getfloorplan
3Dモデリング · 16.7K 月間訪問数
getfloorplanは、AIを活用したサービスで、簡単な間取り図（JPG、PNG、PDF）をアップロードするだけで、24時間以内にプロ品質の2D/3D間取り図、没入感のある360°バーチャルツアー、高品質なレンダリング画像を生成します。不動産専門家、開発者、物件管理者が、魅力的で効果的なマーケティング資料を迅速かつ手頃な価格で作成し、物件リスティングを強化して販売を加速させるために設計されています。
製品概要
getfloorplan 製品概要
getfloorplanは、AIを活用したサービスで、簡単な間取り図（JPG、PNG、PDF）をアップロードするだけで、24時間以内にプロ品質の2D/3D間取り図、没入感のある360°バーチャルツアー、高品質なレンダリング画像を生成します。不動産専門家、開発者、物件管理者が、魅力的で効果的なマーケティング資料を迅速かつ手頃な価格で作成し、物件リスティングを強化して販売を加速させるために設計されています。
Preview
Sphere 製品概要
Sphereは、不動産業者がスマートフォンだけで没入型の3Dバーチャルツアーを作成できる、AI搭載のiOSモバイルアプリです。高価な機材やプロのカメラマンを必要とせず、物件リスティングを強化し、購入者のエンゲージメントを高め、取引を迅速に成立させるための、高速で費用対効果の高いソリューションを提供します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | getfloorplan | Sphere |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 3Dモデリング | 3D & AR |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-02 | 2025-08-14 |
| 価格 | 有料 | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | getfloorplan.com | www.sphere.app |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | アプリ |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 16.7K | 1.1K |
| 月間成長率 | -39.3% | -21.8% |
| お気に入り | 115 | 83 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic
Compare getfloorplan and Sphere by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic comparison, getfloorplan currently shows 16.7K visits and Sphere shows 1.1K; getfloorplan has about 14.7 times the visible traffic of Sphere, an absolute difference of about 15.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
getfloorplan monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
16.7K
平均滞在時間
0:06
訪問あたりページ数
1.69
直帰率
40.3%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 34K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 26.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 26.7K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 26K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 27.6K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 16.7K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳India | 25.4% | 4.3K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 23.17% | 3.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 19.46% | 3.3K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 18.35% | 3.1K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 13.62% | 2.3K |
検索キーワード
ai floor plan app indiabest ai model to show plans in real lifeconvert house plans to 3d online freegetfloorplanhow can we upload a plan to ai models
Sphere monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
1.1K
平均滞在時間
0:39
訪問あたりページ数
1.72
直帰率
36.35%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 410 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 1.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 849 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 1.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 1.1K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 100% | 1.1K |
検索キーワード
3d realtor simulationrealtor cost to do one tourspheresphere 3duse your phone walk thru to do a 3d mock up of real estate
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate getfloorplan first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of getfloorplan and Sphere
getfloorplan Core features
バーチャルツアー
3Dモデリング
物件情報
Sphere Core features
バーチャルツアー
3D & AR
モバイルアプリ
ビデオ編集
Use cases
getfloorplan Use cases
不動産テクノロジー
バーチャルツアー
3Dフロアプラン
AIレンダリング
建築ビジュアライゼーション
間取り図ジェネレーター
インテリアデザイン
不動産テック
不動産マーケティング
Sphere Use cases
不動産テクノロジー
バーチャルツアー
360度ツアー
3Dツアー
AI
iOSアプリ
モバイルアプリ
不動産マーケティング
不動産
不動産エージェント
getfloorplan vs Sphere：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth getfloorplan vs Sphere comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. getfloorplan is primarily listed under “3Dモデリング”, while Sphere is primarily listed under “3D & AR”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (getfloorplan: 3Dモデリング; Sphere: 3D & AR); Product type (getfloorplan: Website; Sphere: App); Pricing (getfloorplan: Paid; Sphere: Freemium); Monthly visits (getfloorplan: 16.7K; Sphere: 1.1K); Monthly growth (getfloorplan: -39.3%; Sphere: -21.8%). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the getfloorplan vs Sphere monthly traffic comparison, getfloorplan currently shows 16.7K visits and Sphere shows 1.1K; getfloorplan has about 14.7 times the visible traffic of Sphere, an absolute difference of about 15.6K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate getfloorplan first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
getfloorplan and Sphere currently overlap in shared categories: バーチャルツアー; shared tags: 不動産テクノロジー、バーチャルツアー. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
getfloorplan's unique categories/tags are 3Dモデリング、物件情報、3Dフロアプラン、AIレンダリング、建築ビジュアライゼーション、間取り図ジェネレーター、インテリアデザイン、不動産テック; Sphere's are 3D & AR、モバイルアプリ、ビデオ編集、360度ツアー、3Dツアー、AI、iOSアプリ、不動産マーケティング. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
getfloorplan has no verified rating, 0 comments, 115 favorites, and 115 likes；Sphere has no verified rating, 0 comments, 83 favorites, and 83 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate getfloorplan first
Put getfloorplan on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3Dモデリング” and especially 3Dモデリング、物件情報、3Dフロアプラン、AIレンダリング、建築ビジュアライゼーション、間取り図ジェネレーター. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
getfloorplan also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 16.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Sphere first
Put Sphere on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D & AR” and especially 3D & AR、モバイルアプリ、ビデオ編集、360度ツアー、3Dツアー、AI. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Sphere also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 1.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in getfloorplan and Sphere, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between getfloorplan and Sphere?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.