ToolMage
Entrar
CustomJS
Backend · 19K visitas mensais

CustomJS é uma plataforma poderosa que preenche a lacuna entre o no-code e o desenvolvimento personalizado. Permite executar JavaScript, usar módulos NPM e integrar lógica personalizada em suas plataformas de automação favoritas como Make, Zapier e Airtable. Desbloqueie funcionalidades avançadas como geração de PDF, web scraping e criação de API sem gerenciar seus próprios servidores.

VS
Make
CRM · 6.7M visitas mensais

Make é uma poderosa plataforma visual que permite projetar, construir e automatizar qualquer coisa — de tarefas simples a fluxos de trabalho complexos — sem código. Ele conecta milhares de aplicativos e serviços, incluindo ferramentas avançadas de IA como OpenAI e Google Gemini, permitindo que você crie automações inteligentes e agentes de IA para otimizar suas operações de negócios, marketing, vendas e muito mais.

CustomJS vs Make: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare CustomJS e Make por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

CustomJS Visão geral

CustomJS é uma plataforma poderosa que preenche a lacuna entre o no-code e o desenvolvimento personalizado. Permite executar JavaScript, usar módulos NPM e integrar lógica personalizada em suas plataformas de automação favoritas como Make, Zapier e Airtable. Desbloqueie funcionalidades avançadas como geração de PDF, web scraping e criação de API sem gerenciar seus próprios servidores.

Preview

Make Visão geral

Make é uma poderosa plataforma visual que permite projetar, construir e automatizar qualquer coisa — de tarefas simples a fluxos de trabalho complexos — sem código. Ele conecta milhares de aplicativos e serviços, incluindo ferramentas avançadas de IA como OpenAI e Google Gemini, permitindo que você crie automações inteligentes e agentes de IA para otimizar suas operações de negócios, marketing, vendas e muito mais.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureCustomJSMake
Categoria principalBackendCRM
Adicionado2025-08-022025-08-08
PreçoFreemiumFreemium
Site oficialwww.customjs.spacewww.make.com
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais19K6.7M
Crescimento mensal-6.4%12.7%
Favoritos126122
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic

Compare CustomJS and Make by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic comparison, CustomJS currently shows 19K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 352.9 times the visible traffic of CustomJS, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

CustomJS monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
19K
Duração média
0:25
Páginas por visita
2.08
Taxa de rejeição
38.59%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 16.8K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 17.6K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 13.4K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 21.9K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 20.2K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 19K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States46.23%8.8K
🇮🇳India18.79%3.6K
🇮🇩Indonesia15.07%2.9K
🇵🇰Pakistan9.96%1.9K
🇧🇷Brazil9.95%1.9K

Palavras-chave

custom jshtml to pdfinvoice generator online htmltypescript fetch called from power automateworkflows n8n product knowledge dari pdf

Make monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
6.7M
Duração média
7:28
Páginas por visita
8.43
Taxa de rejeição
32.56%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/1: 5.4M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 5M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 6.1M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 5.9M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 6.7M Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States40.62%2.7M
🇮🇳India19.69%1.3M
🇫🇷France18.85%1.3M
🇩🇪Germany11.09%741.7K
🇮🇱Israel9.75%652.1K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto90.82%6.1M
Referência6.17%412.7K
E-mail3.01%201.3K

Palavras-chave

gemini aimakemake aimake.comn8n
Traffic-based selection guidance: Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of CustomJS and Make

CustomJS Core features

Sem Código
Automação
Backend

Make Core features

Sem Código
Automação
CRM
Automação de Marketing

Use cases

CustomJS Use cases

API
automação
No-code
Ferramentas de desenvolvedor
JavaScript
Criar
Geração de PDF
Serverless
automação de fluxo de trabalho
Zapier

Make Use cases

API
automação
No-code
Agente de IA
Chatbot
Sincronização de dados
integração
iPaaS
Automação de marketing
produtividade
fluxo de trabalho

CustomJS vs Make:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth CustomJS vs Make comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. CustomJS is primarily listed under “Backend”, while Make is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (CustomJS: Backend; Make: CRM); Monthly visits (CustomJS: 19K; Make: 6.7M); Monthly growth (CustomJS: -6.4%; Make: 12.7%); Favorites (CustomJS: 126; Make: 122); Website (CustomJS: www.customjs.space; Make: www.make.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic comparison, CustomJS currently shows 19K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 352.9 times the visible traffic of CustomJS, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

CustomJS and Make currently overlap in shared categories: Sem Código e Automação; shared tags: API, automação e No-code. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

CustomJS's unique categories/tags are Backend, Ferramentas de desenvolvedor, JavaScript, Criar, Geração de PDF, Serverless, automação de fluxo de trabalho e Zapier; Make's are CRM, Automação de Marketing, Agente de IA, Chatbot, Sincronização de dados, integração, iPaaS e Automação de marketing. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

CustomJS has no verified rating, 0 comments, 126 favorites, and 124 likes;Make has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 125 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate CustomJS first

Put CustomJS on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Backend” and especially Backend, Ferramentas de desenvolvedor, JavaScript, Criar, Geração de PDF e Serverless. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

CustomJS also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 19K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Make first

Put Make on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially CRM, Automação de Marketing, Agente de IA, Chatbot, Sincronização de dados e integração. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Make also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in CustomJS and Make, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between CustomJS and Make?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.