ToolMage
Entrar
makerpeak
Análise · 55.7K visitas mensais

makerpeak é uma plataforma tudo-em-um para indie hackers, solopreneurs e criadores. Integra gestão de projetos, análises de negócios em tempo real (MRR, churn), feedback de usuários e changelogs em um único painel intuitivo. Pare de jonglar com várias ferramentas e foque em construir e crescer seus projetos.

VS
Screenful
Análise · 17K visitas mensais

Screenful é uma plataforma de análise de produtividade para equipes ágeis que automatiza relatórios de progresso. Ele visualiza dados de ferramentas de gerenciamento de projetos como Jira, Trello e Asana, permitindo que as equipes rastreiem métricas-chave como velocidade, lead/cycle times e throughput. Isso ajuda a identificar gargalos, melhorar fluxos de trabalho e tomar decisões baseadas em dados. Com painéis personalizáveis, modelos prontos e relatórios automatizados, o Screenful fornece insights acionáveis para aprimorar o desempenho da equipe e a entrega de projetos.

makerpeak vs Screenful: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare makerpeak e Screenful por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

makerpeak Visão geral

makerpeak é uma plataforma tudo-em-um para indie hackers, solopreneurs e criadores. Integra gestão de projetos, análises de negócios em tempo real (MRR, churn), feedback de usuários e changelogs em um único painel intuitivo. Pare de jonglar com várias ferramentas e foque em construir e crescer seus projetos.

Preview

Screenful Visão geral

Screenful é uma plataforma de análise de produtividade para equipes ágeis que automatiza relatórios de progresso. Ele visualiza dados de ferramentas de gerenciamento de projetos como Jira, Trello e Asana, permitindo que as equipes rastreiem métricas-chave como velocidade, lead/cycle times e throughput. Isso ajuda a identificar gargalos, melhorar fluxos de trabalho e tomar decisões baseadas em dados. Com painéis personalizáveis, modelos prontos e relatórios automatizados, o Screenful fornece insights acionáveis para aprimorar o desempenho da equipe e a entrega de projetos.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeaturemakerpeakScreenful
Categoria principalAnáliseAnálise
Adicionado2025-08-152025-08-11
PreçoFreemiumFreemium
Site oficialx.comscreenful.com
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais55.7K17K
Crescimento mensalNão verificado8.4%
Favoritos11386
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

makerpeak vs Screenful monthly traffic

Compare makerpeak and Screenful by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the makerpeak vs Screenful monthly traffic comparison, makerpeak currently shows 55.7K visits and Screenful shows 17K; makerpeak has about 3.3 times the visible traffic of Screenful, an absolute difference of about 38.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Screenful has complete third-party traffic details; makerpeak uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

makerpeak is registered at the x.com/marvr_ subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

makerpeak monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
55.7K

Screenful monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
17K
Duração média
0:34
Páginas por visita
1.77
Taxa de rejeição
44.93%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 17K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 25.5K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 15K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 17.7K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 15.7K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 17K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States66.96%11.4K
🇩🇪Germany15.03%2.6K
🇷🇺Russia6.58%1.1K
🇧🇷Brazil6.22%1.1K
🇬🇧United Kingdom5.21%888

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto57.17%9.7K
Referência32.37%5.5K
E-mail10.46%1.8K

Palavras-chave

github projects how to backdate the burndown chartgitlab tokentools to get github insightstrello effort fieldtrello set card widths
Traffic-based selection guidance: makerpeak is registered under a x.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing makerpeak for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of makerpeak and Screenful

makerpeak Core features

Análise
Gerenciamento de Projetos
Painel

Screenful Core features

Análise
Gerenciamento de Projetos
DevOps

Use cases

makerpeak Use cases

Painel
gerenciamento de projetos
Análise
Construir em público
indie hacker
Rastreador de MRR
produtividade
SaaS
Empreendedor individual
Ferramentas para startups

Screenful Use cases

Painel
gerenciamento de projetos
Métricas Ágeis
Asana
visualização de dados
Jira
Kanban
Análise de Produtividade
Automação de Relatórios
Scrum
Trello

makerpeak vs Screenful:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth makerpeak vs Screenful comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. makerpeak is primarily listed under “Análise”, while Screenful is primarily listed under “Análise”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (makerpeak: 55.7K; Screenful: 17K); Favorites (makerpeak: 113; Screenful: 86); Website (makerpeak: x.com; Screenful: screenful.com); Added (makerpeak: 2025-08-15; Screenful: 2025-08-11). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the makerpeak vs Screenful monthly traffic comparison, makerpeak currently shows 55.7K visits and Screenful shows 17K; makerpeak has about 3.3 times the visible traffic of Screenful, an absolute difference of about 38.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Screenful has complete third-party traffic details; makerpeak uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

makerpeak is registered at the x.com/marvr_ subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

makerpeak is registered under a x.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing makerpeak for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

makerpeak and Screenful currently overlap in shared categories: Análise e Gerenciamento de Projetos; shared tags: Painel e gerenciamento de projetos. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

makerpeak's unique categories/tags are Painel, Análise, Construir em público, indie hacker, Rastreador de MRR, produtividade, SaaS e Empreendedor individual; Screenful's are DevOps, Métricas Ágeis, Asana, visualização de dados, Jira, Kanban, Análise de Produtividade e Automação de Relatórios. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

makerpeak has no verified rating, 0 comments, 113 favorites, and 106 likes;Screenful has no verified rating, 0 comments, 86 favorites, and 87 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate makerpeak first

Put makerpeak on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análise” and especially Painel, Análise, Construir em público, indie hacker, Rastreador de MRR e produtividade. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

makerpeak also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 55.7K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Screenful first

Put Screenful on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análise” and especially DevOps, Métricas Ágeis, Asana, visualização de dados, Jira e Kanban. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Screenful also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 17K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in makerpeak and Screenful, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between makerpeak and Screenful?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.