Fluidstack
기업 솔루션 · 101.4K 월 방문
Fluidstack은 최첨단 AI 모델의 훈련 및 서비스를 위한 고성능 전용 GPU 클러스터를 제공하는 선도적인 AI 클라우드 플랫폼입니다. 수천 개의 GPU를 신속하게 배포하고, 24/7 전문가 지원을 포함한 완전 관리형 서비스를 제공하며, 데이터 전송 비용이 없는 투명한 가격 정책으로 AI 팀이 인프라 문제 없이 확장할 수 있도록 지원합니다.
VS
Vast.ai
GPU 렌탈 · 1.4M 월 방문
Vast.ai는 AI 및 머신러닝 워크로드를 위해 방대한 GPU 네트워크에 대한 온디맨드 액세스를 제공하는 선도적인 GPU 클라우드 플랫폼입니다. 투명한 종량제 마켓플레이스를 통해 기존 클라우드 제공업체보다 최대 80% 저렴한 비용으로 개발자와 기업에 고성능 컴퓨팅을 제공합니다.
제품 개요
Fluidstack 제품 개요
Fluidstack은 최첨단 AI 모델의 훈련 및 서비스를 위한 고성능 전용 GPU 클러스터를 제공하는 선도적인 AI 클라우드 플랫폼입니다. 수천 개의 GPU를 신속하게 배포하고, 24/7 전문가 지원을 포함한 완전 관리형 서비스를 제공하며, 데이터 전송 비용이 없는 투명한 가격 정책으로 AI 팀이 인프라 문제 없이 확장할 수 있도록 지원합니다.
Preview
Vast.ai 제품 개요
Vast.ai는 AI 및 머신러닝 워크로드를 위해 방대한 GPU 네트워크에 대한 온디맨드 액세스를 제공하는 선도적인 GPU 클라우드 플랫폼입니다. 투명한 종량제 마켓플레이스를 통해 기존 클라우드 제공업체보다 최대 80% 저렴한 비용으로 개발자와 기업에 고성능 컴퓨팅을 제공합니다.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
Fluidstack vs Vast.ai monthly traffic
Compare Fluidstack and Vast.ai by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Fluidstack vs Vast.ai monthly traffic comparison, Fluidstack currently shows 101.4K visits and Vast.ai shows 1.4M; Vast.ai has about 13.4 times the visible traffic of Fluidstack, an absolute difference of about 1.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Fluidstack monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
101.4K
평균 방문 시간
1:06
방문당 페이지
2.58
이탈률
39.33%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 28.9K 월 방문
- 2026/1: 91.6K 월 방문
- 2026/2: 69.4K 월 방문
- 2026/3: 95.5K 월 방문
- 2026/4: 101K 월 방문
- 2026/5: 101.4K 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 87.31% | 88.5K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 6.99% | 7.1K |
| 🇮🇳India | 2.34% | 2.4K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 1.75% | 1.8K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 1.61% | 1.6K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 77.86% | 79K |
| 리퍼럴 | 16.42% | 16.7K |
| 이메일 | 5.72% | 5.8K |
검색 키워드
fluid stackfluidstackfluidstack careersfluidstack jobsfluidstack technical program manager, deployments
Vast.ai monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
1.4M
평균 방문 시간
4:06
방문당 페이지
3.72
이탈률
39.14%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 870.3K 월 방문
- 2026/1: 943.6K 월 방문
- 2026/2: 1.1M 월 방문
- 2026/3: 1.2M 월 방문
- 2026/4: 1.2M 월 방문
- 2026/5: 1.4M 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 38.98% | 530.3K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 17.55% | 238.7K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 16.16% | 219.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 14.03% | 190.9K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 13.28% | 180.7K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 96.48% | 1.3M |
| 리퍼럴 | 2.61% | 35.5K |
| 이메일 | 0.91% | 12.4K |
검색 키워드
gpu cloudvastvast aivast.aivastai
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Vast.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Fluidstack and Vast.ai
Fluidstack Core features
클라우드 컴퓨팅
기업 솔루션
머신러닝
Vast.ai Core features
클라우드 컴퓨팅
GPU 렌탈
API
Use cases
Fluidstack Use cases
AI 인프라
클라우드 컴퓨팅
딥러닝
추론
기계 학습
모델 학습
B200
기업 AI
GPU 클라우드
H100
고성능 컴퓨팅
Vast.ai Use cases
AI 인프라
클라우드 컴퓨팅
딥러닝
추론
기계 학습
모델 학습
API
가성비 좋은 GPU
개발자 도구
GPU 렌탈
확장 가능한 컴퓨팅
Fluidstack vs Vast.ai：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Fluidstack vs Vast.ai comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fluidstack is primarily listed under “기업 솔루션”, while Vast.ai is primarily listed under “GPU 렌탈”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fluidstack: 기업 솔루션; Vast.ai: GPU 렌탈); Monthly visits (Fluidstack: 101.4K; Vast.ai: 1.4M); Monthly growth (Fluidstack: 0.4%; Vast.ai: 17.1%); Favorites (Fluidstack: 95; Vast.ai: 109); Website (Fluidstack: www.fluidstack.io; Vast.ai: vast.ai). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Fluidstack vs Vast.ai monthly traffic comparison, Fluidstack currently shows 101.4K visits and Vast.ai shows 1.4M; Vast.ai has about 13.4 times the visible traffic of Fluidstack, an absolute difference of about 1.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Vast.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Fluidstack and Vast.ai currently overlap in shared categories: 클라우드 컴퓨팅; shared tags: AI 인프라, 클라우드 컴퓨팅, 딥러닝, 추론, 기계 학습 및 모델 학습. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Fluidstack's unique categories/tags are 기업 솔루션, 머신러닝, B200, 기업 AI, GPU 클라우드, H100 및 고성능 컴퓨팅; Vast.ai's are GPU 렌탈, API, 가성비 좋은 GPU, 개발자 도구 및 확장 가능한 컴퓨팅. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Fluidstack has no verified rating, 0 comments, 95 favorites, and 92 likes；Vast.ai has no verified rating, 0 comments, 109 favorites, and 106 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Fluidstack first
Put Fluidstack on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “기업 솔루션” and especially 기업 솔루션, 머신러닝, B200, 기업 AI, GPU 클라우드 및 H100. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Fluidstack also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 101.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Vast.ai first
Put Vast.ai on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “GPU 렌탈” and especially GPU 렌탈, API, 가성비 좋은 GPU, 개발자 도구 및 확장 가능한 컴퓨팅. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Vast.ai also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fluidstack and Vast.ai, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between Fluidstack and Vast.ai?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.