Pipefy
ノーコードプラットフォーム · 2.6M 月間訪問数
Pipefyは、AI駆動のローコードプロセス自動化プラットフォームで、技術的な専門知識なしにチームがワークフローを構築、管理、拡張できるようにします。自律的なAIエージェントを使用してタスクを自動化し、運用を一元化し、既存のシステムと統合して、効率を高め、エラーを減らし、人事、財務、調達などの部門全体のビジネス成長を加速させます。
VS
Process.app
プロセス管理 · 3.4K 月間訪問数
Process.appは、AIを搭載したビジネスプロセス管理（BPM）およびワークフロー自動化プラットフォームです。インテリジェントな提案と強力な自動化により、チームがビジネスプロセスとワークフローを設計、実行、分析、最適化し、生産性と効率を向上させることを可能にします。
製品概要
Pipefy 製品概要
Pipefyは、AI駆動のローコードプロセス自動化プラットフォームで、技術的な専門知識なしにチームがワークフローを構築、管理、拡張できるようにします。自律的なAIエージェントを使用してタスクを自動化し、運用を一元化し、既存のシステムと統合して、効率を高め、エラーを減らし、人事、財務、調達などの部門全体のビジネス成長を加速させます。
Preview
Process.app 製品概要
Process.appは、AIを搭載したビジネスプロセス管理（BPM）およびワークフロー自動化プラットフォームです。インテリジェントな提案と強力な自動化により、チームがビジネスプロセスとワークフローを設計、実行、分析、最適化し、生産性と効率を向上させることを可能にします。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Pipefy | Process.app |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | ノーコードプラットフォーム | プロセス管理 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-05 | 2025-08-02 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | www.pipefy.com | process.app |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 2.6M | 3.4K |
| 月間成長率 | 7.4% | 未確認 |
| お気に入り | 90 | 133 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Pipefy vs Process.app monthly traffic
Compare Pipefy and Process.app by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Pipefy vs Process.app monthly traffic comparison, Pipefy currently shows 2.6M visits and Process.app shows 3.4K; Pipefy has about 781.5 times the visible traffic of Process.app, an absolute difference of about 2.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Pipefy has complete third-party traffic details; Process.app uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Pipefy monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
2.6M
平均滞在時間
7:54
訪問あたりページ数
7.1
直帰率
47.18%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 2.6M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 2.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 2.3M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 2.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 2.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 2.6M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 95.7% | 2.5M |
| 🇿🇦South Africa | 1.63% | 42.9K |
| 🇵🇭Philippines | 1.08% | 28.4K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 0.92% | 24.2K |
| 🇨🇴Colombia | 0.67% | 17.6K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 79.81% | 2.1M |
| Eメール | 13.77% | 362.2K |
| 参照元 | 6.42% | 168.9K |
検索キーワード
n8npipedrivepipefytexto longo pipefyutmify
Process.app monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
3.4K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Pipefy and Process.app
Pipefy Core features
プロセス管理
ワークフロー自動化
ノーコードプラットフォーム
リスク管理
採用
Process.app Core features
プロセス管理
ワークフロー自動化
タスク管理
Use cases
Pipefy Use cases
BPM
ノーコード
AIエージェント
ビジネスプロセス管理
財務自動化
人事自動化
統合
ローコード
プロセス自動化
調達
ワークフロー管理
Process.app Use cases
BPM
ノーコード
自動化
ビジネスインテリジェンス
コラボレーション
プロセス管理
生産性
タスク管理
ワークフロー自動化
Pipefy vs Process.app：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Pipefy vs Process.app comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Pipefy is primarily listed under “ノーコードプラットフォーム”, while Process.app is primarily listed under “プロセス管理”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Pipefy: ノーコードプラットフォーム; Process.app: プロセス管理); Monthly visits (Pipefy: 2.6M; Process.app: 3.4K); Favorites (Pipefy: 90; Process.app: 133); Website (Pipefy: www.pipefy.com; Process.app: process.app); Added (Pipefy: 2025-08-05; Process.app: 2025-08-02). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Pipefy vs Process.app monthly traffic comparison, Pipefy currently shows 2.6M visits and Process.app shows 3.4K; Pipefy has about 781.5 times the visible traffic of Process.app, an absolute difference of about 2.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Pipefy has complete third-party traffic details; Process.app uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Pipefy and Process.app currently overlap in shared categories: プロセス管理、ワークフロー自動化; shared tags: BPM、ノーコード. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Pipefy's unique categories/tags are ノーコードプラットフォーム、リスク管理、採用、AIエージェント、ビジネスプロセス管理、財務自動化、人事自動化、統合; Process.app's are タスク管理、自動化、ビジネスインテリジェンス、コラボレーション、プロセス管理、生産性、ワークフロー自動化. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Pipefy has no verified rating, 0 comments, 90 favorites, and 87 likes；Process.app has no verified rating, 0 comments, 133 favorites, and 132 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Pipefy first
Put Pipefy on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “ノーコードプラットフォーム” and especially ノーコードプラットフォーム、リスク管理、採用、AIエージェント、ビジネスプロセス管理、財務自動化. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Pipefy also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 2.6M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Process.app first
Put Process.app on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “プロセス管理” and especially タスク管理、自動化、ビジネスインテリジェンス、コラボレーション、プロセス管理、生産性. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Process.app also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Pipefy and Process.app, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Pipefy and Process.app?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.