ToolMage
Entrar
Flowise
Implantação de Modelo · 210.5K visitas mensais

Flowise é uma plataforma open-source de baixo código para construir visualmente agentes e aplicações de IA personalizadas. Usando uma interface de arrastar e soltar, desenvolvedores e equipes podem prototipar e implantar rapidamente sistemas complexos, desde chatbots com tecnologia RAG até fluxos de trabalho multi-agente. Suporta mais de 100 LLMs, várias fontes de dados e oferece recursos de nível empresarial para implantação escalável.

VS
Langflow
Low-code No-code · 243.6K visitas mensais

Langflow é uma UI visual de código aberto para construir e implantar aplicações de IA. Possui uma interface de arrastar e soltar para encadear LLMs, agentes e ferramentas, permitindo a prototipagem e implantação rápidas de fluxos de trabalho complexos como RAG e sistemas multiagente. Suporta integrações extensas e oferece opções auto-hospedadas e na nuvem.

Flowise vs Langflow: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare Flowise e Langflow por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

Flowise Visão geral

Flowise é uma plataforma open-source de baixo código para construir visualmente agentes e aplicações de IA personalizadas. Usando uma interface de arrastar e soltar, desenvolvedores e equipes podem prototipar e implantar rapidamente sistemas complexos, desde chatbots com tecnologia RAG até fluxos de trabalho multi-agente. Suporta mais de 100 LLMs, várias fontes de dados e oferece recursos de nível empresarial para implantação escalável.

Preview

Langflow Visão geral

Langflow é uma UI visual de código aberto para construir e implantar aplicações de IA. Possui uma interface de arrastar e soltar para encadear LLMs, agentes e ferramentas, permitindo a prototipagem e implantação rápidas de fluxos de trabalho complexos como RAG e sistemas multiagente. Suporta integrações extensas e oferece opções auto-hospedadas e na nuvem.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureFlowiseLangflow
Categoria principalImplantação de ModeloLow-code No-code
Adicionado2025-08-082025-08-14
PreçoFreemiumFreemium
Site oficialflowiseai.comwww.langflow.org
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais210.5K243.6K
Crescimento mensal-5.9%6.2%
Favoritos11969
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic

Compare Flowise and Langflow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic comparison, Flowise currently shows 210.5K visits and Langflow shows 243.6K; Langflow has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Flowise, an absolute difference of about 33.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Flowise monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
210.5K
Duração média
1:55
Páginas por visita
3.71
Taxa de rejeição
40.16%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 327.9K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 240.1K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 195.9K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 226.4K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 223.8K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 210.5K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇮🇳India34.54%72.7K
🇺🇸United States25%52.6K
🇸🇬Singapore14.48%30.5K
🇻🇳Vietnam14.48%30.5K
🇩🇪Germany11.5%24.2K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto71.85%151.3K
Referência27.25%57.4K
E-mail0.9%1.9K

Palavras-chave

flowiseflowise aiflowiseaiflowiseai apiflowwise

Langflow monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
243.6K
Duração média
1:09
Páginas por visita
1.95
Taxa de rejeição
44.67%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 454.9K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 269.8K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 226.5K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 239.5K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 229.4K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 243.6K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇨🇳China42.24%102.9K
🇮🇳India18.05%44K
🇺🇸United States16.88%41.1K
🇮🇩Indonesia16.72%40.7K
🇬🇧United Kingdom6.11%14.9K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto78.32%190.8K
Referência20.42%49.7K
E-mail1.26%3.1K

Palavras-chave

composiolangflowlangfuseopenrouterpdf to markdown
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Flowise and Langflow

Flowise Core features

Low-code No-code
Implantação de Modelo
Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho
Chatbot

Langflow Core features

Low-code No-code
Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho

Use cases

Flowise Use cases

Agente de IA
Ferramentas de desenvolvedor
low-code
Sistemas multiagente
No-code
Código Aberto
Geração Aumentada por Recuperação
Construtor visual
automação de fluxo de trabalho
Construtor de chatbot
LangChain

Langflow Use cases

Agente de IA
Ferramentas de desenvolvedor
low-code
Sistemas multiagente
No-code
Código Aberto
Geração Aumentada por Recuperação
Construtor visual
automação de fluxo de trabalho
API
Modelo de Linguagem de Grande Escala

Flowise vs Langflow:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Flowise vs Langflow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Flowise is primarily listed under “Implantação de Modelo”, while Langflow is primarily listed under “Low-code No-code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Flowise: Implantação de Modelo; Langflow: Low-code No-code); Monthly visits (Flowise: 210.5K; Langflow: 243.6K); Monthly growth (Flowise: -5.9%; Langflow: 6.2%); Favorites (Flowise: 119; Langflow: 69); Website (Flowise: flowiseai.com; Langflow: www.langflow.org). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic comparison, Flowise currently shows 210.5K visits and Langflow shows 243.6K; Langflow has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Flowise, an absolute difference of about 33.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Flowise and Langflow currently overlap in shared categories: Low-code No-code; shared tags: Agente de IA, Ferramentas de desenvolvedor, low-code, Sistemas multiagente, No-code, Código Aberto, Geração Aumentada por Recuperação, Construtor visual e automação de fluxo de trabalho. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Flowise's unique categories/tags are Implantação de Modelo, Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho, Chatbot, Construtor de chatbot e LangChain; Langflow's are Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho, API e Modelo de Linguagem de Grande Escala. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Flowise has no verified rating, 0 comments, 119 favorites, and 134 likes;Langflow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 69 favorites, and 77 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Flowise first

Put Flowise on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Implantação de Modelo” and especially Implantação de Modelo, Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho, Chatbot, Construtor de chatbot e LangChain. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Flowise also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 210.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Langflow first

Put Langflow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Low-code No-code” and especially Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho, API e Modelo de Linguagem de Grande Escala. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Langflow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 243.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Flowise and Langflow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between Flowise and Langflow?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.