ToolMage
Entrar
DingTalk
Gestão · 19.2M visitas mensais

O DingTalk é uma plataforma completa de colaboração e gestão empresarial alimentada por IA. Integra mensagens instantâneas, videoconferências, gestão de projetos e um pacote de escritório completo com capacidades avançadas de IA, como assistentes inteligentes, resumos de reuniões automatizados e análise de dados por IA. Projetado para empresas de todos os tamanhos, otimiza fluxos de trabalho, aumenta a produtividade e digitaliza as operações organizacionais, do RH às finanças.

Visitar siteVer detalhes
VS
eboard
Gestão · 1.3K visitas mensais

O eBoard é uma plataforma de gestão de conselhos segura e completa, projetada para otimizar operações, aprimorar a governança e impulsionar o engajamento de conselhos em vários setores. Ele centraliza a comunicação, documentos e fluxos de trabalho de reuniões em uma única solução intuitiva baseada em nuvem.

Visitar siteVer detalhes

DingTalk vs eboard: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare DingTalk e eboard por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

DingTalk Visão geral

O DingTalk é uma plataforma completa de colaboração e gestão empresarial alimentada por IA. Integra mensagens instantâneas, videoconferências, gestão de projetos e um pacote de escritório completo com capacidades avançadas de IA, como assistentes inteligentes, resumos de reuniões automatizados e análise de dados por IA. Projetado para empresas de todos os tamanhos, otimiza fluxos de trabalho, aumenta a produtividade e digitaliza as operações organizacionais, do RH às finanças.

Preview

eboard Visão geral

O eBoard é uma plataforma de gestão de conselhos segura e completa, projetada para otimizar operações, aprimorar a governança e impulsionar o engajamento de conselhos em vários setores. Ele centraliza a comunicação, documentos e fluxos de trabalho de reuniões em uma única solução intuitiva baseada em nuvem.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureDingTalkeboard
Categoria principalGestãoGestão
Adicionado2025-08-102025-08-14
PreçoFreemiumPago
Site oficialwww.dingtalk.comeboard.cloud
Tipo de produtoAplicativoSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais19.2M1.3K
Crescimento mensal-2.1%171.2%
Favoritos104118
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic

Compare DingTalk and eboard by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

DingTalk monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
19.2M
Duração média
7:44
Páginas por visita
5.02
Taxa de rejeição
33.01%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 19.7M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 19.1M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 13.1M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 22.6M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 19.6M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 19.2M Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇨🇳China94.5%18.2M
🇺🇸United States2.35%451.4K
🇭🇰Hong Kong1.68%322.7K
🇸🇬Singapore0.91%174.8K
🇹🇼Taiwan0.56%107.6K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto89.67%17.2M
Referência10.1%1.9M
E-mail0.23%44.2K

Palavras-chave

dingding悟空钉钉钉钉文档钉钉网页版

eboard monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
1.3K
Duração média
0:05
Páginas por visita
1.72
Taxa de rejeição
36.45%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/7: 690 Visitas mensais
  • 2025/8: 0 Visitas mensais
  • 2025/9: 473 Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 0 Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 0 Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 1.3K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States57.65%740
🇮🇩Indonesia27.52%353
🇰🇷Korea, Republic of14.83%190

Palavras-chave

e boarde-boardeboarde-board memberwhat does e baord mean
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of DingTalk and eboard

DingTalk Core features

Gestão
Colaboração
Chat de Equipe

eboard Core features

Gestão
Colaboração
Proteção de Dados

Use cases

DingTalk Use cases

Assistente de IA
Alibaba
Comunicação empresarial
Gestão de RH
plataforma low-code
Suíte de escritório
gerenciamento de projetos
Colaboração em equipe
Videoconferência

eboard Use cases

Gestão do Conselho
Portal do Conselho
Colaboração
governança corporativa
Tomada de decisão
segurança de documentos
Governança
Gestão de reuniões
Sem fins lucrativos

DingTalk vs eboard：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth DingTalk vs eboard comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. DingTalk is primarily listed under “Gestão”, while eboard is primarily listed under “Gestão”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (DingTalk: App; eboard: Website); Pricing (DingTalk: Freemium; eboard: Paid); Monthly visits (DingTalk: 19.2M; eboard: 1.3K); Monthly growth (DingTalk: -2.1%; eboard: 171.2%); Favorites (DingTalk: 104; eboard: 118). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the DingTalk vs eboard monthly traffic comparison, DingTalk currently shows 19.2M visits and eboard shows 1.3K; DingTalk has about 14,972.1 times the visible traffic of eboard, an absolute difference of about 19.2M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate DingTalk first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

DingTalk and eboard currently overlap in shared categories: Gestão e Colaboração. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

DingTalk's unique categories/tags are Chat de Equipe, Assistente de IA, Alibaba, Comunicação empresarial, Gestão de RH, plataforma low-code, Suíte de escritório e gerenciamento de projetos; eboard's are Proteção de Dados, Gestão do Conselho, Portal do Conselho, Colaboração, governança corporativa, Tomada de decisão, segurança de documentos e Governança. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

DingTalk has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 113 likes；eboard has no verified rating, 0 comments, 118 favorites, and 121 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate DingTalk first

Put DingTalk on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestão” and especially Chat de Equipe, Assistente de IA, Alibaba, Comunicação empresarial, Gestão de RH e plataforma low-code. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

DingTalk also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 19.2M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate eboard first

Put eboard on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestão” and especially Proteção de Dados, Gestão do Conselho, Portal do Conselho, Colaboração, governança corporativa e Tomada de decisão. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

eboard also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in DingTalk and eboard, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between DingTalk and eboard?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.