ToolMage
Entrar
No-Code Scraper
Raspagem de Dados da Web · 3.3K visitas mensais

O No-Code Scraper é uma plataforma alimentada por IA que permite aos utilizadores extrair dados de qualquer site sem escrever uma única linha de código. Utiliza grandes modelos de linguagem para automatizar a extração, limpeza e estruturação de dados, tornando o web scraping acessível, fiável e eficiente para todos.

VS
ParseHub
Raspagem de Dados da Web · 68.7K visitas mensais

O ParseHub é uma poderosa ferramenta de web scraping sem código que permite aos usuários extrair dados de qualquer site com uma interface simples de apontar e clicar. Ele foi projetado para lidar com sites complexos e dinâmicos com JavaScript, AJAX, formulários e rolagem infinita. Os dados podem ser coletados em um cronograma, exportados como JSON/Excel ou acessados via API, tornando-o ideal para geração de leads, pesquisa de mercado e agregação de dados.

No-Code Scraper vs ParseHub: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare No-Code Scraper e ParseHub por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

No-Code Scraper Visão geral

O No-Code Scraper é uma plataforma alimentada por IA que permite aos utilizadores extrair dados de qualquer site sem escrever uma única linha de código. Utiliza grandes modelos de linguagem para automatizar a extração, limpeza e estruturação de dados, tornando o web scraping acessível, fiável e eficiente para todos.

Preview

ParseHub Visão geral

O ParseHub é uma poderosa ferramenta de web scraping sem código que permite aos usuários extrair dados de qualquer site com uma interface simples de apontar e clicar. Ele foi projetado para lidar com sites complexos e dinâmicos com JavaScript, AJAX, formulários e rolagem infinita. Os dados podem ser coletados em um cronograma, exportados como JSON/Excel ou acessados via API, tornando-o ideal para geração de leads, pesquisa de mercado e agregação de dados.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureNo-Code ScraperParseHub
Categoria principalRaspagem de Dados da WebRaspagem de Dados da Web
Adicionado2025-08-102025-08-06
PreçoFreemiumFreemium
Site oficialwww.nocodescraper.comparsehub.com
Tipo de produtoSiteAplicativo
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais3.3K68.7K
Crescimento mensal-14.3%-7.1%
Favoritos125102
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

No-Code Scraper vs ParseHub monthly traffic

Compare No-Code Scraper and ParseHub by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the No-Code Scraper vs ParseHub monthly traffic comparison, No-Code Scraper currently shows 3.3K visits and ParseHub shows 68.7K; ParseHub has about 20.6 times the visible traffic of No-Code Scraper, an absolute difference of about 65.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

No-Code Scraper monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
3.3K
Duração média
0:47
Páginas por visita
2.03
Taxa de rejeição
45.35%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 5K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 2.6K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 2.2K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 5.1K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 3.9K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 3.3K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States39.52%1.3K
🇭🇰Hong Kong33.21%1.1K
🇮🇩Indonesia18.52%617
🇮🇳India8.75%292

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Referência94.54%3.2K
Direto5.46%182

Palavras-chave

instant data scraperinstant data scraper extensionno code scrapernocodescraperno code web scraper

ParseHub monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
68.7K
Duração média
0:19
Páginas por visita
1.89
Taxa de rejeição
39.47%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 136.2K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 120.4K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 102.7K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 82.7K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 74K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 68.7K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States39.93%27.4K
🇮🇳India23.24%16K
🇳🇬Nigeria14.19%9.7K
🇬🇧United Kingdom13.27%9.1K
🇧🇷Brazil9.37%6.4K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto91.62%62.9K
Referência6.21%4.3K
E-mail2.17%1.5K

Palavras-chave

free webscraping coursehow to get an html sentence for a specific value on a websitepareshubparsehubparse hub how to click on gdpr agreement first
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate ParseHub first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of No-Code Scraper and ParseHub

No-Code Scraper Core features

Raspagem de Dados da Web
Geração de Leads
Automação
Desenvolvimento

ParseHub Core features

Raspagem de Dados da Web
Geração de Leads
Automação
Extração de Dados

Use cases

No-Code Scraper Use cases

automação
Extração de dados
mineração de dados
Geração de leads
pesquisa de mercado
No-code
Web scraping
IA
Limpeza de dados

ParseHub Use cases

automação
Extração de dados
mineração de dados
Geração de leads
pesquisa de mercado
No-code
Web scraping
Coleta de dados
Rastreamento de preços

No-Code Scraper vs ParseHub:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth No-Code Scraper vs ParseHub comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. No-Code Scraper is primarily listed under “Raspagem de Dados da Web”, while ParseHub is primarily listed under “Raspagem de Dados da Web”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (No-Code Scraper: Website; ParseHub: App); Monthly visits (No-Code Scraper: 3.3K; ParseHub: 68.7K); Monthly growth (No-Code Scraper: -14.3%; ParseHub: -7.1%); Favorites (No-Code Scraper: 125; ParseHub: 102); Website (No-Code Scraper: www.nocodescraper.com; ParseHub: parsehub.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the No-Code Scraper vs ParseHub monthly traffic comparison, No-Code Scraper currently shows 3.3K visits and ParseHub shows 68.7K; ParseHub has about 20.6 times the visible traffic of No-Code Scraper, an absolute difference of about 65.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate ParseHub first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

No-Code Scraper and ParseHub currently overlap in shared categories: Raspagem de Dados da Web, Geração de Leads e Automação; shared tags: automação, Extração de dados, mineração de dados, Geração de leads, pesquisa de mercado, No-code e Web scraping. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

No-Code Scraper's unique categories/tags are Desenvolvimento, IA e Limpeza de dados; ParseHub's are Extração de Dados, Coleta de dados e Rastreamento de preços. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

No-Code Scraper has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 123 likes;ParseHub has no verified rating, 0 comments, 102 favorites, and 97 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate No-Code Scraper first

Put No-Code Scraper on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Raspagem de Dados da Web” and especially Desenvolvimento, IA e Limpeza de dados. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

No-Code Scraper also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate ParseHub first

Put ParseHub on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Raspagem de Dados da Web” and especially Extração de Dados, Coleta de dados e Rastreamento de preços. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

ParseHub also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 68.7K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in No-Code Scraper and ParseHub, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between No-Code Scraper and ParseHub?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.