Clinicminds
CRM · 203.2K 월 방문
Clinicminds는 에스테틱 클리닉을 위해 설계된 올인원 진료 관리 소프트웨어입니다. 전자 의료 기록(EMR), 온라인 예약, 디지털 동의서, 인보이스 발행 및 강력한 분석과 같은 기능으로 운영을 간소화하여 클리닉이 종이 없는 업무 환경을 구축하고 비즈니스를 효율적으로 성장시킬 수 있도록 돕습니다.
VS
ProgressMagic
CRM · 3.3K 월 방문
ProgressMagic은 치료사, 코치 및 의료 전문가를 위해 설계된 AI 기반 진료 관리 플랫폼입니다. 일정 관리 및 청구와 같은 행정 업무를 간소화하는 동시에 고객 진행 상황을 추적하기 위한 고급 도구를 제공합니다. AI를 활용하여 통찰력 있는 노트를 생성하고, 세션 데이터를 분석하며, 하나의 직관적인 대시보드에서 더 효과적이고 개인화된 치료를 제공하세요.
제품 개요
Clinicminds 제품 개요
Clinicminds는 에스테틱 클리닉을 위해 설계된 올인원 진료 관리 소프트웨어입니다. 전자 의료 기록(EMR), 온라인 예약, 디지털 동의서, 인보이스 발행 및 강력한 분석과 같은 기능으로 운영을 간소화하여 클리닉이 종이 없는 업무 환경을 구축하고 비즈니스를 효율적으로 성장시킬 수 있도록 돕습니다.
Preview
ProgressMagic 제품 개요
ProgressMagic은 치료사, 코치 및 의료 전문가를 위해 설계된 AI 기반 진료 관리 플랫폼입니다. 일정 관리 및 청구와 같은 행정 업무를 간소화하는 동시에 고객 진행 상황을 추적하기 위한 고급 도구를 제공합니다. AI를 활용하여 통찰력 있는 노트를 생성하고, 세션 데이터를 분석하며, 하나의 직관적인 대시보드에서 더 효과적이고 개인화된 치료를 제공하세요.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Clinicminds | ProgressMagic |
|---|---|---|
| 주요 카테고리 | CRM | CRM |
| 등록일 | 2025-08-03 | 2025-08-15 |
| 가격 | 유료 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 공식 사이트 | www.clinicminds.com | www.progressmagic.com |
| 제품 유형 | 웹사이트 | 웹사이트 |
| Performance data | ||
| 사용자 평점 | 확인되지 않음 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 댓글 | 0 | 0 |
| 월 방문 | 203.2K | 3.3K |
| 월 성장률 | 9.6% | 확인되지 않음 |
| 즐겨찾기 | 124 | 145 |
| Details | 상세 보기 | 상세 보기 |
Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic
Compare Clinicminds and ProgressMagic by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic comparison, Clinicminds currently shows 203.2K visits and ProgressMagic shows 3.3K; Clinicminds has about 60.7 times the visible traffic of ProgressMagic, an absolute difference of about 199.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Clinicminds has complete third-party traffic details; ProgressMagic uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Clinicminds monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
203.2K
평균 방문 시간
6:38
방문당 페이지
3.06
이탈률
39.46%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 109.4K 월 방문
- 2026/1: 122.4K 월 방문
- 2026/2: 101.1K 월 방문
- 2026/3: 155K 월 방문
- 2026/4: 185.3K 월 방문
- 2026/5: 203.2K 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱Netherlands | 95.86% | 194.8K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 1.75% | 3.6K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 1.41% | 2.9K |
| 🇮🇳India | 0.62% | 1.3K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 0.36% | 732 |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 54.2% | 110.1K |
| 이메일 | 32.75% | 66.5K |
| 리퍼럴 | 13.05% | 26.5K |
검색 키워드
clinic mindsclinicmindsclinicminds api docsinloggen clinic minds dr finntreatwell
ProgressMagic monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
3.3K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Clinicminds and ProgressMagic
Clinicminds Core features
CRM
일정 관리
송장 발행
실무 관리
ProgressMagic Core features
CRM
일정 관리
임상 지원
실무 관리
Use cases
Clinicminds Use cases
실무 관리
에스테틱 클리닉
약속 예약
클리닉 분석
CRM
디지털 동의
전자 건강 기록
EMR
청구서 발행
의료 소프트웨어
환자 관리
ProgressMagic Use cases
실무 관리
AI 노트
고객 관리
코칭 소프트웨어
HIPAA 준수
의료비 청구
진행 상황 추적
스케줄링
원격 의료
치료사 도구
Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Clinicminds is primarily listed under “CRM”, while ProgressMagic is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Clinicminds: Paid; ProgressMagic: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Clinicminds: 203.2K; ProgressMagic: 3.3K); Favorites (Clinicminds: 124; ProgressMagic: 145); Website (Clinicminds: www.clinicminds.com; ProgressMagic: www.progressmagic.com); Added (Clinicminds: 2025-08-03; ProgressMagic: 2025-08-15). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic comparison, Clinicminds currently shows 203.2K visits and ProgressMagic shows 3.3K; Clinicminds has about 60.7 times the visible traffic of ProgressMagic, an absolute difference of about 199.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Clinicminds has complete third-party traffic details; ProgressMagic uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Clinicminds and ProgressMagic currently overlap in shared categories: CRM 및 일정 관리; shared tags: 실무 관리. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Clinicminds's unique categories/tags are 송장 발행, 실무 관리, 에스테틱 클리닉, 약속 예약, 클리닉 분석, CRM, 디지털 동의 및 전자 건강 기록; ProgressMagic's are 임상 지원, 실무 관리, AI 노트, 고객 관리, 코칭 소프트웨어, HIPAA 준수, 의료비 청구 및 진행 상황 추적. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Clinicminds has no verified rating, 0 comments, 124 favorites, and 121 likes；ProgressMagic has no verified rating, 0 comments, 145 favorites, and 140 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Clinicminds first
Put Clinicminds on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially 송장 발행, 실무 관리, 에스테틱 클리닉, 약속 예약, 클리닉 분석 및 CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Clinicminds also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 203.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate ProgressMagic first
Put ProgressMagic on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially 임상 지원, 실무 관리, AI 노트, 고객 관리, 코칭 소프트웨어 및 HIPAA 준수. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
ProgressMagic also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Clinicminds and ProgressMagic, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between Clinicminds and ProgressMagic?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.