vs supermemory monthly traffic comparison, OpenMemory MCP currently shows 388.8K visits and supermemory shows 174.2K; OpenMemory MCP has about 2.2 times the visible traffic of supermemory, an absolute difference of about 214.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
OpenMemory MCP is registered at the mem0.ai/openmemory-mcp subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
OpenMemory MCP is registered under a mem0.ai subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing OpenMemory MCP for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
OpenMemory MCP and supermemory currently overlap in shared categories: 知識管理; shared tags: コンテキスト管理、開発者ツール、大規模言語モデル. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
OpenMemory MCP's unique categories/tags are コーディングアシスタント、データ制御、相互運用性、知識ベース、ローカルファースト、記憶、パーソナルAI、プライバシー; supermemory's are LLM、APIと統合、AIエージェント、API、チャットボット、知識管理、長期記憶、メモリAPI. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
OpenMemory MCP has no verified rating, 0 comments, 137 favorites, and 143 likes;supermemory has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 100 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate OpenMemory MCP first
Put OpenMemory MCP on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “コーディングアシスタント” and especially コーディングアシスタント、データ制御、相互運用性、知識ベース、ローカルファースト、記憶. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
OpenMemory MCP also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 388.8K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate supermemory first
Put supermemory on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “LLM” and especially LLM、APIと統合、AIエージェント、API、チャットボット、知識管理. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
supermemory also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 174.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in OpenMemory MCP and supermemory, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




