ToolMage
Entrar
GetESP
Marketing por E-mail · 3.5K visitas mensais

GetESP é uma ferramenta gratuita que melhora a entregabilidade de e-mails identificando o Provedor de Serviços de E-mail (ESP) dos seus destinatários. Carregue sua lista de e-mails para analisar e segmentar contatos por ESPs como Gmail ou Outlook. Esta estratégia de 'ESP Matching' ajuda seus e-mails a chegarem na caixa de entrada, contornar filtros de spam e aumentar as taxas de abertura. Também detecta ferramentas avançadas de proteção contra spam para um planejamento de campanha mais eficaz.

Visitar siteVer detalhes
VS
mailgo
Marketing por E-mail · 7.7K visitas mensais

mailgo é uma plataforma de e-mail frio alimentada por IA, projetada para vendas e marketing B2B. Automatiza a descoberta de leads, verificação de e-mails e envio de campanhas, garantindo alta entregabilidade através de recursos como aquecimento de caixa de entrada e proteção anti-spam. É uma solução completa para escalar a aquisição de clientes de forma eficiente.

Visitar siteVer detalhes

GetESP vs mailgo: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare GetESP e mailgo por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

GetESP Visão geral

GetESP é uma ferramenta gratuita que melhora a entregabilidade de e-mails identificando o Provedor de Serviços de E-mail (ESP) dos seus destinatários. Carregue sua lista de e-mails para analisar e segmentar contatos por ESPs como Gmail ou Outlook. Esta estratégia de 'ESP Matching' ajuda seus e-mails a chegarem na caixa de entrada, contornar filtros de spam e aumentar as taxas de abertura. Também detecta ferramentas avançadas de proteção contra spam para um planejamento de campanha mais eficaz.

Preview

mailgo Visão geral

mailgo é uma plataforma de e-mail frio alimentada por IA, projetada para vendas e marketing B2B. Automatiza a descoberta de leads, verificação de e-mails e envio de campanhas, garantindo alta entregabilidade através de recursos como aquecimento de caixa de entrada e proteção anti-spam. É uma solução completa para escalar a aquisição de clientes de forma eficiente.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureGetESPmailgo
Categoria principalMarketing por E-mailMarketing por E-mail
Adicionado2025-08-132025-08-09
PreçoGratuitoFreemium
Site oficialgetesp.iowww.mailgo.ai
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais3.5K7.7K
Crescimento mensalNão verificado-16.3%
Favoritos112106
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

GetESP vs mailgo monthly traffic

Compare GetESP and mailgo by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the GetESP vs mailgo monthly traffic comparison, GetESP currently shows 3.5K visits and mailgo shows 7.7K; mailgo has about 2.2 times the visible traffic of GetESP, an absolute difference of about 4.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only mailgo has complete third-party traffic details; GetESP uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

GetESP monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
3.5K

mailgo monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
7.7K
Duração média
0:06
Páginas por visita
1.52
Taxa de rejeição
55.55%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 11.7K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 7.5K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 6K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 13.8K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 9.2K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 7.7K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States52.74%4.1K
🇮🇳India22.71%1.7K
🇬🇧United Kingdom16.95%1.3K
🇵🇰Pakistan7.6%585

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto96.22%7.4K
Referência3.78%291

Palavras-chave

email full guessemail guesserfree email verifiermailgomailgo discord
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of GetESP and mailgo

GetESP Core features

Marketing por E-mail
Geração de Leads
Análise de Dados

mailgo Core features

Marketing por E-mail
Geração de Leads
Automação

Use cases

GetESP Use cases

Email frio
marketing por e-mail
Verificação de e-mail
Geração de leads
Entregabilidade de e-mail
Verificador de ESP
Colocação na caixa de entrada
Prospecção de vendas
filtro de spam

mailgo Use cases

Email frio
marketing por e-mail
Verificação de e-mail
Geração de leads
B2B
Prospecção por e-mail
Aquecimento de caixa de entrada
Automação de vendas

GetESP vs mailgo：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth GetESP vs mailgo comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. GetESP is primarily listed under “Marketing por E-mail”, while mailgo is primarily listed under “Marketing por E-mail”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (GetESP: Free; mailgo: Freemium); Monthly visits (GetESP: 3.5K; mailgo: 7.7K); Favorites (GetESP: 112; mailgo: 106); Website (GetESP: getesp.io; mailgo: www.mailgo.ai); Added (GetESP: 2025-08-13; mailgo: 2025-08-09). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the GetESP vs mailgo monthly traffic comparison, GetESP currently shows 3.5K visits and mailgo shows 7.7K; mailgo has about 2.2 times the visible traffic of GetESP, an absolute difference of about 4.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only mailgo has complete third-party traffic details; GetESP uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

GetESP and mailgo currently overlap in shared categories: Marketing por E-mail e Geração de Leads; shared tags: Email frio, marketing por e-mail, Verificação de e-mail e Geração de leads. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

GetESP's unique categories/tags are Análise de Dados, Entregabilidade de e-mail, Verificador de ESP, Colocação na caixa de entrada, Prospecção de vendas e filtro de spam; mailgo's are Automação, B2B, Prospecção por e-mail, Aquecimento de caixa de entrada e Automação de vendas. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

GetESP has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 116 likes；mailgo has no verified rating, 0 comments, 106 favorites, and 108 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate GetESP first

Put GetESP on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Marketing por E-mail” and especially Análise de Dados, Entregabilidade de e-mail, Verificador de ESP, Colocação na caixa de entrada, Prospecção de vendas e filtro de spam. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

GetESP also currently records: pricing is free, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate mailgo first

Put mailgo on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Marketing por E-mail” and especially Automação, B2B, Prospecção por e-mail, Aquecimento de caixa de entrada e Automação de vendas. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

mailgo also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 7.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in GetESP and mailgo, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between GetESP and mailgo?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.