QuickMagic
モーションキャプチャ · 144.3K 月間訪問数
QuickMagicは、単一カメラのビデオを高品質な3Dアニメーションに変換するAI搭載のモーションキャプチャーツールです。アニメーター、ゲーム開発者、コンテンツ制作者がリアルなキャラクターの動きを迅速かつ簡単に生成できるよう設計されており、主要な3Dソフトウェアとフォーマットをサポートしています。
製品概要
QuickMagic 製品概要
QuickMagicは、単一カメラのビデオを高品質な3Dアニメーションに変換するAI搭載のモーションキャプチャーツールです。アニメーター、ゲーム開発者、コンテンツ制作者がリアルなキャラクターの動きを迅速かつ簡単に生成できるよう設計されており、主要な3Dソフトウェアとフォーマットをサポートしています。
Preview
Rokoko 製品概要
Rokokoは、ハードウェアスーツとAI搭載ソフトウェアを含む完全なモーションキャプチャツールのエコシステムを提供し、すべてのクリエイターが手頃な価格でキャラクターアニメーションにアクセスできるように設計されています。身体、指、顔の動きをリアルタイムでキャプチャし、3Dワークフローにシームレスに統合します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | QuickMagic | Rokoko |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | モーションキャプチャ | モーションキャプチャ |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-07 | 2025-08-13 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | quickmagic.ai | www.rokoko.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | アプリ |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 144.3K | 275.9K |
| 月間成長率 | -3.7% | 3% |
| お気に入り | 103 | 85 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
QuickMagic vs Rokoko monthly traffic
Compare QuickMagic and Rokoko by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the QuickMagic vs Rokoko monthly traffic comparison, QuickMagic currently shows 144.3K visits and Rokoko shows 275.9K; Rokoko has about 1.9 times the visible traffic of QuickMagic, an absolute difference of about 131.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
QuickMagic is registered at the quickmagic.ai/home subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
QuickMagic monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
144.3K
平均滞在時間
4:10
訪問あたりページ数
3.84
直帰率
39.56%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 145.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 134.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 128.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 149.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 144.3K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 51.17% | 73.8K |
| 🇰🇷Korea, Republic of | 14.1% | 20.3K |
| 🇺🇦Ukraine | 13.76% | 19.9K |
| 🇹🇭Thailand | 12.83% | 18.5K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 8.14% | 11.7K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 87.4% | 126.1K |
| 参照元 | 8.73% | 12.6K |
| Eメール | 3.87% | 5.6K |
検索キーワード
quick magicquickmagicquick magic aiquickmagic aiquikmagic
Rokoko monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
275.9K
平均滞在時間
1:37
訪問あたりページ数
2.83
直帰率
41.58%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 267.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 291.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 255.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 301.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 267.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 275.9K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 36.52% | 100.8K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 24.88% | 68.6K |
| 🇫🇷France | 13.65% | 37.7K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 12.82% | 35.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 12.13% | 33.5K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 85.95% | 237.1K |
| 参照元 | 11.77% | 32.5K |
| Eメール | 2.28% | 6.3K |
検索キーワード
rokokorokoko mocaprokoko studiorokoko videorokoko vision
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Rokoko first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of QuickMagic and Rokoko
QuickMagic Core features
モーションキャプチャ
ゲーム開発
アニメーション
Rokoko Core features
モーションキャプチャ
ゲーム開発
アニメーション
Use cases
QuickMagic Use cases
3Dアニメーション
Blender
キャラクターアニメーション
ゲーム開発
モーションキャプチャ
Unity
アンリアル エンジン
動画をアニメーションに
VTubing
FBX
mmd
vmd
Rokoko Use cases
3Dアニメーション
Blender
キャラクターアニメーション
ゲーム開発
モーションキャプチャ
Unity
アンリアル エンジン
動画をアニメーションに
VTubing
映画制作
QuickMagic vs Rokoko：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth QuickMagic vs Rokoko comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. QuickMagic is primarily listed under “モーションキャプチャ”, while Rokoko is primarily listed under “モーションキャプチャ”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (QuickMagic: Website; Rokoko: App); Monthly visits (QuickMagic: 144.3K; Rokoko: 275.9K); Monthly growth (QuickMagic: -3.7%; Rokoko: 3%); Favorites (QuickMagic: 103; Rokoko: 85); Website (QuickMagic: quickmagic.ai; Rokoko: www.rokoko.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the QuickMagic vs Rokoko monthly traffic comparison, QuickMagic currently shows 144.3K visits and Rokoko shows 275.9K; Rokoko has about 1.9 times the visible traffic of QuickMagic, an absolute difference of about 131.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
QuickMagic is registered at the quickmagic.ai/home subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Rokoko first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
QuickMagic and Rokoko currently overlap in shared categories: モーションキャプチャ、ゲーム開発、アニメーション; shared tags: 3Dアニメーション、Blender、キャラクターアニメーション、ゲーム開発、モーションキャプチャ、Unity、アンリアル エンジン、動画をアニメーションに、VTubing. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
QuickMagic's unique categories/tags are FBX、mmd、vmd; Rokoko's are 映画制作. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
QuickMagic has no verified rating, 0 comments, 103 favorites, and 96 likes；Rokoko has no verified rating, 0 comments, 85 favorites, and 111 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate QuickMagic first
Put QuickMagic on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “モーションキャプチャ” and especially FBX、mmd、vmd. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
QuickMagic also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 144.3K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Rokoko first
Put Rokoko on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “モーションキャプチャ” and especially 映画制作. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Rokoko also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 275.9K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in QuickMagic and Rokoko, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between QuickMagic and Rokoko?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.