DingTalk
경영 · 19.2M 월 방문
DingTalk은 AI 기반의 올인원 기업 협업 및 관리 플랫폼입니다. 인스턴트 메시징, 화상 회의, 프로젝트 관리 및 전체 오피스 스위트를 통합하고 지능형 어시스턴트, 자동 회의록, AI 기반 데이터 분석과 같은 고급 AI 기능을 제공합니다. 모든 규모의 비즈니스를 위해 설계되었으며 워크플로우를 간소화하고 생산성을 향상시키며 HR부터 재무까지 조직 운영을 디지털화합니다.
제품 개요
DingTalk 제품 개요
DingTalk은 AI 기반의 올인원 기업 협업 및 관리 플랫폼입니다. 인스턴트 메시징, 화상 회의, 프로젝트 관리 및 전체 오피스 스위트를 통합하고 지능형 어시스턴트, 자동 회의록, AI 기반 데이터 분석과 같은 고급 AI 기능을 제공합니다. 모든 규모의 비즈니스를 위해 설계되었으며 워크플로우를 간소화하고 생산성을 향상시키며 HR부터 재무까지 조직 운영을 디지털화합니다.
Preview
eboard 제품 개요
eBoard는 다양한 부문의 이사회를 위해 운영을 간소화하고 거버넌스를 강화하며 참여를 유도하도록 설계된 올인원 보안 이사회 관리 플랫폼입니다. 직관적인 단일 클라우드 기반 솔루션에서 커뮤니케이션, 문서 및 회의 워크플로를 중앙 집중화합니다.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | DingTalk | eboard |
|---|---|---|
| 주요 카테고리 | 경영 | 경영 |
| 등록일 | 2025-08-10 | 2025-08-14 |
| 가격 | 프리미엄 | 유료 |
| 공식 사이트 | www.dingtalk.com | eboard.cloud |
| 제품 유형 | 앱 | 웹사이트 |
| Performance data | ||
| 사용자 평점 | 확인되지 않음 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 댓글 | 0 | 0 |
| 월 방문 | 19.2M | 1.3K |
| 월 성장률 | -2.1% | 171.2% |
| 즐겨찾기 | 104 | 118 |
| Details | 상세 보기 | 상세 보기 |
DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic
Compare DingTalk and eboard by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
DingTalk monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
19.2M
평균 방문 시간
7:44
방문당 페이지
5.02
이탈률
33.01%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 19.7M 월 방문
- 2026/1: 19.1M 월 방문
- 2026/2: 13.1M 월 방문
- 2026/3: 22.6M 월 방문
- 2026/4: 19.6M 월 방문
- 2026/5: 19.2M 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳China | 94.5% | 18.2M |
| 🇺🇸United States | 2.35% | 451.4K |
| 🇭🇰Hong Kong | 1.68% | 322.7K |
| 🇸🇬Singapore | 0.91% | 174.8K |
| 🇹🇼Taiwan | 0.56% | 107.6K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 89.67% | 17.2M |
| 리퍼럴 | 10.1% | 1.9M |
| 이메일 | 0.23% | 44.2K |
검색 키워드
dingding悟空钉钉钉钉文档钉钉网页版
eboard monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
1.3K
평균 방문 시간
0:05
방문당 페이지
1.72
이탈률
36.45%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/7: 690 월 방문
- 2025/8: 0 월 방문
- 2025/9: 473 월 방문
- 2026/3: 0 월 방문
- 2026/4: 0 월 방문
- 2026/5: 1.3K 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 57.65% | 740 |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 27.52% | 353 |
| 🇰🇷Korea, Republic of | 14.83% | 190 |
검색 키워드
e boarde-boardeboarde-board memberwhat does e baord mean
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of DingTalk and eboard
DingTalk Core features
경영
협업
팀 채팅
eboard Core features
경영
협업
데이터 보호
Use cases
DingTalk Use cases
AI 비서
알리바바
기업 커뮤니케이션
인사 관리
로우코드 플랫폼
오피스 스위트
프로젝트 관리
팀 협업
화상 회의
eboard Use cases
이사회 관리
이사회 포털
협업
기업 지배구조
의사결정
문서 보안
거버넌스
회의 관리
비영리
DingTalk vs eboard：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth DingTalk vs eboard comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. DingTalk is primarily listed under “경영”, while eboard is primarily listed under “경영”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (DingTalk: App; eboard: Website); Pricing (DingTalk: Freemium; eboard: Paid); Monthly visits (DingTalk: 19.2M; eboard: 1.3K); Monthly growth (DingTalk: -2.1%; eboard: 171.2%); Favorites (DingTalk: 104; eboard: 118). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
DingTalk and eboard currently overlap in shared categories: 경영 및 협업. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
DingTalk's unique categories/tags are 팀 채팅, AI 비서, 알리바바, 기업 커뮤니케이션, 인사 관리, 로우코드 플랫폼, 오피스 스위트 및 프로젝트 관리; eboard's are 데이터 보호, 이사회 관리, 이사회 포털, 협업, 기업 지배구조, 의사결정, 문서 보안 및 거버넌스. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
DingTalk has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 113 likes；eboard has no verified rating, 0 comments, 118 favorites, and 121 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate DingTalk first
Put DingTalk on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “경영” and especially 팀 채팅, AI 비서, 알리바바, 기업 커뮤니케이션, 인사 관리 및 로우코드 플랫폼. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
DingTalk also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 19.2M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate eboard first
Put eboard on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “경영” and especially 데이터 보호, 이사회 관리, 이사회 포털, 협업, 기업 지배구조 및 의사결정. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
eboard also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in DingTalk and eboard, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between DingTalk and eboard?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.