Pin
採用 · 163.4K 月間訪問数
Pinは、採用プロセスを革新するために設計されたAI搭載の採用プラットフォームです。8億5000万以上のプロフィールから候補者を自動的にソーシングし、博士レベルの精度で履歴書をスクリーニングし、マルチチャネルのアウトリーチでトップ候補者とエンゲージし、面接のスケジュール調整を効率化して、チームがトップタレントをより速く、より効率的に採用できるよう支援します。
製品概要
Pin 製品概要
Pinは、採用プロセスを革新するために設計されたAI搭載の採用プラットフォームです。8億5000万以上のプロフィールから候補者を自動的にソーシングし、博士レベルの精度で履歴書をスクリーニングし、マルチチャネルのアウトリーチでトップ候補者とエンゲージし、面接のスケジュール調整を効率化して、チームがトップタレントをより速く、より効率的に採用できるよう支援します。
Preview
TopDev 製品概要
TopDevは、開発者のGitHubプロフィールを分析することで、企業がトップクラスの開発者を採用するのを支援するAI搭載の採用プラットフォームです。技術スキル、信頼性、一貫性を評価して深い洞察を提供し、採用プロセスを合理化し、人事チームやスタートアップの大幅な時間節約を実現します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Pin | TopDev |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 採用 | コード分析 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-06 | 2025-08-11 |
| 価格 | 有料 | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | www.pin.com | www.topdev.online |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 163.4K | 3.5K |
| 月間成長率 | 55.1% | 未確認 |
| お気に入り | 103 | 98 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Pin vs TopDev monthly traffic
Compare Pin and TopDev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Pin vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Pin currently shows 163.4K visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Pin has about 47.1 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 159.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Pin has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Pin monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
163.4K
平均滞在時間
7:19
訪問あたりページ数
7.97
直帰率
28.07%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 47.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 65.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 49.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 63.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 105.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 163.4K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 94.65% | 154.6K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 2.92% | 4.8K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 0.94% | 1.5K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 0.76% | 1.2K |
| 🇮🇳India | 0.73% | 1.2K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 86.65% | 141.6K |
| Eメール | 10.44% | 17.1K |
| 参照元 | 2.91% | 4.8K |
検索キーワード
pinpin aipin recruitingpin recruiting toolpin recruitment
TopDev monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
3.5K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Pin and TopDev
Pin Core features
採用
自動化
アウトリーチ
TopDev Core features
採用
コード分析
タレントソーシング
Use cases
Pin Use cases
候補者ソーシング
採用
HRテック
採用管理システム
ATS
自動化
採用自動化
履歴書スクリーニング
人材獲得
TopDev Use cases
候補者ソーシング
採用
HRテック
AI採用
開発者採用
GitHub 分析
タレントソーシング
技術審査
Pin vs TopDev：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Pin vs TopDev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Pin is primarily listed under “採用”, while TopDev is primarily listed under “コード分析”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Pin: 採用; TopDev: コード分析); Pricing (Pin: Paid; TopDev: Freemium); Monthly visits (Pin: 163.4K; TopDev: 3.5K); Favorites (Pin: 103; TopDev: 98); Website (Pin: www.pin.com; TopDev: www.topdev.online). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Pin vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Pin currently shows 163.4K visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Pin has about 47.1 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 159.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Pin has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Pin and TopDev currently overlap in shared categories: 採用; shared tags: 候補者ソーシング、採用、HRテック. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Pin's unique categories/tags are 自動化、アウトリーチ、採用管理システム、ATS、採用自動化、採用、履歴書スクリーニング、人材獲得; TopDev's are コード分析、タレントソーシング、AI採用、開発者採用、GitHub 分析、技術審査. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Pin has no verified rating, 0 comments, 103 favorites, and 107 likes；TopDev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 106 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Pin first
Put Pin on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “採用” and especially 自動化、アウトリーチ、採用管理システム、ATS、採用自動化、採用. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Pin also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 163.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate TopDev first
Put TopDev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “コード分析” and especially コード分析、タレントソーシング、AI採用、開発者採用、GitHub 分析、技術審査. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
TopDev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Pin and TopDev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Pin and TopDev?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.