AFFiNE
화이트보드 · 396K 월 방문
AFFiNE은 문서, 화이트보드, 데이터베이스를 완벽하게 통합한 AI 기반 올인원 지식 OS입니다. 개인 정보 보호에 중점을 둔 오픈 소스 작업 공간으로, 여러 애플리케이션을 전환할 필요 없이 단일 통합 환경에서 글쓰기, 그리기, 계획을 수행하여 생산성을 향상시키도록 설계되었습니다.
제품 개요
AFFiNE 제품 개요
AFFiNE은 문서, 화이트보드, 데이터베이스를 완벽하게 통합한 AI 기반 올인원 지식 OS입니다. 개인 정보 보호에 중점을 둔 오픈 소스 작업 공간으로, 여러 애플리케이션을 전환할 필요 없이 단일 통합 환경에서 글쓰기, 그리기, 계획을 수행하여 생산성을 향상시키도록 설계되었습니다.
Preview
Craft 제품 개요
Craft는 노트, 작업, 아이디어를 위한 아름답게 디자인된 네이티브 문서 편집기입니다. 로컬 AI 어시스턴트, 작업 관리, 유연한 정리와 같은 강력한 기능과 즐겁고 빠르며 오프라인 우선 사용자 경험을 결합하여 작가, 사상가, 팀이 생각을 포착하고 구조화하는 데 완벽한 도구입니다.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | AFFiNE | Craft |
|---|---|---|
| 주요 카테고리 | 화이트보드 | 지식 관리 |
| 등록일 | 2025-08-10 | 2025-08-08 |
| 가격 | 프리미엄 | 프리미엄 |
| 공식 사이트 | affine.pro | www.craft.do |
| 제품 유형 | 웹사이트 | 앱 |
| Performance data | ||
| 사용자 평점 | 확인되지 않음 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 댓글 | 0 | 0 |
| 월 방문 | 396K | 774.4K |
| 월 성장률 | -0.3% | 2.2% |
| 즐겨찾기 | 97 | 145 |
| Details | 상세 보기 | 상세 보기 |
AFFiNE vs Craft monthly traffic
Compare AFFiNE and Craft by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the AFFiNE vs Craft monthly traffic comparison, AFFiNE currently shows 396K visits and Craft shows 774.4K; Craft has about 2 times the visible traffic of AFFiNE, an absolute difference of about 378.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Craft is registered at the www.craft.do/zh-CN subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
AFFiNE monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
396K
평균 방문 시간
2:50
방문당 페이지
3.64
이탈률
39.23%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 376.5K 월 방문
- 2026/1: 494.2K 월 방문
- 2026/2: 372K 월 방문
- 2026/3: 428.4K 월 방문
- 2026/4: 397.4K 월 방문
- 2026/5: 396K 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 26.19% | 103.7K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 22.64% | 89.7K |
| 🇮🇳India | 20.71% | 82K |
| 🇨🇳China | 18.97% | 75.1K |
| 🇵🇱Poland | 11.49% | 45.5K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 83.41% | 330.3K |
| 리퍼럴 | 14.68% | 58.1K |
| 이메일 | 1.91% | 7.6K |
검색 키워드
affineaffine notesaffine procornell notes templateschedule builder uc davis
Craft monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
774.4K
평균 방문 시간
3:04
방문당 페이지
4.1
이탈률
41.96%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 1.1M 월 방문
- 2026/2: 867.3K 월 방문
- 2026/3: 807K 월 방문
- 2026/4: 757.4K 월 방문
- 2026/5: 774.4K 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 46.79% | 362.3K |
| 🇨🇳China | 18.27% | 141.5K |
| 🇯🇵Japan | 15.79% | 122.3K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 11.21% | 86.8K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 7.94% | 61.5K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 87.07% | 674.3K |
| 리퍼럴 | 10.14% | 78.5K |
| 이메일 | 2.79% | 21.6K |
검색 키워드
craftcraft agentcraft agentscraft appcraft docs
Traffic-based selection guidance: Craft is registered under a www.craft.do subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Craft for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of AFFiNE and Craft
AFFiNE Core features
지식 관리
메모 작성
작업 관리
화이트보드
Craft Core features
지식 관리
메모 작성
작업 관리
Use cases
AFFiNE Use cases
협업
지식 기반
필기
작업 관리
AI 작가
Miro 대체
노션 대안
오픈 소스
프라이버시 중심
프로젝트 관리
화이트보드
Craft Use cases
협업
지식 기반
필기
작업 관리
AI 비서
문서 편집기
마크다운
오프라인 노트
생산성
글쓰기
AFFiNE vs Craft：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth AFFiNE vs Craft comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. AFFiNE is primarily listed under “화이트보드”, while Craft is primarily listed under “지식 관리”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (AFFiNE: 화이트보드; Craft: 지식 관리); Product type (AFFiNE: Website; Craft: App); Monthly visits (AFFiNE: 396K; Craft: 774.4K); Monthly growth (AFFiNE: -0.3%; Craft: 2.2%); Favorites (AFFiNE: 97; Craft: 145). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the AFFiNE vs Craft monthly traffic comparison, AFFiNE currently shows 396K visits and Craft shows 774.4K; Craft has about 2 times the visible traffic of AFFiNE, an absolute difference of about 378.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Craft is registered at the www.craft.do/zh-CN subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Craft is registered under a www.craft.do subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Craft for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
AFFiNE and Craft currently overlap in shared categories: 지식 관리, 메모 작성 및 작업 관리; shared tags: 협업, 지식 기반, 필기 및 작업 관리. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
AFFiNE's unique categories/tags are 화이트보드, AI 작가, Miro 대체, 노션 대안, 오픈 소스, 프라이버시 중심 및 프로젝트 관리; Craft's are AI 비서, 문서 편집기, 마크다운, 오프라인 노트, 생산성 및 글쓰기. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
AFFiNE has no verified rating, 0 comments, 97 favorites, and 104 likes；Craft has no verified rating, 0 comments, 145 favorites, and 135 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate AFFiNE first
Put AFFiNE on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “화이트보드” and especially 화이트보드, AI 작가, Miro 대체, 노션 대안, 오픈 소스 및 프라이버시 중심. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
AFFiNE also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 396K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Craft first
Put Craft on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “지식 관리” and especially AI 비서, 문서 편집기, 마크다운, 오프라인 노트, 생산성 및 글쓰기. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Craft also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 774.4K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in AFFiNE and Craft, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between AFFiNE and Craft?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.
